Learn
Analysis methodology
Every submitted YouTube video or Doc Bro website runs through the same pipeline: eight checks, four scores, and a peer-reviewed literature cross-check.
The four scores (0–100)
Credential Legitimacy
How real the degree behind the title is: a real MD/DO confirmed against the federal provider registry scores high and, for them, the score reflects only the degree. Other licensed clinicians (DC, ND, NP, and similar) land mid, and advertising diagnosis or treatment outside their board's scope lowers it further and sets the inflation flag. An unverified "Dr." with no matching license scores low.
Higher = more legitimateManipulation Index
Density of persuasion tactics. Boosted when a "not medical advice" disclaimer is contradicted or a non-MD practices outside scope.
Higher = more manipulativeSales Funnel Index
Product, coaching, and lab routing signals. Boosted when supplements and labs are pitched together, a cash-only practice steers to FSA/HSA, or non-standard-of-care services are sold via care plans, intensives, supplements, or third-party lab panels.
Higher = more salesyBro Energy
Doc Bro-style delivery and "trust me bro" framing.
Higher = more broHow the Wall of Fame is ordered
One published total, not an editor's hunch. Three of the four scores feed it. Bro Energy does not.
| What counts | Worth |
|---|---|
| Manipulation Index | 40 percent of a base worth up to 80 |
| Sales Funnel Index | 40 percent of the same base |
| Credential gap (100 minus Credential Legitimacy) | 20 percent of the same base |
| Credential inflation | 3 points |
| Undisclosed kickbacks | 3 points |
| Advice beyond the license | 3 points |
| A disclaimer used as a shield, or missing while the advice runs beyond the license | 3 points |
| FSA/HSA steering | 3 points |
| Those last three flags together | 8 points |
| Published wording that lists a condition the registry classes under infants and children | 8 points |
The card shows this total clamped to 0 to 100. The wall is ordered by the full total, which tops out at 111, so two cards can both show 100 and still rank apart. The infants-and-children addition reads the subject's own published wording, never applies to a doctor the federal provider registry confirms as an MD or DO, and never applies on the Wall of Shame.
What every report checks
| Check | What it looks for | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Source & relevance validation | Confirms the link is health or "Doc Bro" content from an official channel or site, not reposts, clip channels, or fan uploads. | Accept / reject + reasons |
| Credentials check | Stated credentials vs. the federal provider registry and the licensing boards. A registry-confirmed MD/DO counts as the subject's credential and is never marked inflated for scope reach; for other licenses the inflation flag marks a "Dr." title used to advertise beyond the board's scope or with no matching license. | Registry credential + stated / likely lists + inflation flag |
| Manipulation playbook | Persuasion tactics quoted from the content with transcript timestamps where available (11 tactic types). | Flagged tactic cards |
| Supplements, labs & grift map | Supplement and lab-panel pitches, likely kickback sources, and whether material financial ties were disclosed. | Pitches + kickback cards + disclosure |
| "Not medical advice" contradiction | Posts a liability disclaimer yet still dispenses concrete medical advice (stop meds, dosing, "cure" a disease). | Disclaimer / advice / contradiction flags |
| Insurance & payment posture | Medicare/Medicaid and private-insurance acceptance, FSA/HSA steering, and "not covered/recognized by insurance" claims. | yes / no / unclear + cash-pay flags |
| Credential & scope-of-practice | Chiropractor (or other non-MD) "Dr." dispensing advice beyond their state-board license scope. | Likely credential + out-of-scope flag |
| Standard of care | Any practitioner marketing services outside the accepted standard of care for their specialty, the "insurance won't cover it" selling point, and monetization via care plans, intensives, supplements, or third-party lab panels. | Non-standard service list + non-coverage and third-party-funnel flags |
| Claims vs. peer-reviewed literature | Major claims cross-checked against PubMed, Europe PMC, and major journals, each with a verdict. | Verdict + cited references |
Manipulation tactics we flag
- Fear Mongering
- Stokes distrust of mainstream medicine so you trust the Doc Bro instead.
- False Authority
- White-coat or credential framing to make opinion sound like settled science.
- Cherry-Picked Evidence
- One anecdote or outlier study stands in for the whole literature.
- False Dichotomy
- "Natural vs. pharma" all-or-nothing framing.
- Urgency / Scarcity
- Artificial time pressure to short-circuit careful research.
- Testimonial Overload
- Personal stories replace population-level evidence.
- Sales Funnel Motive
- Advice routes you toward products, coaching, or email lists.
- Undisclosed Compensation
- Product pitches with no #ad or paid-partnership disclosure.
- Lab Test Upsell
- Pushes expensive functional-medicine panels as a funnel entry point.
- Proprietary Product Funnel
- Advice tied to a branded product only they sell.
- Affiliate / Recruitment Funnel
- Recruits followers to sell or promote the Doc Bro's products for a cut, turning the audience into an unpaid sales force.
Kickback categories
Supplement brand dealLab testing referralAffiliate / promo linkReferral feeAffiliate / ambassador program (operator)Coaching or consult upsellPaid wellness plan / membershipSpeaking feeConsulting feeProprietary productIn-office dispensing markupInter-doctor kickbackOther financial tie
Each flagged tie is marked Disclosed or Not disclosed.
Claims vs. literature
Claim types: Diagnostic · Treatment · Causation · Conspiracy · Testimonial · General advice
UnsupportedMixedPartially supportedSupported
Sources: PubMed / MEDLINE, Europe PMC, OpenAlex, and major journals (BMJ, Lancet, JAMA, NEJM, Cochrane-indexed reviews).
Submission flow
1 · Extract
Pull title, channel or author, platform, and transcript or page text from the submitted URL.
2 · Validate
Confirm Doc Bro health content from an official source before any automated analysis runs.
3 · Analyze
Run all eight checks, assign four scores, and cross-reference top claims against peer-reviewed literature.
4 · Archive (optional)
Snapshot the source and key outlinks to the Wayback Machine when archiving is configured.
5 · Publish
Score the submission, assign Wall of Fame or Shame placement, and append to the Doc Bro dossier.