One post from Kevin Sean Conners's dossier. This page reviews a single piece of material. The full dossier cross-checks 14 materials and carries the verified credential and scope verdicts.
Read the full dossier →Kevin Sean Conners alias The Hidden-Risk Hotline
slangin' hopium at Conners Clinic
TikTok · 6747693110815704070
Practice location
7582 CURRELL BLVD
WOODBURY, MN 55125
Persuasion and sales-funnel patterns outweigh the evidence here.
- Of 11 health claims, 5 run counter to or conflict with the published evidence, and 3 were not independently checked.
- Primary persuasion tactic: Hidden-threat cancer framing.
- Stated credentials look inflated relative to the advice given.
- Gives advice beyond what their license covers.
Kevin Conners opens with the immune system, sprinkles in toxic-load suspense, and then rings the free-discovery-call bell. It is a tidy little cancer-anxiety funnel, even before the supplements and lab panels make their inevitable cameo.
Elevated grift signals
Score breakdown
Direct answer
Kevin Sean Conners is licensed in Minnesota as a chiropractor (DC), not as an MD or DO, and Minnesota's chiropractic scope statute (Minn. Stat. § 148.01, subds. 1 and 4) limits that license to musculoskeletal care, not the diagnosis or treatment of systemic disease. Even so, they advertise diagnosing or treating Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching, #1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic, Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer, NON-Cancer?, and Cancer, conditions that belong with oncologists.
Key findings
- Fear Mongering: The post suggests that concealed everyday exposures, stress, and food choices are repeatedly driving cancer risk, encouraging anxiety without identifying specific exposure levels, cancer types, or evidence-based risk estimates.see section ↓
- Claim "Certain foods feed disease while other foods feed immune defense, implying that food choi…": only partially supported.see section ↓
- Claim "Quiet daily inputs accumulating over months and years cause the body to lose the ability…": not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.see section ↓
- NPI registry confirms Kevin Conners as Chiropractor (DC) in Minnesota (NPI 1699828210).see section ↓
- Kevin Sean Conners shows credential inflation relative to stated vs likely credentials.see section ↓
- Dr Kevin Sean Conners is marketed with a doctor title, but reviewed credentials indicate Chiropractor (DC) rather than an MD/DO physician license.see section ↓
- Against Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners scope rules (Minn. Stat. § 148.01, subds. 1 and 4), these advertised activities appear outside Kevin Sean Conners's license (including conditions they merely list as ones they treat): Toxic load hiding in everyday products is a hidden cancer risk…see section ↓
- 11 of 11 advertised activities fall outside permitted Chiropractor scope in MN.see section ↓
Claims & evidence
9 advertised conditions or treatments fall outside their license scope. Each box leads with state-board scope notation; literature cross-check follows when we matched a specific claim. Every card carries its receipts: the quoted wording, a live source link, and an archived copy.
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Toxic load hiding in everyday products is a hidden cancer risk factor..
Toxic load hiding in everyday products is a hidden cancer risk factor.
- Supports
- Some chemicals found in consumer products are established or suspected carcinogens, and exposure through products can contribute to overall chemical exposure. [1][2][3][4] The IARC has evaluated carcinogenic hazards among chemicals occurring in industrial and consumer products, food, and drinking-water by-products, supporting the general principle that certain product-related chemical exposures can cause cancer . A systematic review found that exposure to mixtures of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals was positively associated with several cancers, although the evidence was based mainly on case-control studies and requires confirmation in better prospective research . Some observational research also reports associations between mixtures of frequently used personal-care products and ovarian or postmenopausal breast cancer, but effect sizes were small and findings were not consistent across products .
- Contradicts
- The claim is too broad and implies that a generalized hidden toxic load in everyday products is a recognized cancer risk factor for ordinary consumers. [3][4] Most consumer products confer very low cancer risk, if any, and associations between product use and cancer are often inconclusive. [1][2] For many cosmetics and common household products, epidemiologic evidence is absent, sparse, or insufficient to establish causation. Hazard identification for an ingredient does not establish that typical exposure from a finished product causes a meaningful cancer risk; dose, route, duration, product formulation, and regulatory limits matter. The supplied index papers are clinical-trial registrations unrelated to consumer-product chemical exposure and provide no direct support for the claim .
- Mainstream view
- Certain exposures associated with products, such as asbestos, benzene, formaldehyde, arsenic, some pesticides, and selected persistent chemicals, can increase cancer risk at sufficiently high or sustained exposure. [1][2] However, there is no sound basis for treating an unspecified cumulative toxic load from everyday products as a generally established or major hidden cancer risk factor. [3] Mainstream assessment requires identifying the specific chemical and exposure level; for most everyday consumer use, evidence of a substantial cancer risk is limited or uncertain. [4]
“The toxic load hiding in everyday products”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Chronic stress measurably suppresses immune function in a way that contributes to cancer taking hold..
Chronic stress measurably suppresses immune function in a way that contributes to cancer taking hold.
- Supports
- Chronic stress is associated with measurable changes in immune regulation, including altered immune-cell trafficking and function, reduced cellular immune responses, and increased inflammatory or immunosuppressive signaling. [8] However, the supplied index papers do not directly evaluate chronic stress, immune suppression, or cancer onset; the PTSD neuroimaging meta-analysis addresses brain metabolites rather than immune function or cancer . [7] Reviews of psychoneuroimmunology and oncology describe plausible mechanisms and observational associations involving impaired antitumor immunity, particularly in patients who already have cancer. Experimental and clinical evidence more consistently concerns tumor progression, metastasis, prognosis, or treatment response than cancer initiation. [5][6]
- Contradicts
- A systematic review of prospective studies found that stressful life events and perceived stress were not consistently associated with cancer incidence, with conflicting results across cancer types. [6][8] This directly weakens the claim that chronic stress contributes to cancer taking hold as a general, established causal relationship. Evidence that stress measurably changes immune parameters does not establish that those changes cause a new cancer to initiate in humans. [5] The supplied index papers are largely irrelevant to the claim: the kidney-disease immune-checkpoint review concerns cancer treatment , the motor-cortex review concerns chronic pain , the PTSD/HPA meta-analysis concerns HPA function in PTSD and depression rather than cancer onset , and the remaining listed reviews concern low-back-pain interventions, immune-checkpoint adverse events, islet impairment, or COPD . [7] Much of the supportive cancer literature is mechanistic, preclinical, or observational and may be confounded by health behaviors, socioeconomic conditions, comorbidity, reverse causation, and cancer-related distress.
- Mainstream view
- Chronic stress can measurably modulate immune, endocrine, and inflammatory systems, and it may influence the tumor microenvironment, progression, metastasis, or outcomes in some cancer settings. [6][7][8] The mainstream view is not that chronic stress is proven to suppress immunity in a uniform way or that it is an established general cause of cancer initiation. For the specific claim that stress-related immune suppression contributes to cancer taking hold, human evidence is biologically plausible but inconsistent and insufficient to establish causation. [5]
“How chronic stress measurably suppresses immune function”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Certain foods feed disease while other foods feed immune defense, implying that food choices materially determine cancer progression or prevention..
Certain foods feed disease while other foods feed immune defense, implying that food choices materially determine cancer progression or prevention.
- Supports
- High-quality expert reviews and major guidelines support that overall dietary patterns and specific exposures influence the risk of developing some cancers. [9][12] They recommend diets rich in whole grains, vegetables, fruit, and beans, while limiting processed meat, red meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, highly processed energy-dense foods, and alcohol. Maintaining a healthy body weight and a predominantly plant-based dietary pattern are also associated with lower risk for several cancers. [11] These findings support a qualified version of the claim for cancer prevention, but not the simplistic idea that individual foods directly feed or starve cancer or reliably activate immune defenses. [10]
- Contradicts
- The cited index papers mainly concern food analysis, feed applications, and measurement methods, not cancer prevention, cancer progression, or anticancer immunity; therefore they provide no direct support for the claim. [9][10][11][12] Evidence for diet and cancer is largely based on long-term observational associations and population-level patterns, with effects varying by cancer type and overall lifestyle. Major guidelines do not state that particular foods determine an established cancer's progression or that foods can reliably boost immune defenses against cancer. There is no established dietary substitute for evidence-based cancer treatment, and claims about specific foods reversing, controlling, or feeding cancer are unsupported as stated.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream medical position is that diet materially affects cancer risk at a population level, chiefly through overall dietary pattern, alcohol intake, body weight, and established associations such as processed meat and colorectal cancer risk. [9][10][11][12] Healthy eating may support general health and treatment tolerance, but no particular food is known to determine cancer progression or selectively enhance anticancer immunity in a clinically reliable way. Cancer prevention and treatment require attention to established risk reduction and appropriate medical care, not categorizing foods as universally cancer-feeding or immune-boosting.
“Why certain foods feed disease while others feed defense”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching.
Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching
- Supports
- No specific peer-reviewed evidence or clinical trial in the supplied index results evaluates Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching. [35][38] General cancer health-coaching research suggests possible improvements in quality of life, mood, and physical activity among cancer survivors, but it does not establish that this named program is licensed or treats cancer. [36][37]
- Contradicts
- The supplied index papers are unrelated clinical-trial registrations and provide no evidence that Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching is a licensed cancer treatment. [35][36][37] Evidence reviews distinguish supportive complementary care from alternative therapies claimed to treat tumors; alternative cancer treatments generally lack convincing evidence of safety and efficacy. [38] Use of complementary medicine associated with refusal of conventional treatment has been associated with substantially higher mortality, although this does not specifically evaluate this clinic.
- Mainstream view
- The statement is not a sufficiently specified medical efficacy claim, and no basis is provided to verify that the named service is licensed. [35][37] Cancer coaching may offer supportive education or psychosocial help when delivered by appropriately qualified professionals, but it should not be represented as an alternative cancer treatment or as a substitute for oncology care. [36][38] Licensing must be verified through the relevant jurisdiction and professional regulator.
“Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure #1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic.
#1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“#1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic”
Rule: Minn. Stat. § 148.01, subds. 1 and 4; Minn. R. 2500.0200
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer.
Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer
- Supports
- Addressing causes and risk factors can prevent some cancers before they develop, including tobacco exposure, obesity, alcohol use, carcinogenic infections, and ultraviolet radiation. However, this is prevention rather than evidence that an established cancer should be treated only by addressing its cause. [43][44] The listed index papers are methods and trial-registration papers and do not provide evidence supporting this treatment claim.
- Contradicts
- For diagnosed cancer, major medical guidance recommends cancer-directed treatment such as surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, or combinations, selected according to cancer type and stage. [41][42][44] The WHO distinguishes prevention from treatment and states that patients who develop cancer require appropriate treatment and care, commonly including surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. [43][46] Treating a causal or contributing condition may be an important component of care in selected cancers, but it does not generally replace treatment of the malignant tumor. Evidence for a universal strategy of treating the cause instead of the cancer is absent from the supplied papers; the albumin sepsis review is unrelated to cancer treatment. [40]
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream oncology position is to identify and address modifiable causes and comorbidities while providing evidence-based cancer-directed treatment when cancer is diagnosed. [44][45] Cause-directed interventions can prevent some cancers or complement treatment in specific situations, but the slogan as stated misleadingly implies that treating the cause should take priority over or substitute for treating established cancer. [40][43]
“Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE as within their scope of practice.
Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure NON-Cancer?.
NON-Cancer?
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“NON-Cancer?”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause.
Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause
- Supports
- Addressing causes and risk factors can prevent some cancers or reduce cancer incidence; WHO estimates that 30% to 50% of cancer cases are preventable through measures such as tobacco control, vaccination, and reducing harmful exposures. [44][47][49] However, this supports prevention, not replacing treatment after cancer has developed.
- Contradicts
- The claim is too broad and implies that cancer-directed treatment should be abandoned in favor of treating an unspecified cause. [44][47][49] Evidence-based cancer care uses surgery, radiotherapy, systemic medicines, immunotherapy, and combinations chosen according to cancer type and stage. These treatments can cure some cancers, prolong survival, or provide palliation. The listed index papers do not provide direct evidence that treating an unspecified underlying cause can replace standard cancer treatment; most are unrelated to cancer, and the NSCLC trial listing is only a trial record rather than evidence establishing such a general strategy.
- Mainstream view
- Cancer has diverse causes and biological mechanisms, so prevention and management of relevant risk factors are important but generally cannot substitute for diagnosis and cancer-directed treatment. [44][47][49] Major medical guidance supports individualized, multidisciplinary treatment based on tumor type, stage, and patient factors, alongside prevention, supportive care, and palliative care. As stated, the slogan is unsupported and potentially dangerous if interpreted as advice to delay or refuse proven cancer treatment.
“Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause”
Manipulation
transcript · cited
The post suggests that concealed everyday exposures, stress, and food choices are repeatedly driving cancer risk, encouraging anxiety without identifying specific exposure levels, cancer types, or evidence-based risk estimates. Likely motive: Create fear and uncertainty that make a discovery call appear necessary.
“3 hidden risk factors we see again and again in functional medicine work”
transcript · cited
The wording invokes clinical-sounding functional-medicine experience to imply authority over cancer causation, but the clip provides no oncology credentials, evidence, or explanation of what was actually observed. Likely motive: Borrow medical authority to support a broad, commercially useful cancer-risk narrative.
“we see again and again in functional medicine work”
transcript · cited
The post moves from a serious disease and vague hidden risks directly to a consultation CTA. The word free may lower resistance while the downstream service and pricing are not disclosed here. Likely motive: Convert cancer-related concern into leads for a paid assessment or wellness program.
“Schedule a Free Discovery Call with Dr. Conners today”
Commerce & grift map
The visible funnel is fear about cancer and hidden risks leading to a free discovery call; no supplement, laboratory, affiliate, or proprietary-product sale is visible in this clip. The call may be a lead-generation step for services, but the supplied content does not establish a specific payment or referral arrangement.
No FTC-style compensation disclosure
compensationDisclosures · scan
Host self-funnel around guest content
guestCollaboration · selfFunnel
Host routes viewers to their own consult/booking links around the guest segment.
Credentials & scope
Glossary: Chiropractor (“Dr.”)
Learn: Is a chiropractor a medical doctor?
Credentials and scope reflect the dossier-wide determination for this subject, drawn from the strongest verified material across every analyzed source.
Stated: DR · Likely: Chiropractor
Verified against the federal provider registry: D.C. · Chiropractor · MN license 2372.
Kevin Conners appears to lean on a non-physician doctorate plus a pile of fellowships/certifications to project broad medical authority. The problem is not the title itself; it is using that narrow authority to market cancer, Lyme, autoimmune, detox, and genetics services as if it were general oncology or internal medicine.
- D.PSc., Doctor of Professional Studies in Chiropractic / related professional doctorate
A doctorate-level credential, but not an MD/DO medical license. It does not by itself authorize general diagnosis and treatment of systemic disease.
A chiropractic-related doctorate generally does not expand state scope beyond chiropractic practice and allowed adjunctive wellness counseling; it does not make the holder an oncologist or internist.
Permitted scope vs advertised
Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners · Confidence: high
Minnesota licenses chiropractors to provide chiropractic services, acupuncture, therapeutic services, and diagnosis or opinions for determining a course of action related to those services. Chiropractic is limited to identifying and caring for vertebral subluxations and other abnormal articulations and expressly is not the practice of medicine; the statute does not affirmatively authorize cancer, autoimmune disease, Lyme disease, or other systemic-disease diagnosis or treatment.
What this license permits
- Spinal adjustment and manipulation
- Musculoskeletal evaluation and treatment
- Soft-tissue and rehabilitative care
- Headache care within musculoskeletal scope
11 of 11 advertised activities fall outside permitted scope.
| Advertised | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Toxic load hiding in everyday products is a hidden cancer risk factor. This presents a systemic cancer-risk assessment rather than a chiropractic diagnosis or evaluation of a chiropractic condition, which Minnesota law does not affirmatively authorize for chiropractors. | Outside scope |
| Chronic stress measurably suppresses immune function in a way that contributes to cancer taking hold. This is a systemic immunologic and cancer-related medical claim outside the statute’s affirmative authorization for chiropractic services and related diagnosis. | Outside scope |
| Certain foods feed disease while other foods feed immune defense, implying that food choices materially determine cancer progression or prevention. Using dietary advice to determine or alter cancer progression or prevention is systemic disease treatment, not an expressly authorized chiropractic service. | Outside scope |
| Quiet daily inputs accumulating over months and years cause the body to lose the ability to control cancer. This attributes a medical cause to cancer and purports to assess systemic disease mechanisms beyond diagnosis related to chiropractic services. | Outside scope |
| Identifying what is working against the body is presented as the first step toward changing the balance against cancer. The statement advertises identifying and changing causes or progression of cancer, which is not affirmatively authorized within Minnesota’s chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching Advertising alternative cancer coaching represents cancer-directed treatment or management, which Minnesota law does not affirmatively include in chiropractic practice. | Outside scope |
| Listed service #1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic Calling the practice an alternative cancer clinic advertises a cancer-focused medical service outside the chiropractor’s affirmatively authorized chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer This advertises treatment of the cause of cancer or another systemic disease rather than treatment of a condition addressed by chiropractic services. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE Advertising an autoimmune- and Lyme-focused site implies diagnosis or treatment of systemic infectious or immune disease, neither of which Minnesota law affirmatively authorizes for chiropractors. | Outside scope |
| Listed service NON-Cancer? In context, this suggests distinguishing or addressing cancer and non-cancer disease states, which exceeds diagnosis limited to chiropractic services and conditions. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause This is an explicit advertisement for treating cancer’s underlying cause, a medical disease-management service not affirmatively authorized within Minnesota chiropractic practice. | Outside scope |
Sources: Minnesota Statutes § 148.01 — Chiropractic (official), Minnesota Rules § 2500.6000 — Engagement in the Practice of Chiropractic (official), Minnesota Rules § 2500.0200 — Professional Standards for Advertising (official), Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners — Statutes and Rules (official)
Validated associated properties
Surfaces tied to this Doc Bro by domain, branding, or funnel routing. Third-party platforms are labeled as routes, not as owned properties.
Analyzed
- OwnedOperated funnel (go.connersclinic.com)
Tip the jar
Report useful? Optional tips help keep scans, archives, and literature cross-checks running. They never change conclusions.
Submission 7gWOh1bU_yeh7RDHfL5EN
Fight disinformation
Log a public thread where Kevin Sean Conners is spreading nonsense, get a copy-paste reply with this report link.
Reply snippets
Before you buy the protocol: Dr. Trust Me Bro fact-checked Kevin Sean Conners's claims with peer-reviewed sources, https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/7gWOh1bU_yeh7RDHfL5EN. White-coat charisma isn't evidence.
Full DTMB scan on Kevin Sean Conners: https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/7gWOh1bU_yeh7RDHfL5EN
Drop these in YouTube comments, Reddit threads, and forums, link back to this scan, not vibes.
Recent mentions (this doc)
No conversation links logged yet. Be the first above.
Nudge the Doc Bro
We email a public contact address from their site so Kevin Sean Conners can review this dossier and dispute anything we got wrong.
Know someone who can help?
If you think someone has firsthand information about Kevin Sean Conners, send them an encouraging note. We email a short, respectful message with this report and clear instructions on how to write in, on the record or anonymously.
Whambulance
Challenge this scan or Wall of Fame entry for Kevin Sean Conners. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Public challenge log
No posted Wall of Fame challenges linked yet.
Challenges are public on the Wall of Fame card. DTMB does not remove entries for hurt feelings, primary sources or copy corrections only.
File a challenge
Include in your email:
- Doc Bro ID: svh_ABPJ5aDGACIQDNbhy
- Wall entry: /influencer/svh_ABPJ5aDGACIQDNbhy
- Analysis ID: 7gWOh1bU_yeh7RDHfL5EN
- Source: https://www.tiktok.com/@connersclinic/video/7656445984486067469
- Why this entry or scan should change
- Supporting links (one per line)
- Your business email (for verified disputes)
Verified challenges are posted publicly on the report. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Citations
Peer-reviewed and index sources cited in this report.
- [1] Health risks of chemicals in consumer products: A review
- [2] Some Chemicals Present in Industrial and Consumer Products ...
- [3] Identifying Toxic Consumer Products: A Novel Data Set ... - PMC
- [4] Carcinogens off the Shelf? - PMC
- [5] Psychological stress and cancer: new evidence of ... - PMC - NIH
- [6] Psychological stress on cancer progression and ...
- [7] Stress and cancer: The mechanisms of immune dysregulation and ...
- [8] Psychosocial stress and immunosuppression in cancer
- [9] The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: Impact and Future Directions
- [10] World Cancer Research Fund International/American Institute for Cancer Research
- [11] American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors
- [12] Preventing cancer: the role of food, nutrition and physical activity - PubMed
- [13] Triacylglycerol and wax ester-accumulating machinery in prokaryotes.
- [14] Selenium accumulation by plants.
- [15] Dynamic models of choice.
- [16] Interventions for preventing obesity in children
- [17] Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to ...
- [18] Editorial: Hallmark of cancer: tumor promoting inflammation
- [19] Carcinogenic effects of chronic exposure to very low levels of toxic substances
- [20] 2011: the immune hallmarks of cancer - PMC - PubMed Central
- [21] 2011: the immune hallmarks of cancer - PubMed
- [22] Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer - PMC
- [23] 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine : Brussels, Belgium. 15-18 March 2016.
- [24] Glutathione.
- [25] Grief and Prolonged Grief Disorder.
- [26] Gypenoside XLIX targets SIRT1 to block YAP-NLRP3 activation and improve sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.
- [27] Exploring the role of gut microbiome in autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive review.
- [28] The Gut-Brain-Immune Axis: Role of Microbiota Dysbiosis and Autonomic Nervous System in Infectious Diseases.
- [29] Sex- and Age-Specific Distribution of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Paraspinal Muscle Indices and Their Association With Spinal Sagittal Alignment: The Research on Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) Study.
- [30] The performance of free-breathing multiparametric SAturation-recovery single-SHot acquisition T1 and T2 mapping in cardiac allograft rejection.
- [31] Healthy Lifestyle and Cancer Risk: Modifiable Risk Factors to ... - PMC
- [32] Lifestyle Factors and Cancer: A Narrative Review
- [33] Combined lifestyle factors, incident cancer, and ...
- [34] Adherence to Diet and Physical Activity Cancer Prevention Guidelines and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review
- [35] The role of patient-reported outcome measures in ...
- [36] Does Health Coaching Grow Capacity in Cancer Survivors? A Systematic Review - PubMed
- [37] Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side ...
- [38] Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer ...
- [39] RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- [40] The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- [41] SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- [42] Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
- [43] Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline ...
- [44] Cancer
- [45] American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline ...
- [46] Patient Guides Help Your Patients Understand ASCO ...
- [47] [PDF] WHA58.22 Cancer prevention and control
- [48] [PDF] contents | iarc
- [49] Preventing and treating cancer - World Health Organization (WHO)