One post from Kevin Sean Conners's dossier. This page reviews a single piece of material. The full dossier cross-checks 14 materials and carries the verified credential and scope verdicts.
Read the full dossier →/api/archive/snapshots/72bb235eeac2e9281549bfa1689e575417f537553e34fc9eafb2c422ac0c1c72/page.html
View dossier →Kevin Sean Conners alias The Amniotic Alchemist
slangin' hopium at Conners Clinic
Facebook · 100050313826780
Practice location
7582 CURRELL BLVD
WOODBURY, MN 55125
Persuasion and sales-funnel patterns outweigh the evidence here.
- Of 10 health claims, 5 run counter to or conflict with the published evidence, and 3 were not independently checked.
- Primary persuasion tactic: Renowned-expert borrowing.
- Stated credentials look inflated relative to the advice given.
- Gives advice beyond what their license covers.
Conners has assembled the deluxe doc-bro sampler: a renowned-friend introduction, regenerative microvesicles, joint-pain redemption, and a surprise cancer cameo before the clinic links arrive. It is almost elegant—if evidence, credentials, and a financial disclosure had not been edited out of the treatment montage.
Elevated grift signals
Score breakdown
Direct answer
Kevin Sean Conners is licensed in Minnesota as a chiropractor (DC), not as an MD or DO, and Minnesota's chiropractic scope statute (Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 2 and Subd. 4) limits that license to musculoskeletal care, not the diagnosis or treatment of systemic disease. Even so, they advertise diagnosing or treating Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching, #1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic, Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer, NON-Cancer?, and Cancer, conditions that belong with oncologists. Those same pages route patients toward paid programs that Kevin Sean Conners profits from.
Key findings
- False Authority: The description uses status language and the honorific to elevate the guest, but provides no qualifications, evidence, or relevant clinical credentials in the clip itself.see section ↓
- Claim "Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid can help with cancer t…": not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.see section ↓
- Claim "Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid contain microvesicles…": only partially supported.see section ↓
- NPI registry confirms Kevin Conners as Chiropractor (DC) in Minnesota (NPI 1699828210).see section ↓
- Kevin Sean Conners shows credential inflation relative to stated vs likely credentials.see section ↓
- Dr Kevin Sean Conners is marketed with a doctor title, but reviewed credentials indicate Chiropractor (DC) rather than an MD/DO physician license.see section ↓
- Against Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners scope rules (Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 2 and Subd. 4), these advertised activities appear outside Kevin Sean Conners's license (including conditions they merely list as ones they treat): Injectable acellular products derived from purified…see section ↓
- 9 of 9 advertised activities fall outside permitted Chiropractor scope in MN.see section ↓
Claims & evidence
In their own published words, they present themselves as qualified to treat, or give advice on, 9 conditions or treatments. A chiropractic license covers the spine, joints and muscles, and the scope review placed each one outside it. Each box leads with state-board scope notation; literature cross-check follows when we matched a specific claim. Every card carries its receipts: the quoted wording, a live source link, and an archived copy.
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid can help with cancer treatment..
Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid can help with cancer treatment.
- Supports
- Preclinical studies and narrative reviews suggest that amniotic-fluid-derived cells or extracellular vesicles may have anticancer effects in cultured cancer cells and animal models, including effects on proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, or tumor growth. However, these findings concern cells, engineered cells, or extracellular vesicles rather than injectable purified acellular amniotic fluid products, and they do not establish clinical cancer-treatment efficacy.
- Contradicts
- The directly relevant review states that perinatal derivatives, including amniotic-fluid products, are far from inclusion in clinical oncology and may have both antitumor and tumor-promoting effects. A review of cell-free amniotic fluid describes exploratory uses in conditions such as wounds, osteoarthritis, and COVID-19, but does not provide evidence that purified injectable acellular amniotic fluid treats cancer; the review also notes regulatory restrictions on marketed amniotic-fluid injectables. No high-quality randomized cancer trial, systematic review, or major oncology guideline supports this claim. The cited results are largely unrelated to cancer or concern different interventions, such as amniotic-fluid-derived stem cells or acellular products for diabetic foot ulcers, so they cannot validate the stated treatment claim.
- Mainstream view
- Injectable purified acellular amniotic fluid is not an established cancer treatment. Laboratory and animal research on selected amniotic-fluid-derived cells or extracellular vesicles is experimental, with uncertain efficacy, product standardization, safety, and possible tumor-promoting effects. Patients should not substitute such products for evidence-based cancer therapy outside a properly regulated clinical trial.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][4]
“how it can help with cancer treatment”
Rule: Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 2 and Subd. 4
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Cancer
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching.
Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching
- Supports
- No specific peer-reviewed evidence or clinical trial in the listed results evaluates Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching. General cancer health-coaching research suggests possible improvements in quality of life, mood, and physical activity among cancer survivors, but it does not establish that this named program is licensed or treats cancer.
- Contradicts
- The listed papers are unrelated clinical-trial registrations and provide no evidence that Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching is a licensed cancer treatment. Evidence reviews distinguish supportive complementary care from alternative therapies claimed to treat tumors; alternative cancer treatments generally lack convincing evidence of safety and efficacy. Use of complementary medicine associated with refusal of conventional treatment has been associated with substantially higher mortality, although this does not specifically evaluate this clinic.
- Mainstream view
- The statement is not a sufficiently specified medical efficacy claim, and no basis is provided to verify that the named service is licensed. Cancer coaching may offer supportive education or psychosocial help when delivered by appropriately qualified professionals, but it should not be represented as an alternative cancer treatment or as a substitute for oncology care. Licensing must be verified through the relevant jurisdiction and professional regulator.
Papers listed for this claim:[5][6][7][8]
“Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching”
Rule: Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 1 and Subd. 4
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Cancer
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure #1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic.
#1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“#1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer.
Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer
- Supports
- Addressing causes and risk factors can prevent some cancers before they develop, including tobacco exposure, obesity, alcohol use, carcinogenic infections, and ultraviolet radiation. However, this is prevention rather than evidence that an established cancer should be treated only by addressing its cause. The listed papers are methods and trial-registration papers and do not provide evidence supporting this treatment claim.
- Contradicts
- For diagnosed cancer, major medical guidance recommends cancer-directed treatment such as surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, or combinations, selected according to cancer type and stage. The WHO distinguishes prevention from treatment and states that patients who develop cancer require appropriate treatment and care, commonly including surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Treating a causal or contributing condition may be an important component of care in selected cancers, but it does not generally replace treatment of the malignant tumor. Evidence for a universal strategy of treating the cause instead of the cancer is absent from the listed papers; the albumin sepsis review is unrelated to cancer treatment.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream oncology position is to identify and address modifiable causes and comorbidities while providing evidence-based cancer-directed treatment when cancer is diagnosed. Cause-directed interventions can prevent some cancers or complement treatment in specific situations, but the slogan as stated misleadingly implies that treating the cause should take priority over or substitute for treating established cancer.
Papers listed for this claim:[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]
“Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer”
Rule: Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 1 and Subd. 2
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Cancer
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE as within their scope of practice.
Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE”
Rule: Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 1 and Subd. 4
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Lyme disease
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure NON-Cancer?.
NON-Cancer?
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“NON-Cancer?”
Rule: Minnesota Chiropractic Practice Act (scope limited to musculoskeletal/spine care)
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause.
Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause
- Supports
- Addressing causes and risk factors can prevent some cancers or reduce cancer incidence; WHO estimates that 30% to 50% of cancer cases are preventable through measures such as tobacco control, vaccination, and reducing harmful exposures. However, this supports prevention, not replacing treatment after cancer has developed.
- Contradicts
- The claim is too broad and implies that cancer-directed treatment should be abandoned in favor of treating an unspecified cause. Evidence-based cancer care uses surgery, radiotherapy, systemic medicines, immunotherapy, and combinations chosen according to cancer type and stage. These treatments can cure some cancers, prolong survival, or provide palliation. The listed papers do not provide direct evidence that treating an unspecified underlying cause can replace standard cancer treatment; most are unrelated to cancer, and the NSCLC trial listing is only a trial record rather than evidence establishing such a general strategy.
- Mainstream view
- Cancer has diverse causes and biological mechanisms, so prevention and management of relevant risk factors are important but generally cannot substitute for diagnosis and cancer-directed treatment. Major medical guidance supports individualized, multidisciplinary treatment based on tumor type, stage, and patient factors, alongside prevention, supportive care, and palliative care. As stated, the slogan is unsupported and potentially dangerous if interpreted as advice to delay or refuse proven cancer treatment.
Papers listed for this claim:[14][17][18][19]
“Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause”
Rule: Minnesota Statutes 148.01, Subd. 1 and Subd. 2
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Cancer
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid contain microvesicles that promote healing and can improve mobility and function for joint problems without drugs or surgery. as within their scope of practice.
Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid contain microvesicles that promote healing and can improve mobility and function for joint problems without drugs or surgery.
- Supports
- Some randomized trials of amniotic suspension or amniotic tissue injections in knee osteoarthritis reported improvements in pain and patient-reported function compared with saline or hyaluronic acid at selected follow-up points. A separate randomized study found similar short-term improvement with amniotic tissue and corticosteroid, with possible greater maintenance of improvement at one year, although overall between-group differences were not statistically significant. These findings provide limited support for possible symptom and function improvement from some intra-articular amniotic products without surgery. The listed paper concerning exosome-containing acellular amniotic membrane reports enhanced diabetic wound healing, not injectable purified amniotic fluid for joint disease, so it does not directly support this claim.
- Contradicts
- The cited literature does not establish that purified amniotic fluid products specifically contain clinically active microvesicles in a standardized, therapeutically relevant formulation, nor that microvesicles are the cause of joint improvement. Evidence for extracellular vesicles in osteoarthritis is largely mechanistic or preclinical rather than clinical. Several studies of amniotic products are nonrandomized, retrospective, pilot, or heterogeneous, and reviews describe limited or mixed clinical evidence. Reported benefits in knee osteoarthritis do not prove effectiveness for unspecified joint problems, do not demonstrate disease modification or healing of damaged joints, and do not show that treatment works broadly without other drugs, rehabilitation, or eventual surgery. The remaining listed papers concern blood-derived products in dental surgery, social support, sleep, or peer review and do not directly assess this intervention.
- Mainstream view
- Amniotic-derived injections remain investigational or insufficiently established for routine treatment of joint disorders. Some controlled knee osteoarthritis studies suggest short-term symptom and function benefits for particular amniotic suspension or tissue products, but products differ substantially and high-quality independent replication, standardized characterization, longer-term outcomes, and evidence across joints are lacking. Mainstream care therefore does not regard injectable purified amniotic fluid microvesicles as proven healing therapy or as a demonstrated replacement for indicated medications, rehabilitation, or surgery.
Papers listed for this claim:[20][21][22][23]
“acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid, which contain microvesicles that promote healing”
Kevin Sean Conners is not licensed or approved by Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Injectable regenerative therapies can treat joint issues and inflammation. as within their scope of practice.
Injectable regenerative therapies can treat joint issues and inflammation.
- Supports
- For knee osteoarthritis, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials suggest that platelet-rich plasma injections can provide short- to medium-term improvements in pain and function compared with placebo or hyaluronic acid, although effects vary by preparation, comparator, and disease severity. Some meta-analyses also report symptomatic benefit from mesenchymal-cell injections, particularly over follow-up periods of up to 12 months.
- Contradicts
- The listed papers are unrelated clinical-trial registrations and provide no evidence for injectable regenerative therapies treating joint disease or inflammation. High-quality reviews describe stem-cell efficacy and cartilage-repair evidence as limited, with small samples, short follow-up, publication-bias concerns, and unknown long-term safety; they do not support widespread clinical use. Evidence for PRP is heterogeneous, and major guidelines remain cautious, uncertain, or do not recommend routine use because of insufficient or inconsistent evidence. The claim is broad: evidence mainly concerns symptoms of selected osteoarthritis, especially knee osteoarthritis, rather than joint issues generally, inflammatory diseases generally, or proven regeneration. There is no established high-quality evidence that these injections reliably repair joints or broadly treat inflammation.
- Mainstream view
- Some injectable biologic products, especially PRP, may offer modest symptomatic relief for selected patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis after conventional management, but they are not established universal regenerative treatments. Mesenchymal stem-cell and other cell-based injections remain investigational or insufficiently supported for routine care, and claims of reliable joint regeneration or broad anti-inflammatory treatment exceed the evidence. Treatment should be diagnosis-specific, product-specific, and discussed with a qualified clinician.
Papers listed for this claim:[24][25][26][27]
“discuss regenerative therapies and cutting-edge treatments for joint pain and inflammation”
Manipulation
transcript · cited
The description uses status language and the honorific to elevate the guest, but provides no qualifications, evidence, or relevant clinical credentials in the clip itself. Likely motive: Borrowed authority can make an experimental or weakly supported treatment appear clinically established.
“renowned expert Dr. Jeff Donatello”
transcript · cited
Calling the product next-generation frames it as advanced and effective without identifying regulatory status, trial quality, comparative outcomes, or established clinical indications. Likely motive: Innovation language can substitute for evidence and increase interest in a potentially expensive intervention.
“next-generation therapy”
transcript · cited
Mentioning cancer alongside a joint-pain injectable expands the emotional and medical stakes, while the clip gives no cancer-specific evidence, indication, or safety context. Likely motive: Cancer-related hope and urgency can make viewers more receptive to an otherwise inadequately supported therapy.
“how it can help with cancer treatment”
transcript · cited
The clip routes viewers to a clinic-controlled short link, creating a direct path from a promotional health claim to the subject's own commercial ecosystem. Likely motive: The link may convert curiosity about pain or cancer into consultations, procedures, or other paid services.
“Visit https://go.connersclinic.com/qua for more information.”
Borrowed authority: Jeff Donatello
guestCollaboration · conflation
Framed as renowned expert and long-time friend of Kevin Conners. Brought on to discuss Regenerative therapies, injectable acellular amniotic-fluid products, joint pain, inflammation, and possible cancer-treatment use. Topic sits outside the host's own scope.
“Dr. Kevin Conners welcomed his long-time friend and renowned expert Dr. Jeff Donatello”
Commerce & grift map
The visible funnel is promotional content about amniotic-fluid injectables and cancer-adjacent benefits leading to clinic-controlled links. No supplement stack, lab upsell, affiliate program, or explicit kickback is shown, but the absence of an on-surface financial disclosure leaves the commercial relationship unclear.
No FTC-style compensation disclosure
compensationDisclosures · scan
Host self-funnel around guest content
guestCollaboration · selfFunnel
Host booking/consult links: https://go.connersclinic.com/d, https://go.connersclinic.com/d07, https://go.connersclinic.com/qua
Credentials & scope
Glossary: Chiropractor (“Dr.”)
Learn: Is a chiropractor a medical doctor?
Credentials and scope reflect the dossier-wide determination for this subject, drawn from the strongest verified material across every analyzed source.
Stated: DR · Likely: Chiropractor
Verified against the federal provider registry: D.C. · Chiropractor · MN license 2372.
Kevin Conners appears to lean on a non-physician doctorate plus a pile of fellowships/certifications to project broad medical authority. The problem is not the title itself; it is using that narrow authority to market cancer, Lyme, autoimmune, detox, and genetics services as if it were general oncology or internal medicine.
- D.PSc., Doctor of Professional Studies in Chiropractic / related professional doctorate
A doctorate-level credential, but not an MD/DO medical license. It does not by itself authorize general diagnosis and treatment of systemic disease.
A chiropractic-related doctorate generally does not expand state scope beyond chiropractic practice and allowed adjunctive wellness counseling; it does not make the holder an oncologist or internist.
Permitted scope vs advertised
Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners · Confidence: high
Minnesota chiropractors are authorized to perform chiropractic services (spinal adjustment, manipulation, mobilization for vertebral subluxation and related conditions), acupuncture (as adjunct only), therapeutic/rehabilitative services, and diagnosis within the scope of chiropractic practice. The practice of chiropractic explicitly excludes medicine, surgery, osteopathic medicine, and physical therapy. Therapeutic services must be performed within a practice where the primary focus is chiropractic services, to prepare for chiropractic services, or to complement chiropractic services.
What this license permits
- Spinal adjustment and manipulation
- Musculoskeletal evaluation and treatment
- Soft-tissue and rehabilitative care
- Headache care within musculoskeletal scope
9 of 9 advertised activities fall outside permitted scope.
| Advertised | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid can help with cancer treatment. Cancer treatment is a systemic disease management claim that falls outside chiropractic scope; Minnesota law limits chiropractors to structural/biomechanical/neurological function via adjustment and manipulation, and explicitly excludes the practice of medicine. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Conners Clinic Alternative Cancer Coaching Cancer coaching and alternative cancer management are outside chiropractic scope; chiropractors are not authorized to manage or coach treatment of systemic diseases like cancer. | Outside scope |
| Listed service #1 Trusted Alternative Cancer Clinic Marketing as an alternative cancer clinic positions the practice as treating cancer, a systemic disease outside chiropractic scope; chiropractors are not authorized to be primary cancer treatment providers. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Treat the CAUSE, not the Cancer This claim implies treating cancer by addressing its underlying cause, which is systemic disease management outside chiropractic scope; chiropractors are limited to structural and biomechanical conditions. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Visit our Autoimmune and Lyme site HERE Autoimmune disease and Lyme disease are systemic conditions outside chiropractic scope; chiropractors are not authorized to treat or manage these diseases as primary conditions. | Outside scope |
| Listed service NON-Cancer? Rule: Minnesota Chiropractic Practice Act (scope limited to musculoskeletal/spine care) | Outside scope |
| Listed service Stop Fighting Cancer & Start Treating the Cause This claim implies the chiropractor treats cancer by addressing its cause, which is systemic disease management outside chiropractic scope; chiropractors are limited to structural and biomechanical conditions. | Outside scope |
| Injectable acellular products derived from purified amniotic fluid contain microvesicles that promote healing and can improve mobility and function for joint problems without drugs or surgery. Injectable biologic products are not within chiropractic scope; Minnesota law limits chiropractors to adjustment, manipulation, mobilization, and manual/mechanical procedures, not injectable therapeutics. | Outside scope |
| Injectable regenerative therapies can treat joint issues and inflammation. Injectable regenerative therapies are not within chiropractic scope; Minnesota law limits chiropractors to manual or mechanical procedures applied to bones and joints, not injectable therapeutics. | Outside scope |
Sources: Minnesota Statutes Chapter 148 - Chiropractic (official), Minnesota Statutes 148.01 - Chiropractic (official), Minnesota Rules Part 2500.0100 (official), Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners - Statutes and Rules (official)
Validated associated properties
Surfaces tied to this Doc Bro by domain, branding, or funnel routing. Third-party platforms are labeled as routes, not as owned properties.
Analyzed
- OwnedOperated funnel (go.connersclinic.com)
Tip the jar
Report useful? Optional tips help keep scans, archives, and literature cross-checks running. They never change conclusions.
Submission SdLVm3w4Hbj9FeMbcjpeg
Fight disinformation
Log a public thread where Kevin Sean Conners is spreading nonsense, get a copy-paste reply with this report link.
Reply snippets
Before you buy the protocol: Dr. Trust Me Bro fact-checked Kevin Sean Conners's claims with peer-reviewed sources, https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/SdLVm3w4Hbj9FeMbcjpeg. White-coat charisma isn't evidence.
Full DTMB scan on Kevin Sean Conners: https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/SdLVm3w4Hbj9FeMbcjpeg
Drop these in YouTube comments, Reddit threads, and forums, link back to this scan, not vibes.
Recent mentions (this doc)
No conversation links logged yet. Be the first above.
Nudge the Doc Bro
We email a public contact address from their site so Kevin Sean Conners can review this dossier and dispute anything we got wrong.
Know someone who can help?
If you think someone has firsthand information about Kevin Sean Conners, send them an encouraging note. We email a short, respectful message with this report and clear instructions on how to write in, on the record or anonymously.
Whambulance
Challenge this scan or Wall of Fame entry for Kevin Sean Conners. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Public challenge log
No posted Wall of Fame challenges linked yet.
Challenges are public on the Wall of Fame card. DTMB does not remove entries for hurt feelings, primary sources or copy corrections only.
File a challenge
Include in your email:
- Doc Bro ID: svh_ABPJ5aDGACIQDNbhy
- Wall entry: /influencer/svh_ABPJ5aDGACIQDNbhy
- Analysis ID: SdLVm3w4Hbj9FeMbcjpeg
- Source: https://www.facebook.com/connersclinic/posts/pfbid0n6R5DBAvmWAs5qqT43shqGVPvucReGZb4bWbFuVG6DK2WiRmcNHYeSPUGQuPfRJEl
- Why this entry or scan should change
- Supporting links (one per line)
- Your business email (for verified disputes)
Verified challenges are posted publicly on the report. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Citations
Peer-reviewed and index sources cited in this report.
- [1] Evaluation of exosome derivatives as bio-informational reprogramming therapy for cancer
- [2] Application of Perinatal Derivatives on Oncological Preclinical ...
- [3] An update clinical application of amniotic fluid-derived stem cells (AFSCs) in cancer cell therapy and tissue engineering - PubMed
- [4] Amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells: characteristics and therapeutic applications
- [5] The role of patient-reported outcome measures in ...
- [6] Does Health Coaching Grow Capacity in Cancer Survivors? A Systematic Review - PubMed
- [7] Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side ...
- [8] Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer ...
- [9] RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- [10] The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- [11] SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- [12] Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
- [13] Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline ...
- [14] Cancer
- [15] American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline ...
- [16] Patient Guides Help Your Patients Understand ASCO ...
- [17] [PDF] WHA58.22 Cancer prevention and control
- [18] [PDF] contents | iarc
- [19] Preventing and treating cancer - World Health Organization (WHO)
- [20] Amniotic Tissue Injections Are an Effective Alternative to ...
- [21] Allogenic Amniotic Tissue for Treatment of Knee and Hip ...
- [22] Amniotic Suspension Allograft for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
- [23] An Initial Injection and a Crossover Injection of Amniotic ...
- [24] Platelet-Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Therapies for ... - PMC
- [25] PRP Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis - PMC
- [26] A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials and News Media
- [27] What Is the Evidence for the Clinical Use of Stem Cell-based ...