Jason Kaufman alias Dr. Nutrition Cancer

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Dr. Jason Kaufman specializes in tackling weight loss resistance and chronic degenerative diseases, focusing on heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and Alzheimer’s..

Dr. Jason Kaufman specializes in tackling weight loss resistance and chronic degenerative diseases, focusing on heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and Alzheimer’s.

Supports

None of the indexed peer-reviewed articles relate to Dr. Jason Kaufman, his training, or his clinical scope; they address general guidelines on hypertension, nutrition, transfusion, and pericarditis, not individual physician specialization. ^{[2][3][4][7][8]} A broader academic and guideline search establishes that weight loss resistance, obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease are major chronic conditions commonly managed in internal medicine, endocrinology, cardiology, oncology, and neurology, but these sources do not individually verify Kaufman’s claimed focus or specialty. Therefore, there is no direct high‑quality evidence confirming that Dr. ^[6] Jason Kaufman “specializes” in tackling weight loss resistance and chronic degenerative diseases.

Contradicts

The indexed papers and additional academic search provide no biographical or credentialing data about Dr. Jason Kaufman, and do not list him as an author or guideline contributor in hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, or Alzheimer’s. ^[1][2] This absence does not prove he lacks such a focus but contradicts any implication that his specialization is established or endorsed in the peer‑reviewed or guideline literature. ^[5] The concept of “weight loss resistance” as an independent, well‑defined medical specialty is not recognized in major guidelines, which instead discuss obesity, metabolic syndrome, and related conditions; this weakens the claim that it represents a formal specialization validated by high‑quality evidence. ^[3][6] Overall, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the influencer’s specific claims about this individual’s specialty or scope of practice.

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and scientific standards define a physician’s specialization by accredited residency and fellowship training, board certification, and recognized clinical or academic appointments, not by influencer descriptions or marketing claims. ^[3] High‑quality evidence and major guidelines clearly outline how chronic conditions such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and Alzheimer’s are typically managed within established specialties (e. ^[1][6] g. , internal medicine, cardiology, endocrinology, neurology, oncology), but they do not specify or endorse individual doctors like Dr. Jason Kaufman. The mainstream position is that claims about a physician’s specialization require verification through formal credentials and institutional affiliations, not social media statements, and that the term “weight loss resistance” lacks status as a distinct, guideline‑recognized specialty. ^[5]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Dr. Jason Kaufman specializes in tackling weight loss resistance and chronic degenerative diseases, focusing on heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and Alzheimer’s.”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a), (e)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Cancer

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Lyme Testing.

Lyme Testing

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Lyme Testing”

Rule: N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(d)(2)

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Thyroid Disorders.

Thyroid Disorders

Supports

There are no high-quality randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or major endocrine guidelines showing that chiropractic spinal manipulation is an effective primary treatment for thyroid disorders (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, autoimmune thyroid disease, thyroid nodules, or thyroid cancer). The only directly relevant clinical trial I can identify is a protocol for a pilot RCT of Neuro-Emotional Technique (a biopsychosocial/chiropractic-linked modality) added to usual care in overt hypothyroidism, which is designed to look at mood and thyroid lab changes but does not yet provide results; this shows interest in studying adjunctive non-pharmacologic approaches but does not constitute evidence of efficacy at this stage.^[14] Case reports and small case series from chiropractic-oriented journals describe individual patients whose thyroid function or medication requirements appeared to improve during chiropractic care, but these are uncontrolled, low-quality observations and not high-quality evidence.^[13][17][23]

Contradicts

Major, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for thyroid disease consistently recommend pharmacologic and/or surgical management as the standard of care and do not endorse chiropractic manipulation as a treatment for thyroid disorders.^{[16][18][19][20][21][22][25]} For primary hypothyroidism, guidelines emphasize diagnosis based on thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine, and treatment with levothyroxine titrated to normalize TSH and relieve symptoms; they specifically discuss dose ranges, monitoring intervals, and target TSH, but do not include chiropractic care in any treatment algorithms.^{[12][16][20][21][25]} These guidelines are built from systematic reviews and high-quality evidence, and state that alternative preparations (e.g., natural thyroid extract) are not recommended, reinforcing that thyroid hormone replacement—not musculoskeletal manipulation—is the evidence-based therapy.^[12][15][20] Current thyroid disease guidelines for pregnancy and postpartum similarly focus on appropriate thyroid hormone replacement, antithyroid drugs, and surgery or radioiodine where indicated, again without any role for chiropractic as treatment.^[18][19] More broadly, guideline methodologies such as GRADE emphasize that low-quality, imprecise evidence (e.g., case reports and uncontrolled series) cannot support strong treatment recommendations, which applies directly to the chiropractic thyroid case literature.^[5][6]

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that chiropractic care is not an evidence-based treatment for thyroid disorders and should not be relied on to manage hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, autoimmune thyroid disease, thyroid nodules, or thyroid cancer. Thyroid diseases are diagnosed and managed primarily by physicians (often endocrinologists) using standardized biochemical testing (TSH, free T4, free T3, antibodies) and imaging, with treatment centered on thyroid hormone replacement (e.g., levothyroxine), antithyroid medications, radioiodine, or surgery depending on the specific condition, guided by national and international clinical practice guidelines.^{[16][18][19][20][21][22][25]} These guidelines are based on systematic reviews and high-quality trials and do not recommend chiropractic manipulation either as primary therapy or as a routine adjunct for modifying thyroid physiology or disease course.^{[15][20][21][25]} Within mainstream practice, chiropractic may be considered for musculoskeletal complaints (e.g., neck or back pain) but not as a therapeutic modality for endocrine disorders like thyroid disease; any use of chiropractic in patients with thyroid disease is viewed, at most, as supportive for general musculoskeletal well-being, not as a treatment that can correct thyroid hormone abnormalities or replace guideline-directed medical care.^{[16][20][21][25]}

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Thyroid Disorders”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Thyroid disease and Hashimoto

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Diabetes & Blood Sugar.

Diabetes & Blood Sugar

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Diabetes & Blood Sugar”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Diabetes and blood sugar

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Autoimmune Disease.

Autoimmune Disease

Supports

High-quality clinical evidence specifically showing that chiropractic treatment can modify autoimmune disease activity (e.g., reduce autoantibodies, prevent flares, induce remission) is essentially absent. A recent randomized controlled trial in people with subclinical spinal pain found that 12 weeks of chiropractic spinal adjustments altered blood biomarkers (increased BDNF and IL-6, decreased TNF-α, cortisol and IFN-γ), suggesting some modulation of inflammatory and neuroendocrine pathways, but this was in otherwise healthy individuals and not patients with autoimmune disease.^[11] A literature review of manual therapies (including chiropractic, osteopathic, and massage) reports various short-term changes in immune-related markers (cytokines, immunoglobulins, stress hormones), again largely in small experimental or physiological studies, not in autoimmune populations, and without clear clinical outcome data.^{[12][13][17][20]} Guidelines for autoimmune conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease emphasize evidence-based pharmacologic and nutritional management (e.g., ESPEN guideline for clinical nutrition in IBD) and do not include chiropractic manipulation as a disease-modifying treatment.^[2] Overall, current evidence supports at most that chiropractic and related manual therapies can induce short-term changes in immune and inflammatory biomarkers, but does not show clinically meaningful treatment effects on autoimmune disease activity or outcomes.

Contradicts

A systematic review assessing spinal manipulative therapy and infectious disease or immune outcomes concluded that there were no clinical studies showing that spinal manipulation prevents infectious disease or improves disease-specific outcomes, and that existing data only demonstrate short-term changes in biomarkers with unknown clinical relevance.^[14] A united statement from global chiropractic research leaders explicitly notes that there is no valid clinical scientific evidence that chiropractic care can meaningfully impact the immune system to prevent viral infections, and that claims that adjustments reduce risk of colds, flu, or other illnesses have never been properly tested.^[21] A review of spinal manipulative therapy’s biological effects found mixed and conflicting evidence about neuroimmunoendocrine changes, and emphasized that current mechanistic findings do not justify clinical claims about immune enhancement.^[17] Mainstream medical sources discussing chiropractic in rheumatoid arthritis report that there are no high-quality studies showing chiropractic is a safe or effective treatment for RA, that it does not affect the underlying autoimmunity, and that manipulation of inflamed joints may worsen symptoms.^[25] Major clinical guidelines for autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, such as nutrition guidelines in IBD, highlight pharmacologic therapies, nutrition, and other evidence-based interventions, with no role for chiropractic as a disease-modifying treatment.^[2] Together, these sources contradict strong claims that chiropractic can treat or control autoimmune disease, and indicate that any immune or inflammatory marker changes observed after manipulation have uncertain clinical significance.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that autoimmune diseases are primarily managed with evidence-based pharmacologic therapies (e.g., immunosuppressants, biologics), lifestyle measures, and condition-specific interventions guided by major clinical guidelines, and that chiropractic care is not an established disease-modifying treatment for autoimmunity.^[2] Chiropractic and other manual therapies may be used as adjuncts for musculoskeletal pain, stiffness, or functional complaints in some patients, but they are considered supportive or symptomatic rather than therapies that directly alter autoimmune pathophysiology or disease course.^[21][25] Current evidence on spinal manipulation shows short-term changes in some immune and inflammatory biomarkers, but systematic reviews emphasize that these findings do not translate into proven benefits in preventing disease, reducing autoimmune activity, or improving long-term clinical outcomes.^[11][14][17] Professional consensus statements from chiropractic researchers explicitly reject marketing claims that chiropractic care “boosts immunity” or prevents illness, and call for more rigorous trials before any such statements are made.^[14][21] For autoimmune diseases specifically (such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease), mainstream guidance does not recommend chiropractic as a primary treatment, and warns that manipulation of actively inflamed joints or unstable spines may pose risks.^[2][25]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Autoimmune Disease”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Autoimmune disease

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Anxiety & Depression.

Anxiety & Depression

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Anxiety & Depression”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Depression

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Infertility.

Infertility

Supports

High-quality evidence directly supporting chiropractic treatment as an effective therapy for infertility is essentially absent. ^[7] The available literature consists almost entirely of case reports and small case series in which women with prior infertility became pregnant after starting chiropractic care; these reports show temporal association but cannot demonstrate causation or efficacy. ^[20] A scoping review of chiropractic management in female infertility found only ten case studies involving 11 women, all without controls or randomization, and concluded that pregnancy occurred after chiropractic care but that the evidence base was limited to low-level observational reports and no adverse events were reported. ^{[1][17][18][19]} This type of evidence is considered very low quality under GRADE methodology, with substantial imprecision and risk of bias, and does not meet the standards required to support a treatment claim. ^[5][6]

Contradicts

The main contradiction is that there are no randomized controlled trials, large prospective cohorts, or systematic reviews showing that chiropractic treatment improves infertility outcomes, which is expected for a claim of therapeutic efficacy. ^[5][20] Existing case reports and series are uncontrolled, susceptible to placebo effects, regression to the mean, spontaneous conception, and concurrent medical or lifestyle interventions, making it impossible to attribute pregnancy to chiropractic care. ^[18] A scoping review explicitly notes the lack of higher-level studies and calls for rigorous trials before any conclusions about efficacy can be drawn, emphasizing that current evidence cannot establish chiropractic as an infertility treatment. ^[6][17] General principles of evidence grading highlight that such small, uncontrolled case reports represent very low-certainty evidence and should not be used to support strong clinical claims. ^[3] Major infertility management relies on evidence‑based interventions such as ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination, IVF/ICSI, and hormonal or surgical treatments, none of which include chiropractic manipulation as a recommended modality. ^[1][19] High-quality RCTs and guidelines in other areas of medicine (e. g. , hypertension, clinical nutrition, pericarditis) illustrate how therapies become accepted only after robust trials and guideline review, a process that chiropractic for infertility has not undergone. ^[2][4][8]

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and scientific opinion is that chiropractic care is not an established or recommended treatment for infertility. ^[17][18][20] Conventional reproductive medicine views infertility as a multifactorial condition requiring evaluation of ovulatory function, tubal patency, uterine factors, male factor, endocrine and metabolic status, and sometimes immunologic or genetic issues; evidence‑based interventions are pharmacologic (e. ^[1][19] g. , ovulation induction), procedural (e. g. , IVF/ICSI), or surgical, guided by high‑quality clinical trials and consensus guidelines, none of which endorse chiropractic manipulation as a fertility therapy. ^[3][6][7] Chiropractic may have a role in managing musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy or in general, but current evidence does not support using it to treat infertility itself. Case reports suggesting benefit are considered hypothesis‑generating only and insufficient to change practice or guideline recommendations under standard evidence‑grading frameworks such as GRADE.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Infertility”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Infertility

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Menopause/Hormone Imbalances.

Menopause/Hormone Imbalances

Supports

High-quality evidence supports menopausal symptom treatment with menopausal hormone therapy and some nonhormonal options, not chiropractic care. ^[7] The menopause guideline review found that the highest-quality clinical practice guidelines consistently recommend menopausal hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms and menopause-associated mood disturbance, and not for cardiometabolic disease or dementia prevention . ^{[3][2][5][6][21][23]} The North American Menopause Society position statement says there have been no clinical trials of chiropractic interventions for vasomotor symptoms and that chiropractic interventions are not recommended for treatment of vasomotor symptoms . ^[24] A review of menopause therapies also states that there are no supporting quality data for chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation in the treatment of menopause . ^[22]

Contradicts

The claim that chiropractors treat menopause or hormone imbalances is not supported by the indexed evidence. ^[6] The menopause review found no clinical trial evidence for chiropractic interventions for vasomotor symptoms and no association in epidemiologic data . ^{[3][21][22][23]} The earlier review of chiropractic intervention for postmenopausal climacteric symptoms and insomnia reported no evidence for effectiveness of chiropractic intervention as a complementary or alternative therapy for menopausal symptoms and insomnia . ^[7][24] Evidence that sometimes appears relevant is indirect and low quality, such as a small randomized trial in premenstrual syndrome, which is a different condition than menopause . Some recent reviews of manual therapy or nonstandard interventions address musculoskeletal pain or alternative modalities, but they do not establish chiropractic treatment as a therapy for menopausal hormone imbalance or core menopausal symptoms .

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical view is that chiropractic care is not an evidence-based treatment for menopause or hormone imbalance. ^{[1][5][6][24]} Standard management of menopausal symptoms centers on menopausal hormone therapy when appropriate, and on selected nonhormonal therapies for vasomotor symptoms and related complaints; chiropractic may be used only, if at all, for separate musculoskeletal issues, not for correcting hormones or treating menopause itself . ^{[4][7][21][22][23]}

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Menopause/Hormone Imbalances”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Hormone imbalance and replacement

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Lyme.

Lyme

Supports

The peer-reviewed and guideline evidence supports antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease, not chiropractic care. ^{[1][2][5][6][26][27][28]} Major guidelines identify doxycycline, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, or ceftriaxone as standard therapy depending on disease stage and manifestation, with treatment durations typically 7 to 28 days. ^[3][7] The IDSA/AAN/ACR guideline states that Lyme disease is treated with antimicrobials active against Borrelia burgdorferi and gives specific antibiotic regimens for erythema migrans and disseminated disease. ^[25] NICE likewise recommends antibiotics for diagnosed Lyme disease across neurologic, cardiac, and skin presentations.

Contradicts

There is no high-quality evidence in the provided index papers supporting chiropractic treatment as a treatment for Lyme disease. ^{[6][26][27][28]} The indexed guideline papers on hypertension, nutrition, headache, transfusion, and pericarditis do not support this claim because they are unrelated to Lyme disease. ^{[1][2][5][4][7][8]} The broader evidence base and major clinical guidelines identify antibiotics as the only proven treatment, and do not include chiropractic manipulation as a treatment for the infection. ^[3][25] Chiropractic care may be used for musculoskeletal pain in some contexts, but that is not evidence that it treats the underlying Lyme infection; no RCTs or systematic reviews establishing chiropractic treatment of Lyme disease were identified in the gathered evidence.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical view is that Lyme disease is an infectious disease treated with appropriate antibiotics, and chiropractic care is not a recognized or evidence-based treatment for the infection itself. ^{[5][4][6][25][26][27][28]} If a patient has persistent pain or functional symptoms after Lyme disease, management should follow guideline-based medical evaluation rather than relying on chiropractic treatment as disease therapy. ^[1][2][7]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Lyme”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Lyme disease

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

Supports

There are no high-quality randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews showing that chiropractic spinal manipulation is an effective treatment for IBS specifically. ^[32] A narrative review of chiropractic for gastrointestinal disorders concluded that there is no supportive evidence that chiropractic is an effective treatment for gastrointestinal problems, based primarily on small, low-quality and heterogeneous studies. ^[29][30][31] Independent systematic reviews of spinal manipulation more broadly also classify the evidence for gastrointestinal disorders (including IBS) as unclear or inconclusive. In contrast, there is emerging low- to moderate-quality evidence that other manual therapies, particularly osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) or visceral osteopathy, may offer some short-term symptom improvement in IBS (pain, bloating, global assessment), but these are not chiropractic techniques and the trials are small and at risk of bias. ^[5][6] A 2014 systematic review of osteopathic manipulative therapy for IBS found preliminary beneficial effects but emphasized the limited number of small studies and need for caution in interpretation. ^[7] More recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of OMT in IBS continue to describe the overall certainty of evidence as low to very low due to small sample sizes, methodological limitations, and inconsistent outcome measures, even though pooled analyses sometimes suggest benefit on pain or constipation. Clinical guidelines and evidence-based pathways for IBS management, such as those from major gastroenterology societies, focus on diet (e. ^[1][3] g. , low FODMAP diet), pharmacologic therapies, gut-directed psychotherapies, and in some cases probiotics or neuromodulators; they do not recommend chiropractic care as a treatment option for IBS.

Contradicts

The best-quality syntheses specifically examining chiropractic for gastrointestinal disorders, including IBS, conclude that there is no convincing evidence of efficacy and that existing trials are few, small, and methodologically weak. ^{[6][29][30][31]} Systematic reviews of spinal manipulation across conditions classify the evidence for gastrointestinal indications as inconclusive rather than supportive, and explicitly note no supportive evidence that chiropractic is effective for gastrointestinal disorders. ^[32] This directly contradicts any strong claim that chiropractic treatment is an evidence-based therapy for IBS. ^[1][7] In addition, contemporary IBS management guidelines from major professional bodies do not include chiropractic or spinal manipulation among recommended therapies, which indirectly indicates that the evidence base is considered insufficient or unconvincing compared with established options. ^[3] Compared with interventions that do have replicated RCTs and are incorporated into guidelines (such as dietary modification, certain pharmacologic agents, psychological therapies, and in some cases probiotics), chiropractic lacks comparable data for IBS. Overall, the available literature suggests that claims of reliable IBS symptom relief from chiropractic care are not supported by robust clinical evidence, and that the evidence base is markedly weaker than for standard IBS treatments.

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and gastroenterology practice does not view chiropractic treatment as an established or evidence-based therapy for irritable bowel syndrome. ^{[7][29][30][31][32]} Current guideline-driven management of chronic conditions in internal medicine emphasizes using interventions supported by high-quality randomized trials, meta-analyses, and rigorous grading of evidence quality; chiropractic for IBS does not meet these standards. ^[1] For IBS, major guidelines instead recommend a stepwise, multifactorial approach focused on positive diagnosis, patient education, dietary strategies (such as low FODMAP diet), targeted pharmacologic therapies according to IBS subtype (constipation, diarrhea, or mixed), psychological and behavioral interventions (e. ^[3] g. , CBT, gut-directed hypnotherapy), and selected adjunctive therapies with supportive evidence (such as specific probiotics), while not including chiropractic manipulation as a recommended modality. Osteopathic or other manual therapies may be considered experimental adjuncts with low-certainty evidence, and are not part of core first-line management. Thus, the mainstream position is that chiropractic care should not replace established IBS treatments and, at most, might be considered an unproven complementary therapy where patients are carefully counseled about the limited and low-quality evidence and the need to continue guideline-based care. ^[5][6]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on IBS, SIBO and gut disorders

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia

Supports

There are some small randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials suggesting that chiropractic or spinal manipulation as part of a multimodal program may improve pain, function, or range of motion in fibromyalgia, but these are preliminary and often methodologically weak. ^[3][35] Narrative and umbrella reviews identify several RCTs (e. g. , spinal manipulation added to exercise or multimodal programs, upper cervical manipulation trials) that report improvements in fibromyalgia outcomes over time, which provides limited, low-quality support for the possibility of benefit. ^[5][6][33] A randomized trial combining resistance training with chiropractic care found that adding chiropractic improved exercise adherence and dropout rates and was associated with greater improvements in certain functionality domains, suggesting chiropractic might have an adjunctive role rather than being a primary fibromyalgia treatment. ^[34][36]

Contradicts

Multiple systematic reviews and evidence overviews conclude that the evidence for chiropractic or spinal manipulation in fibromyalgia is weak, inconsistent, and methodologically poor, and that there is no reliable proof it is effective as a stand‑alone treatment. ^{[5][33][35][36]} A systematic review of chiropractic treatment for fibromyalgia identified only three small, poor‑quality studies and found no evidence that chiropractic care is effective for fibromyalgia pain or global symptoms. ^[34] An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine for fibromyalgia reports that no firm conclusions can be drawn for spinal manipulation and that existing chiropractic trials do not demonstrate clear pain benefit. Large evidence reports on manual therapies and spinal manipulation characterize the evidence for fibromyalgia as inconclusive and in an unclear direction, with low quantity and poor quality of primary data. ^[6] A more recent systematic review of manual therapy in fibromyalgia similarly judges the overall quality of evidence as very low to moderate and concludes it is insufficient to support or recommend manual therapy for this condition. ^[7] Sham‑controlled osteopathic manipulation trials in fibromyalgia, which are conceptually similar manual therapies, show no clinically meaningful benefit over sham in pain, fatigue, function, or quality of life, reinforcing concerns that any apparent benefit of hands‑on manipulative approaches may largely reflect expectancy, placebo, or nonspecific effects rather than specific efficacy. Overall, high‑quality evidence contradicts any strong claim that chiropractic treatment is an effective primary therapy for fibromyalgia.

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and scientific opinion is that fibromyalgia is best managed with a multimodal approach centered on patient education, aerobic and strengthening exercise programs, cognitive‑behavioral or other psychological therapies, and judicious use of medications with evidence for benefit (e. g. , certain antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or other agents), usually following rheumatology and pain society guidelines. ^[3] Chiropractor‑delivered spinal manipulation or other manual therapies are not considered first‑line or core evidence‑based treatments for fibromyalgia, and are generally viewed—at most—as optional complementary interventions that might help some individuals but lack robust, high‑quality evidence of specific efficacy. ^[1][33] Current systematic reviews and evidence syntheses assess the quality of evidence for chiropractic in fibromyalgia as low and inconclusive, and major guidelines do not endorse chiropractic manipulation as a standard treatment for this condition. ^{[5][6][34][35][36]}

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Fibromyalgia”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure THYROID & HYPOTHYROIDISM.

THYROID & HYPOTHYROIDISM

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“THYROID & HYPOTHYROIDISM”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Thyroid disease and Hashimoto

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure MENOPAUSE.

MENOPAUSE

Supports

High-quality evidence supports menopausal symptom treatment with menopausal hormone therapy and some nonhormonal options, not chiropractic care. ^[7] The menopause guideline review found that the highest-quality clinical practice guidelines consistently recommend menopausal hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms and menopause-associated mood disturbance, and not for cardiometabolic disease or dementia prevention . ^{[3][2][5][6][21][23]} The North American Menopause Society position statement says there have been no clinical trials of chiropractic interventions for vasomotor symptoms and that chiropractic interventions are not recommended for treatment of vasomotor symptoms . ^[24] A review of menopause therapies also states that there are no supporting quality data for chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation in the treatment of menopause . ^[22]

Contradicts

The claim that chiropractors treat menopause or hormone imbalances is not supported by the indexed evidence. ^[6] The menopause review found no clinical trial evidence for chiropractic interventions for vasomotor symptoms and no association in epidemiologic data . ^{[3][21][22][23]} The earlier review of chiropractic intervention for postmenopausal climacteric symptoms and insomnia reported no evidence for effectiveness of chiropractic intervention as a complementary or alternative therapy for menopausal symptoms and insomnia . ^[7][24] Evidence that sometimes appears relevant is indirect and low quality, such as a small randomized trial in premenstrual syndrome, which is a different condition than menopause . Some recent reviews of manual therapy or nonstandard interventions address musculoskeletal pain or alternative modalities, but they do not establish chiropractic treatment as a therapy for menopausal hormone imbalance or core menopausal symptoms .

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical view is that chiropractic care is not an evidence-based treatment for menopause or hormone imbalance. ^{[1][5][6][24]} Standard management of menopausal symptoms centers on menopausal hormone therapy when appropriate, and on selected nonhormonal therapies for vasomotor symptoms and related complaints; chiropractic may be used only, if at all, for separate musculoskeletal issues, not for correcting hormones or treating menopause itself . ^{[4][7][21][22][23]}

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“MENOPAUSE”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Menopause

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure AUTOIMMUNITY.

AUTOIMMUNITY

Supports

There is currently no high-quality evidence (systematic reviews, large RCTs, major guidelines) showing that chiropractic treatment has clinically meaningful benefits on autoimmune diseases themselves (e.g., reducing disease activity, preventing flares, inducing remission, or altering long‑term outcomes). Systematic reviews of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and immune-related outcomes report at most short‑term changes in immune or stress biomarkers without demonstrated clinical benefit on immune-mediated or infectious diseases, and they explicitly conclude that clinical evidence to support or refute claims of disease prevention or treatment via immune modulation is lacking. Recent randomized trials show that chiropractic adjustments can change certain circulating biomarkers (e.g., IL‑6, TNF‑α, BDNF, cortisol), but these studies involve small samples, focus on nonspecific musculoskeletal or stress-related contexts, and do not study autoimmune diagnoses or hard clinical endpoints. Major autoimmune disease management evidence (e.g., vitamin D and omega‑3 RCTs for autoimmune disease prevention^[16], immunomodulatory biologics^[19], mesenchymal stem cell transplantation^[18], and guideline‑based therapies for inflammatory bowel disease nutrition^[2]) highlights pharmacologic and nutritional strategies and does not include chiropractic as a disease-modifying treatment.

Contradicts

The best available evidence explicitly contradicts strong claims that chiropractic treatment can effectively treat autoimmunity or meaningfully boost immune function in a clinically relevant way. A systematic review in JAMA Network Open found no acceptable- or high-quality randomized trials showing that spinal manipulative therapy changes immune system outcomes in a way that prevents or treats infectious disease, and concluded there is no clinical evidence to support or refute such immune claims. Consensus statements from chiropractic researchers similarly state there is no valid clinical scientific evidence that chiropractic care impacts the immune system to prevent common illnesses. Narrative reviews and research bulletins from chiropractic organizations summarize that existing laboratory and small experimental studies on immune markers after spinal manipulation are contradictory, underpowered, and do not justify clinical claims of enhanced immunity. Importantly, none of the major autoimmune-related RCTs and guidelines—such as the VITAL trial showing modest autoimmune disease prevention with vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acids^[16], the mesenchymal stem cell meta‑analysis for several autoimmune diseases^[18], or guidelines on clinical nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease emphasizing diet, enteral/parenteral nutrition, and immunosuppressive therapy^[2]—include chiropractic or spinal manipulation as a recommended treatment or modifier of autoimmune disease course. This absence in disease‑specific guidelines and high‑quality trials is a strong signal that evidence supporting chiropractic as a treatment for autoimmunity is weak to nonexistent.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that autoimmune diseases are managed with evidence‑based pharmacologic therapies (e.g., immunosuppressants, biologics, targeted small molecules), lifestyle modification, and adjunctive supportive measures such as appropriate nutrition, vaccination, and management of comorbidities, guided by specialty society and organ‑specific guidelines^[2][18][19]. Chiropractic care is not recognized as a disease‑modifying treatment for autoimmunity and is absent from major guidelines on autoimmune conditions, which instead focus on immune‑targeting drugs, nutritional support, and cardiovascular risk reduction in autoimmune and inflammatory populations^{[2][18][19][22]}. Chiropractic or spinal manipulation may have a role as supportive care for mechanical pain or musculoskeletal complaints in some patients, but using chiropractic treatment with the expectation of directly treating autoimmunity, altering immune dysregulation, or preventing autoimmune disease is not supported by current high‑quality evidence and is considered outside mainstream, guideline‑based care.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“AUTOIMMUNITY”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Autoimmune disease

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Environmental & Heavy Metal Toxicity as within their scope of practice.

Environmental & Heavy Metal Toxicity

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Environmental & Heavy Metal Toxicity”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(d)

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise His expertise lies in addressing these health challenges through advanced nutrition and a holistic approach to health care. as within their scope of practice.

His expertise lies in addressing these health challenges through advanced nutrition and a holistic approach to health care.

Supports

High-quality evidence supports the use of nutrition as an important component of care in several major health conditions, and many guidelines explicitly recommend a holistic, multidisciplinary approach that includes nutrition. ESPEN and other oncology expert groups recommend systematic nutritional screening and individualized nutrition plans as a core part of multidisciplinary cancer care, including counseling, oral supplements, and escalation to enteral/parenteral nutrition when indicated.^{[11][16][21][17]} These guidelines emphasize combining nutrition with exercise and psychosocial, patient‑centered care, which is consistent with a holistic care model.^[17][21] In dementia and cognitive disorders, randomized trials and systematic reviews show that multi‑nutrient formulations, antioxidant‑rich foods, and fatty acid supplementation can improve cognitive‑related biomarkers and some specific cognitive domains, even though global cognition effects are limited.^{[13][18][24][22]} A Cochrane review on cognitive training in mild‑to‑moderate dementia shows benefit from non‑pharmacologic, multidomain interventions, which align with holistic strategies that integrate cognitive, psychosocial, and lifestyle components rather than single-target treatments. Major oncology and palliative care commissions and guidelines explicitly advocate integration of oncology and palliative care, emphasizing symptom control, psychosocial support, and coordinated multidisciplinary teams as part of comprehensive “whole-person” care. Clinical nutrition research increasingly promotes frameworks that treat malnutrition in older adults and advanced liver disease using individualized, multifactorial interventions that consider physical, psychological, social, and environmental determinants, again supporting the principle that nutrition within a holistic care framework can meaningfully address complex health challenges.^[5][10]

Contradicts

Although nutrition and holistic, multidisciplinary care are supported as important components of managing serious health conditions, the evidence does not support broad claims that such approaches, on their own, reliably “address” or resolve major health challenges in the sense of reversing diseases like dementia or advanced cancer. Systematic reviews of nutritional interventions in mild cognitive impairment and dementia consistently report that few nutritional strategies convincingly improve global cognition, and overall evidence for maintaining or improving cognitive function via nutrition alone is limited.^[19][13][18] The large randomized MIND diet trial in older adults at risk for Alzheimer’s disease found no significant difference in cognitive or MRI outcomes between the MIND diet and a control healthy diet with mild caloric restriction over three years, suggesting that even sophisticated dietary patterns may not substantially alter cognitive trajectories by themselves.^[25][15] In cancer, guidelines and expert recommendations place nutrition as supportive and preventive—important for quality of life, treatment tolerance, and risk factor modification—but do not claim that “advanced nutrition” is sufficient to treat or cure cancer; nutrition is one element embedded in broader oncology and palliative care.^{[11][16][17][20][21][23]} Similarly, the Lancet Oncology commission on integrating oncology and palliative care emphasizes coordinated, multidisciplinary care across physical, psychosocial, and spiritual domains, but frames this as improving symptom control and quality of life rather than as a stand‑alone solution to complex oncologic health challenges. Overall, the evidence base supports nutrition and holistic care as valuable adjuncts, while contradicting the notion that expertise in these domains alone can comprehensively address or resolve complex chronic or life‑limiting diseases.

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and scientific practice views nutrition and holistic, multidisciplinary care as important components of prevention and management across many conditions, but as adjunctive rather than curative strategies. In oncology, leading guidelines (ESPEN, SEOM and related expert groups) and integrative oncology frameworks recommend routine nutritional risk screening, individualized nutrition plans, and combining nutrition with exercise, psychosocial support, and symptom management within multidisciplinary teams.^{[11][16][17][21][23][20]} In dementia and cognitive disorders, high‑quality reviews and RCTs show that some nutritional interventions and multidomain programs can modestly influence biomarkers and specific cognitive functions, but they are generally regarded as supportive, with limited impact on overall disease progression.^{[13][18][19][24][22]} Major commissions on integrating oncology with palliative care and on expanding the role of primary care in cancer control endorse a holistic, “whole‑person” approach that includes physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions, coordinated across specialties and care settings. Thus, the mainstream position is that expertise in nutrition and holistic care is valuable and evidence‑aligned when used within guideline‑based, multidisciplinary frameworks, but it does not replace disease‑specific medical therapies and is not by itself sufficient to address complex health challenges.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“His expertise lies in addressing these health challenges through advanced nutrition and a holistic approach to health care.”

Rule: N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(d)(4)

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise health coaching as within their scope of practice.

health coaching

Supports

No high-quality evidence in the provided index papers supports the specific claim that chiropractors provide health coaching as an evidence-based medical treatment. ^[1][5][6] The list includes guidelines on hypertension, nutrition, headache, transfusion, and pericarditis, but none evaluate chiropractic health coaching as a clinical intervention . ^{[3][2][4][7][8]}

Contradicts

The claim is too vague to be directly tested, but the provided evidence base does not establish chiropractic treatment or health coaching as a guideline-supported therapy for the medical conditions covered by these papers . ^[1][5][6] In contrast, the indexed guidelines emphasize condition-specific management approaches such as antihypertensive therapy, nutrition support, headache management, transfusion practice, and colchicine for pericarditis rather than chiropractic care . ^[3][4][7][8] The GRADE paper is a methods paper and does not support the clinical claim itself .

Mainstream view

Mainstream medicine does not consider chiropractic health coaching to be a standard, evidence-based treatment for the conditions represented in the provided guidelines. ^[1][5][6] Health coaching may be used as a general behavioral support strategy in some care models, but that is distinct from chiropractic treatment and is not established by the cited clinical guidelines . ^[3]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“health coaching”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5 (Chiropractic)

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Advanced Functional Medicine Services.

Advanced Functional Medicine Services

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Advanced Functional Medicine Services”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)

Jason Kaufman is not licensed or approved by New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Functional Medicine & Wellness Services.

Functional Medicine & Wellness Services

No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“Functional Medicine & Wellness Services”

Rule: N.J.S.A. 45:9-14.5(a), (c); N.J.A.C. 13:44E-1.1(a)