Eric Nepute

Complaint template prepared from a public-record review by drtrustmebro.com. The complaint you submit is your own; review and edit every statement before signing. This template is intended for residents or patients of Missouri. It is not legal advice.

In the Matter of:
Eric Nepute
License No. [LICENSE NUMBER, IF KNOWN]
NPI (public registry): 1790833044

I. INTRODUCTION

Complainant respectfully submits this complaint to the MISSOURI STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS requesting formal investigation and regulatory review concerning Eric Nepute (the Respondent), identified in the attached public materials.

The public materials reviewed appear to present representations concerning the identification and management of health conditions, including Functional Neurology, Internal Health, Peptide therapies, Root-cause solutions, Natural medicine, and Functional Neurology for neurological disease, that may extend beyond the D.C. scope in Missouri.

This complaint is based exclusively upon publicly available materials and does not rely upon confidential patient records, privileged communications, or non-public investigative information. The factual observations herein were assembled from an automated public-record review of the Respondent's public website and public registry records, and were reviewed and adopted by the Complainant. All observations are potential, unverified signals from public records; the Board is the sole finder of fact.

The principal public materials reviewed include https://ericnepute.com/, https://ericnepute.com/shop/supplementation/browse-nepute-wellness-products/ and the public registry and license verification sources listed in the exhibit index below.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Licensure

Public content appears to address Functional Neurology, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Peptide therapies, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Natural medicine, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Functional Neurology for neurological disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions for chronic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri.

B. Marketing

Publicly posted content appears to make the following representation. QUOTE: "Doctor of Functional Neurology". Publicly posted content appears to make the following representation. QUOTE: "Fellowship in Internal Health". Publicly posted content appears to make the following representation. QUOTE: "discussions on health, genetics, psychology, peptide therapies, sports medicine". Publicly posted content appears to make the following representation. QUOTE: "dedicated to helping individuals take control of their health through personalized care, root-cause solutions".

C. Clinical Frameworks

Public content appears to address Functional Neurology, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Peptide therapies, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Natural medicine, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Functional Neurology for neurological disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions for chronic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri.

D. Funnel

Public content appears to address Functional Neurology, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Peptide therapies, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Natural medicine, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Functional Neurology for neurological disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions for chronic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri.

E. Storefront

Public content appears to address Functional Neurology, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Peptide therapies, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Natural medicine, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Functional Neurology for neurological disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions for chronic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri.

F. Testimonials

Public content appears to address Functional Neurology, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Peptide therapies, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Natural medicine, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Functional Neurology for neurological disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Internal Health for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri. Public content appears to address Root-cause solutions for chronic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope in Missouri.

G. Complainant's Own Experience

[DESCRIBE YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE, IF ANY]

III. AREAS OF CONCERN

COUNT I: PRACTICE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF CHIROPRACTIC

Cited authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.010 and Section 331.060.2(18).

The public materials described in the Statement of Facts above appear to address Functional Neurology, Internal Health, Peptide therapies, Root-cause solutions, Natural medicine, Functional Neurology for neurological disease, Internal Health for systemic disease, and Root-cause solutions for chronic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the D.C. scope.

The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.010 and Section 331.060.2(18) and warrants Board investigation.

COUNT II: DECEPTIVE OR MISLEADING PUBLIC REPRESENTATIONS

Cited authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(4) and Section 331.060.2(18).

The public representations described above appear capable of conveying to consumers a level of clinical authority beyond the licensed scope.

The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(4) and Section 331.060.2(18) and warrants Board investigation.

COUNT III: IMPROPER TREATMENT PLANNING AND CLINICAL CONDUCT

Cited authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(5).

The public materials described above appear to present condition-specific frameworks, laboratory-testing guidance, and treatment protocols directed at systemic conditions, rather than services grounded in the licensed scope.

The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(5) and warrants Board investigation.

COUNT IV: FINANCIALLY EXPLOITATIVE MONETIZATION

Cited authority: Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(4).

The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(4) and warrants Board investigation.

COUNT V: UNLAWFUL OR MISLEADING ADVERTISING

Cited authority: 20 CSR 2070-2.060(6) and Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(18).

The public marketing representations and testimonials described above appear to present the practice's services without consistently identifying the limits of the D.C. scope or the practitioner's credentials.

The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under 20 CSR 2070-2.060(6) and Mo. Rev. Stat. Section 331.060.2(18) and warrants Board investigation.

IV. RELIEF REQUESTED

A. Formal investigation of the conduct described herein, including review of the Respondent's public advertising, website representations, consultation materials, and commercial structures.

B. A determination by the Board of whether the conduct described herein is consistent with the statutes and rules cited above.

C. Such disciplinary action as the Board deems appropriate based on its own investigation and findings, up to the maximum authorized for any violation the Board finds.

D. Corrective relief, where the Board deems appropriate, including requiring the Respondent to correct or remove the specific public representations described above and, if the conduct continues, seeking injunctive relief through a court of competent jurisdiction.

E. To the extent within the Board's authority, review of the revenues derived from the consultations, care plans, and product sales described above, and consideration of restitution for consumers who relied on the representations to their financial or physical detriment.

F. Such other and further relief as the Board deems just and proper to protect the public.

Respectfully submitted,

[YOUR NAME]

[YOUR MAILING ADDRESS]

[YOUR EMAIL AND PHONE]

[DATE]

EDIT BEFORE SENDING

1. Confirm the license number using the license lookup in Exhibit A and fill it in on page 1.
2. Replace every bracketed placeholder with your own information, or delete sections that do not apply.
3. Print and attach dated captures of each exhibit page listed in the exhibit index.
4. Review every factual statement yourself before signing; submit only what you can stand behind.
5. Check the board's current submission rules (online portal, mail, or fax) before sending.

EXHIBIT INDEX