Taylor James Premer
BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health Licensure Unit
Hedged asks the board to investigate. Assertive states the concern as a would-be violation. The same facts and exhibits are used either way.
Download document (hedged)Complaint template prepared from a public-record review by drtrustmebro.com. The complaint you submit is your own; review and edit every statement before signing. This template is intended for residents or patients of Nebraska. It is not legal advice.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH
OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS
In the Matter of:
Taylor James Premer
License No. [LICENSE NUMBER, IF KNOWN]
100, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
NPI (public registry): 1588146310
I. INTRODUCTION
Complainant respectfully submits this complaint to the BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health Licensure Unit requesting formal investigation and regulatory review concerning Taylor James Premer (the Respondent), identified in the attached public materials.
The public materials reviewed appear to present representations concerning the identification and management of health conditions, including Functional Medicine, Functional lab testing (GI MAP, DUTCH, blood work), Nutrition & supplement protocols, root-cause approach, Root-Cause Care, and Diagnosing systemic internal disease (hormone, gut, inflammation) via functional labs, that may extend beyond the DC scope in Nebraska.
This complaint is based exclusively upon publicly available materials and does not rely upon confidential patient records, privileged communications, or non-public investigative information. The factual observations herein were assembled from an automated public-record review of the Respondent's public website and public registry records, and were reviewed and adopted by the Complainant. All observations are potential, unverified signals from public records; the Board is the sole finder of fact.
The principal public materials reviewed include https://premerhealth.com/ and the public registry and license verification sources listed in the exhibit index below.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Scope of Practice Concerns
Public content appears to address Functional Medicine, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Functional lab testing (GI MAP, DUTCH, blood work), which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Nutrition & supplement protocols, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address root-cause approach, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Root-Cause Care, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Diagnosing systemic internal disease (hormone, gut, inflammation) via functional labs, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Treating 'root causes' of fatigue, gut issues, and behavioral changes, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Prescribing 'practitioner-grade' supplements as medical treatment for dysfunction, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Offering 'Functional Medicine' as a service for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Functional Medicine for systemic disease, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address GI MAP and DUTCH lab panels for hormone/gut dysfunction, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska. Public content appears to address Root-cause protocols for fatigue and gut issues, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope in Nebraska.
III. AREAS OF CONCERN
COUNT I: PRACTICE BEYOND AUTHORIZED SCOPE
Cited authority: Neb. Rev. Stat. Section 38-805 and Section 38-178(24).
The public materials described in the Statement of Facts above appear to address Functional Medicine, Functional lab testing (GI MAP, DUTCH, blood work), Nutrition & supplement protocols, root-cause approach, Root-Cause Care, Diagnosing systemic internal disease (hormone, gut, inflammation) via functional labs, Treating 'root causes' of fatigue, gut issues, and behavioral changes, Prescribing 'practitioner-grade' supplements as medical treatment for dysfunction, Offering 'Functional Medicine' as a service for systemic disease, Functional Medicine for systemic disease, GI MAP and DUTCH lab panels for hormone/gut dysfunction, and Root-cause protocols for fatigue and gut issues, which the cited rule text suggests may fall outside the DC scope.
The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Neb. Rev. Stat. Section 38-805 and Section 38-178(24) and warrants Board investigation.
COUNT II: UNLAWFUL INVASION OF THE FIELD OF MEDICINE
Cited authority: Neb. Rev. Stat. Sections 38-101 et seq..
The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Neb. Rev. Stat. Sections 38-101 et seq. and warrants Board investigation.
COUNT III: UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Cited authority: Neb. Rev. Stat. Section 38-178(6), (9), and (17).
The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Neb. Rev. Stat. Section 38-178(6), (9), and (17) and warrants Board investigation.
COUNT IV: MISREPRESENTATION OF CREDENTIALS
Cited authority: Neb. Rev. Stat. Section 38-178(2).
The conduct described above raises substantial concerns under Neb. Rev. Stat. Section 38-178(2) and warrants Board investigation.
IV. RELIEF REQUESTED
A. Formal investigation of the conduct described herein, including review of the Respondent's public advertising, website representations, consultation materials, and commercial structures.
B. A determination by the Board of whether the conduct described herein is consistent with the statutes and rules cited above.
C. Such disciplinary action as the Board deems appropriate based on its own investigation and findings, up to the maximum authorized for any violation the Board finds.
D. Corrective relief, where the Board deems appropriate, including requiring the Respondent to correct or remove the specific public representations described above and, if the conduct continues, seeking injunctive relief through a court of competent jurisdiction.
E. To the extent within the Board's authority, review of the revenues derived from the consultations, care plans, and product sales described above, and consideration of restitution for consumers who relied on the representations to their financial or physical detriment.
F. Such other and further relief as the Board deems just and proper to protect the public.
Respectfully submitted,
[YOUR NAME]
[YOUR MAILING ADDRESS]
[YOUR EMAIL AND PHONE]
[DATE]
EDIT BEFORE SENDING
- Confirm the license number using the license lookup in Exhibit A and fill it in on page 1.
- Replace every bracketed placeholder with your own information, or delete sections that do not apply.
- Print and attach dated captures of each exhibit page listed in the exhibit index.
- Review every factual statement yourself before signing; submit only what you can stand behind.
- Check the board's current submission rules (online portal, mail, or fax) before sending.
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit | Description | Source | Archived capture |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exhibit A | State license verification printout | https://www.nebraska.gov/LISSearch/search.cgi | [attach a printed, dated capture] |
| Exhibit B | Practice homepage | https://premerhealth.com/ | https://web.archive.org/web/20260706193656/https://www.premerhealth.com/ (captured 2026070619) |
These templates are prepared from public records and are not legal advice. Every observation is a potential, unverified signal; the board is the sole finder of fact. Review and edit each statement before signing and submitting.