Jonah Dallas Yakel alias Keyword CIRS Prophet

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure depression.

depression

Supports

Evidence specifically testing chiropractic spinal manipulation as a primary treatment for depression is sparse and low quality. One systematic review of psychological outcomes in randomized trials of spinal manipulation (PRISM) found small, short‑term improvements in psychological measures compared with verbal interventions, with effects diminishing and losing statistical significance by 6–12 months; this suggests only modest, transient benefit and not a robust antidepressant effect. ^[11] Separate systematic reviews and meta‑analyses of manual therapies (osteopathic interventions, massage, acupressure, craniosacral, energetic therapies) report reductions in depression scores in adults, particularly in populations with pain, but these are not chiropractic‑specific and often involve different modalities; they support the idea that hands‑on physical treatments can indirectly improve mood via pain, tension, and sleep rather than directly treating major depressive disorder. ^[4][10][12] A recent systematic review of manual therapy modalities and depression reported that 5 of 6 chiropractic manipulation studies showed statistically significant reductions in depressive symptoms, but the overall evidence quality was rated low to moderate, studies were small and heterogeneous, and manual therapy was framed as a complementary rather than primary treatment for depression. ^[6][7][9] Case reports and small uncontrolled series describe individual patients with chronic pain and comorbid depression experiencing improvement in depressive symptoms after courses of chiropractic care, but such uncontrolled observations are considered very weak evidence and mainly hypothesis‑generating. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is supported by substantial controlled trials and clinical experience as an effective treatment for depression and is endorsed in psychiatric practice, illustrating that the mainstream evidence base for depression focuses on psychotherapies and pharmacologic treatments rather than chiropractic. ^[2][8]

Contradicts

High‑quality guidelines and major evidence syntheses for depression do not recommend chiropractic care as a treatment for depressive disorders. ^[6] The psychodynamic treatment of depression review describes talk‑therapy approaches (psychodynamic psychotherapy and other evidence‑based psychotherapies) and positions them as central modalities for managing depressive illness, without mentioning chiropractic or spinal manipulation as a therapeutic option. ^{[1][7][8][9][10][11]} More broadly, major clinical guidelines for mental health and primary care, as reflected in the psychiatric and internal medicine literature, emphasize antidepressant medications, evidence‑based psychotherapies (such as CBT, interpersonal therapy, psychodynamic therapy), and structured lifestyle interventions; chiropractic is not included among first‑line or even standard adjunctive treatments for depression. ^[2] Even within musculoskeletal care, evidence‑based guidelines and task‑force reports indicate that psychological factors and mental health conditions are reasons for referral from chiropractors to mental health professionals, not conditions for which chiropractors themselves provide primary treatment, reinforcing that treatment of depression lies outside usual chiropractic scope of practice. ^[4] Existing manual‑therapy meta‑analyses and systematic reviews highlight serious limitations: small sample sizes, heterogeneous interventions and patient groups, inadequate blinding and control conditions, reliance on subjective outcomes, short follow‑up, and high or unclear risk of bias; authors consistently call for larger, higher‑quality randomized trials before any firm claims about treating major depressive disorder can be made. ^[12] Where RCTs include depression outcomes in back‑pain or chronic‑pain populations, depression scores often improve similarly across various physical‑therapy or manual‑therapy arms, suggesting that improvements reflect better pain, function, sleep, and overall quality of life rather than a specific antidepressant effect of chiropractic manipulation. Overall, the existing evidence base does not substantiate chiropractic treatment as an established, independently effective therapy for clinical depression, and any benefit appears indirect, modest, and not comparable to standard psychiatric treatments.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that depression is best treated with evidence‑based psychotherapies, pharmacologic antidepressants, and, where appropriate, other validated interventions (for example, digital CBT, mindfulness‑based programs, and sleep‑focused treatments), guided by psychiatric and primary‑care guidelines. ^{[1][2][5][6][8][10][12]} Psychodynamic psychotherapy is recognized as one of several established psychotherapeutic approaches with demonstrated efficacy for depressive disorders, alongside cognitive‑behavioral and interpersonal therapies. For somatic and neuromodulation approaches (such as electroconvulsive therapy or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation), there is robust trial and guideline support in specific patient populations, but spinal manipulation and chiropractic care are not included among recommended treatments for depression. ^[7][11] Manual therapies, including chiropractic, may play a role in managing musculoskeletal pain, tension, and sleep disturbance, all of which can contribute to or exacerbate depressive symptoms, so they may be used as adjuncts in holistic care for patients whose primary complaints are pain, with mood improvements considered secondary and indirect. Major guidelines and professional statements emphasize that treating mental health conditions, including major depressive disorder, is outside the primary scope of chiropractic practice; chiropractors are expected to screen for mental health problems and refer ^[9]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth #functionalmedicine #depression #amxiety #bipolar #ocd #schizophrenic #rootcause #inflammation #mold #CIRS”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Depression

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure bipolar.

bipolar

Supports

There is no high-quality evidence in the provided index papers supporting chiropractic treatment for bipolar disorder. ^[4][6] The bipolar disorder guideline reviewed for complementary and integrative health found no included publications meeting criteria for chiropractic care in adults with bipolar disorder . ^[14] More broadly, the current evidence base for bipolar disorder treatment emphasizes established psychiatric interventions rather than chiropractic care .

Contradicts

The claim is contradicted by the absence of eligible trial or systematic-review evidence for chiropractic care in bipolar disorder in the reviewed guideline evidence base . ^[4][6] The literature retrieved here on chiropractic/spinal manipulation is about pain or psychological outcomes in non-bipolar populations, which does not establish efficacy for bipolar disorder . ^[14][16][17] Existing bipolar-disorder guidance focuses on evidence-based psychiatric management and does not list chiropractic care as a treatment . ^[1]

Mainstream view

Chiropractic treatment is not a recognized evidence-based treatment for bipolar disorder. ^[1] Mainstream psychiatric care relies on mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, psychotherapy, and structured follow-up, while complementary approaches such as chiropractic care lack supporting clinical trial evidence for bipolar disorder . ^[2][14]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth #functionalmedicine #depression #amxiety #bipolar #ocd #schizophrenic #rootcause #inflammation #mold #CIRS”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure ocd.

ocd

Supports

High-quality evidence for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment consistently identifies cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention (CBT/ERP) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or clomipramine as effective first-line treatments, not chiropractic or spinal manipulation.^{[12][13][16][18][20][21][22]} Current clinical practice guidelines from major bodies (e.g., NICE, APA and other international guidelines) all recommend CBT/ERP and SSRIs as first-line or core treatments for OCD.^{[9][10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]} For moderate to severe or treatment-resistant OCD, guidelines and high-level reviews support stepped or combined strategies such as combined SSRI + CBT, augmentation with other psychotropics, and in extreme refractory cases neuromodulation (e.g., deep brain stimulation), again with no role for chiropractic care.^{[4][5][6][7][10][11][12][13][16][18][20][21]} I am not aware of any randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or major guidelines that endorse chiropractic or spinal manipulation as an evidence-based treatment for OCD; reports in the chiropractic literature are limited to uncontrolled case reports or case series, which are very low-quality evidence and cannot establish efficacy.

Contradicts

Major OCD treatment guidelines and systematic reviews emphasize that effective management is based on CBT/ERP and serotonergic medications (SSRIs, clomipramine), and they do not list chiropractic manipulation or spinal adjustment among recommended treatments.^{[9][10][11][12][13][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]} These guidelines are developed using frameworks such as GRADE to rate quality of evidence and do not identify any moderate- or high-quality evidence supporting chiropractic for OCD.^{[6][12][13][16][18]} The absence of chiropractic from multiple independent, up-to-date national and international OCD guidelines, despite detailed discussion of many pharmacologic, psychologic, and even neurosurgical options, strongly implies that evidence for chiropractic in OCD is either non-existent or considered too weak/low quality to recommend.^{[10][11][12][13][16][18][20][21]} Available chiropractic reports about OCD are case studies without control groups, small samples, and high risk of bias, which cannot establish causal benefit and frequently involve concurrent conventional or developmental changes, making attribution impossible; this stands in contrast to the multiple RCTs and meta-analyses supporting CBT/ERP and SSRIs.^{[4][6][7][16][18][20][21]} Therefore, the claim that chiropractic treatment is an effective or evidence-based therapy for OCD is not supported by high-quality evidence and conflicts with established guideline-based care pathways.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and psychiatric position is that obsessive-compulsive disorder is best treated with evidence-based psychological therapy, especially cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention, and pharmacotherapy with SSRIs or clomipramine as first-line options.^{[9][10][11][12][13][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]} For patients who do not respond adequately, recommended next steps include optimizing CBT/ERP and SSRI dose/duration, switching or augmenting medications, and in severe refractory cases considering advanced neuromodulation approaches in specialist centers.^{[4][5][6][7][12][13][16][18][20][21]} Chiropractic or spinal manipulation is not part of any major OCD treatment guideline, is not supported by randomized trials or systematic reviews for OCD, and is considered outside standard, evidence-based care for this disorder; at most, it might be viewed as an unproven complementary practice that should not replace guideline-recommended psychiatric and psychological treatment.^{[10][11][12][13][16][18][20][21]}

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth #functionalmedicine #depression #amxiety #bipolar #ocd #schizophrenic #rootcause #inflammation #mold #CIRS”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Other mental health conditions

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure CIRS.

CIRS

Supports

The provided peer-reviewed index list does not include any guideline, systematic review, meta-analysis, or randomized trial supporting chiropractic treatment for chronic inflammatory response syndrome (CIRS). ^{[3][4][22][23][24]} The closest chiropractic evidence in the index is a guideline for musculoskeletal pain management, which does not address CIRS . ^[1][6][25] The strongest CIRS-specific literature located in academic search is not chiropractic-focused; it instead discusses the Shoemaker protocol and related non-chiropractic interventions as the claimed treatment approach .

Contradicts

There is no high-quality evidence in the supplied index papers showing that chiropractic care treats CIRS, and the indexed guideline papers are unrelated to CIRS entirely . ^{[1][4][6][22][24]} The academic-search evidence available is largely from CIRS-authored reviews and protocol papers rather than independent systematic reviews or RCTs, so it does not establish chiropractic efficacy for CIRS. ^[23][25] Chiropractic reviews in the broader literature address other conditions, not CIRS, and do not justify extrapolation to this syndrome .

Mainstream view

Mainstream medicine does not recognize chiropractic as an evidence-based treatment for CIRS. ^[22] CIRS itself remains a controversial diagnosis with a limited, non-mainstream evidence base, and chiropractic manipulation is not a standard or guideline-supported therapy for it. ^[7][23][25] If a patient has symptoms attributed to mold or environmental exposure, mainstream evaluation generally focuses on established differential diagnoses and evidence-based management of specific conditions rather than chiropractic treatment. ^[1][24]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth #functionalmedicine #depression #amxiety #bipolar #ocd #schizophrenic #rootcause #inflammation #mold #CIRS”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Mold illness and CIRS

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure dementia.

dementia

Supports

High-quality evidence specifically showing that chiropractic treatment improves dementia symptoms or slows dementia progression is essentially absent. ^[6] Recent pilot studies and exploratory work have examined the neurophysiological effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation in people with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), reporting changes in EEG parameters and default mode network connectivity after single or short-term interventions, but these are very small trials focused on surrogate outcomes, not on clinically meaningful cognitive or functional endpoints. ^[26][27] Narrative reviews aimed at manual therapy providers emphasize lifestyle interventions (physical activity, mental stimulation, risk factor control) rather than spinal manipulation as the core of dementia-related care, indicating that chiropractors’ main evidence-based role is supportive and lifestyle-focused, not disease-modifying treatment. ^{[1][4][7][28][29]} Across dementia care research more broadly, randomized trials and guidelines emphasize multidisciplinary medical management, risk-factor control, cognitive training, and caregiver support rather than chiropractic as a primary treatment modality. ^[2]

Contradicts

Major dementia practice recommendations and guidelines do not list chiropractic spinal manipulation or chiropractic treatment as an evidence-based therapy for dementia or mild cognitive impairment, either for symptom control or disease modification. ^{[1][2][7][28][29]} They instead emphasize pharmacologic options when appropriate, management of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, structured physical and cognitive activity, hearing correction, psychosocial interventions, and caregiver and nursing-led care pathways. ^[5] Large randomized trials of dementia prevention and management focus on multimodal lifestyle interventions, hearing interventions, cognitive training, and nursing or caregiver-led programs, with no role identified for chiropractic care as a disease-modifying treatment. The available chiropractic studies in dementia or MCI are pilot or exploratory, with very small sample sizes, short follow-up, and outcomes limited to EEG changes rather than validated cognitive scales or quality-of-life measures; this represents low and imprecise evidence by GRADE criteria and is insufficient to support claims of effective dementia treatment. ^{[4][6][26][27]} A small clinical study on chiropractic adjustments and cognitive function reported no significant improvements in cognition, further weakening the case that chiropractic manipulation meaningfully treats dementia. Overall, the evidence base is sparse, indirect, and methodologically weak compared with the standards set in major guidelines and trials for dementia care.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that dementia is managed with a combination of evidence-based pharmacologic treatments (when indicated), rigorous control of vascular and metabolic risk factors, structured physical and cognitive activity programs, sensory optimization (such as hearing aids), and comprehensive psychosocial, nursing, and caregiver support, as reflected in contemporary dementia care practice recommendations and large randomized trials. ^[1][5] Chiropractic care is not recognized as a validated treatment for dementia itself; at most, it may be used adjunctively for musculoskeletal complaints, general mobility, and lifestyle counselling, but not as a disease-modifying or primary cognitive therapy. ^[7][28][29] Current high-quality evidence does not support the claim that chiropractic treatment can treat, reverse, or meaningfully slow dementia; any potential neurophysiological effects observed in small pilot studies are considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing. ^{[4][6][26][27]} Under widely accepted frameworks for rating evidence quality, such small, indirect, and imprecise studies are regarded as very low-quality evidence and insufficient to support strong clinical claims. ^[2]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#dementia”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Dementia and Alzheimer disease

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure schizophrenic.

schizophrenic

Supports

There is no high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or major guidelines showing that chiropractic treatment is an effective therapy for schizophrenia itself. ^{[2][6][7][12]} Existing higher-quality evidence for schizophrenia focuses on antipsychotic pharmacotherapy, structured psychosocial interventions (such as CBT-based social skills training), occupational therapy, mind–body exercise like yoga or Tai Chi, and digital or app-based supports, rather than chiropractic manipulation. ^{[1][30][31][32]} These interventions have demonstrated benefits for symptoms, functioning, or cognition in RCTs, but they are not chiropractic care. Therefore, there is no strong evidence base directly supporting chiropractor treatment as a therapeutic modality for schizophrenia.

Contradicts

Mainstream schizophrenia treatment guidelines emphasize antipsychotic medications plus evidence-based psychological and psychosocial interventions (for example CBT, social skills training, supported employment, and structured physical activity) and do not recommend chiropractic manipulation as a treatment for psychosis or schizophrenia. ^[1][2] Current evidence on manual therapies (chiropractic, osteopathic, or related spinal manipulation) and mental health outcomes is sparse, heterogeneous, and low quality, generally limited to small trials, case series, and case reports in anxiety or depression rather than psychotic disorders. ^[12] These data show at most modest, short-term changes in mood or stress, often with substantial risk of bias and imprecision, and do not establish efficacy for treating schizophrenia, which conflicts with any claim that chiropractic care is an effective or primary treatment for this condition. ^[31][32] Major schizophrenia trials and guidelines continue to focus on pharmacologic agents (including second-generation antipsychotics and experimental drugs) and structured psychosocial rehabilitation, underscoring that chiropractic is outside the evidence-based treatment framework for schizophrenia. ^[4][6][30]

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical position is that schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder requiring antipsychotic medication as the cornerstone of treatment, supplemented by evidence-based psychological therapies (such as CBT and social skills training), rehabilitative approaches (occupational therapy, supported employment, and cognitive remediation), and lifestyle or mind–body interventions like yoga or other structured exercise as adjuncts. ^{[1][4][6][7][30][31]} Complementary therapies are considered only as add-ons when evidence demonstrates safety and at least some benefit, but chiropractic spinal manipulation is not recognized as a treatment for schizophrenia in major guidelines and is not supported by robust trials targeting psychotic symptoms. ^[2][5][32] If chiropractic care is used at all in people with schizophrenia, it is only for usual musculoskeletal indications, not as a psychiatric treatment, and it must not replace antipsychotic drugs or established psychosocial interventions.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth #functionalmedicine #depression #amxiety #bipolar #ocd #schizophrenic #rootcause #inflammation #mold #CIRS”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure mold.

mold

Supports

There is no high-quality evidence from randomized trials, systematic reviews, or major clinical guidelines showing that chiropractic treatment can directly treat mold exposure, mold toxicity, or invasive mold infections in humans. ^[33][34] The indexed papers provided are unrelated to chiropractic or mold illness management and instead address unrelated topics such as antifungal drug resistance in neonates, oncology pharmacokinetics, and other neonatal/infant care or GI procedures, none of which support chiropractor-based mold treatment . Academic literature and clinical guidelines on mold-related disease focus on environmental remediation and medical (often antifungal or allergy/asthma-directed) therapy, not spinal manipulation or chiropractic care as a primary or proven treatment modality for mold-related conditions. ^[35]

Contradicts

Clinical and public health guidance documents emphasize that the cornerstone of managing health effects from indoor mold is removal from the mold-contaminated environment, correction of moisture problems, and standard medical care for resulting conditions such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, or invasive fungal infection, not chiropractic manipulation. ^[34][35] Major guidelines on indoor mold and dampness-related illness describe therapeutic steps including exposure cessation, building remediation, and organ-specific medical therapy (e. ^[33] g. , antifungals for invasive disease, inhaled medications for asthma, allergy management) and do not mention chiropractic as a treatment for mold-related illness . Published guidance from environmental and occupational health authorities similarly outlines prevention and remediation strategies and medical evaluation based on symptoms, again with no role for chiropractic as a disease-modifying treatment. Evidence for mold-related illness that does exist (e. g. , regarding asthma control, allergy, and invasive pulmonary mold disease) consistently supports environmental and pharmacologic interventions, not spinal manipulation, and there are no controlled trials demonstrating that chiropractic care improves clinical outcomes specifically attributable to mold exposure or mycotoxin toxicity.

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that mold-related health problems are managed by a combination of environmental control (eliminating moisture and mold growth, remediation of affected buildings, reducing exposure) and evidence-based medical treatments tailored to the specific condition (e. ^[34][35] g. , asthma therapy, allergy management, antifungal drugs for invasive infections). Chiropractic care is not recognized in major guidelines as a treatment for mold exposure, mold toxicity, or invasive mold infections, and is not considered a primary or disease-specific therapy for these conditions. ^[33] While some chiropractors may claim to "support" the body or nervous system during toxin exposure, these assertions are not backed by high-quality clinical trials or incorporated into standard mold management pathways. Mainstream practice therefore does not view chiropractic treatment as an effective or recommended intervention for treating mold itself or reversing mold-related pathology.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth #functionalmedicine #depression #amxiety #bipolar #ocd #schizophrenic #rootcause #inflammation #mold #CIRS”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Mold illness and CIRS

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure chronic inflammatory response syndrome.

chronic inflammatory response syndrome

Supports

No high-quality randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or major clinical guidelines specifically evaluate chiropractic treatment as an effective therapy for chronic inflammatory response syndrome (CIRS). ^[22][36][37] The indexed papers provided are unrelated to chiropractic or CIRS management (they address topics such as neonatal antifungal resistance, chemotherapy pharmacokinetics, metformin for anti‑aging, infant bathing, GI tract examination, thyroid surgery complications, text neck syndrome, and a camlipixant PK study) and therefore do not support the influencer’s claim. Peer‑reviewed literature on CIRS focuses on biotoxin avoidance, toxin binding (e. g. , cholestyramine), management of specific immune and hormonal abnormalities, and, in refractory cases, therapies like vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), not manual spinal manipulation or chiropractic adjustments. A recent review of CIRS treatment shows documented clinical efficacy only for the Shoemaker Protocol and related pharmacologic and environmental interventions, not chiropractic care. Some non–peer‑reviewed or clinic websites describe chiropractors implementing the Shoemaker Protocol as functional medicine providers, but this is delivery of a medical protocol rather than evidence that chiropractic spinal manipulation itself treats CIRS.

Contradicts

Current evidence for CIRS indicates it is a complex, innate‑immune–mediated, multisystem inflammatory illness triggered by biotoxins (e. ^[22][36] g. , mold, ciguatoxin, water‑damaged buildings), with pathophysiology involving neuropeptides (VIP, MSH), complement activation (C4a, C3a), TGF‑β1, and other immune markers. The therapeutic focus in published studies is on eliminating exposure, binding biotoxins, eradicating nasal staph colonization, and targeted pharmacologic normalization of inflammatory and hormonal markers. ^[37] No indexed trial or guideline demonstrates that spinal manipulation or other core chiropractic techniques modify these immune pathways, correct CIRS biomarkers, or resolve CIRS symptoms in a controlled fashion. The only documented treatment with clinical efficacy in peer‑reviewed literature is the Shoemaker Protocol, a stepwise medical protocol; using chiropractic as a primary treatment therefore lacks evidentiary basis and implicitly contradicts the existing treatment data.

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and scientific views regard chronic inflammatory response syndrome, where it is recognized, as an inflammatory condition requiring environmental control, toxin removal, and medically supervised management of specific immune, endocrine, and vascular abnormalities. ^[22][36][37] The core evidence base centers around the Shoemaker Protocol and related pharmacologic and environmental interventions (cholestyramine or other binders, MARCoNS eradication, management of ADH/osmolality, MMP‑9, VEGF, C3a/C4a, TGF‑β1, and VIP replacement), not manual therapies. Major clinical guidelines outside the CIRS niche do not list chiropractic treatment as a recognized or first‑line therapy for systemic inflammatory or biotoxin‑mediated syndromes; chiropractic is generally viewed as an option for musculoskeletal pain management, not for treating chronic systemic inflammatory conditions. Within CIRS‑focused literature, chiropractors may participate in care by applying the Shoemaker Protocol, but the accepted mechanism of benefit is the medical protocol itself rather than chiropractic adjustment per se.

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#chronicinflammatoryresponsesyndrome”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Mold illness and CIRS

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure alzheimers.

alzheimers

Supports

The available higher-level evidence does not show that chiropractic treatment can cure or meaningfully treat Alzheimer’s disease, but a very small amount of exploratory work suggests spinal manipulation may acutely alter brain electrophysiology or networks in people with Alzheimer’s or related cognitive impairment. ^[38] A 2024 pilot randomized cross‑over trial in 14 adults with Alzheimer’s and 14 with Parkinson’s disease found that a single chiropractic spinal adjustment changed somatosensory evoked potentials (15% reduction in N30 peak) and increased resting‑state EEG power and connectivity in the default mode network, but the authors explicitly cautioned that these findings are preliminary and do not establish clinical benefit for Alzheimer’s symptoms or progression. ^[26][27] This supports only the feasibility of studying chiropractic effects on brain activity, not treatment efficacy for Alzheimer’s disease. Narrative reviews aimed at manual therapy providers emphasize that chiropractors can play a role in general supportive care—particularly encouraging exercise, mental activity, and healthy lifestyle—but do not present evidence that spinal manipulation treats Alzheimer’s pathology or reverses dementia. ^[29]

Contradicts

There are no high‑quality randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or major clinical guidelines showing that chiropractic treatment is an effective disease‑modifying or symptomatic treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Existing pilot studies focus on short‑term changes in EEG or evoked potentials after a single adjustment, with very small samples, surrogate neurophysiologic endpoints, and no demonstration of sustained cognitive improvement, slowed decline, or reduced Alzheimer’s biomarkers. ^[26] Major Alzheimer’s trials and guidelines focus on pharmacologic therapies (such as anti‑amyloid antibodies, iron chelation, or other disease‑modifying agents) and comprehensive multidisciplinary care; chiropractic spinal manipulation is not listed among recommended treatments or preventive interventions. ^[27][38] High‑quality evidence on spinal manipulative therapy in older adults shows benefit only for chronic spinal pain conditions, not neurodegenerative dementias, underscoring that the evidence base for Alzheimer’s is essentially absent or extremely weak. ^[29] Overall, the current data contradict any strong claim that chiropractic treatment can meaningfully treat, slow, or reverse Alzheimer’s disease.

Mainstream view

Mainstream medical and scientific consensus is that Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which evidence‑based management consists of a combination of pharmacologic therapies (including recently approved disease‑modifying drugs that target amyloid or other pathways), vascular and lifestyle risk reduction, cognitive and functional support, and multidisciplinary care. ^[29] Chiropractic care is not considered a disease‑modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s and is not recommended in major neurology or dementia guidelines as a specific therapy for cognitive decline. ^[27][38] At most, manual therapy may be used for musculoskeletal complaints (such as back or neck pain) in people who also have Alzheimer’s, and chiropractors may help reinforce general health behaviors, but spinal manipulation itself is not recognized as an effective treatment for dementia. Any suggestion that chiropractic treatment can treat, cure, or substantially alter the course of Alzheimer’s is therefore outside the mainstream evidence‑based position and should be regarded as unproven. ^[26]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#alzheimers”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Dementia and Alzheimer disease

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure hormones.

hormones

Supports

There is some emerging low- to very-low-quality evidence that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), including chiropractic adjustments, can acutely influence certain stress-related endocrine markers such as cortisol and other neuroendocrine mediators in musculoskeletal pain populations. ^{[6][7][40][42]} Small randomized trials report immediate changes in salivary or serum cortisol after cervical or lumbar manipulation compared with mobilization, rest, or sham, suggesting a short-term neuroendocrine response to SMT. ^[39][41] Larger recent RCTs have explored biomarker panels and found that 12 weeks of chiropractic care can modulate stress- and inflammation-related biomarkers (e. g. , cortisol trajectories, BDNF, IL-6, TNF-α) compared with sham care, which supports a plausible neurophysiological influence on neuroendocrine pathways. Systematic reviews of SMT effects on immune-endocrine markers conclude that SMT can trigger activation of the neuroimmunoendocrine system, but they emphasize that the evidence is mixed, heterogeneous, and low certainty, and that the clinical relevance of these biomarker changes is unclear. ^[2] Overall, existing evidence supports only that chiropractic manipulation may have short-term effects on stress-related endocrine biomarkers, not that it reliably treats underlying hormone disorders.

Contradicts

High-quality evidence and major guidelines for endocrine and hormone-related conditions consistently do not recommend chiropractic or spinal manipulation as a primary or disease-modifying treatment for endocrine disorders such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, diabetes, PCOS, adrenal disorders, or pituitary diseases. ^{[6][39][40][41][42]} Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines and other mainstream endocrine guidelines focus on pharmacologic hormone replacement or suppression, lifestyle interventions, surgery, and evidence-based non-pharmacologic adjuncts; they do not list chiropractic care as a treatment modality for correcting hormonal imbalances or reversing endocrine disease. ^[1][2][3] Where chiropractic is mentioned in musculoskeletal or menopause-related pathways, it is framed strictly as conservative management of musculoskeletal symptoms and explicitly excludes endocrine diagnosis or hormone therapy. ^[7] The available clinical studies on SMT and endocrine markers are small, often underpowered, and focused on short-term biomarker changes in otherwise musculoskeletal populations; they do not show correction of hormone deficiencies or excesses, nor sustained normalization of endocrine disease endpoints, and systematic reviews rate the certainty of evidence as low to very low and highlight mixed, conflicting results. Case reports claiming resolution of infertility or endocrine-related problems after chiropractic subluxation-based care are uncontrolled, susceptible to bias and spontaneous improvement, and do not constitute reliable evidence for causal hormone treatment. Taken together, existing evidence contradicts the strong claim that chiropractic treatment effectively treats hormone disorders, and any purported endocrine benefits remain speculative and unsupported by robust trials or guideline endorsement. ^[4]

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that chiropractic care is an evidence-based option for certain musculoskeletal conditions (e. ^{[1][6][40][41][42]} g. , some forms of spinal pain and related functional complaints), but it is not an established or guideline-endorsed treatment for endocrine or hormonal disorders. ^[4] Major endocrine guidelines and expert societies recommend diagnosis and management of hormone conditions primarily through endocrinology-led care: appropriate laboratory evaluation, imaging when needed, and treatments such as hormone replacement, pharmacologic modulation, surgery, and lifestyle interventions. ^[2][5] Short-term changes in stress or inflammatory biomarkers observed after spinal manipulation are regarded as physiological responses whose clinical significance for endocrine disease is not established. ^[3][39] As a result, chiropractic may be used as an adjunct for musculoskeletal symptoms in patients who also have endocrine disorders, but it is not considered capable of correcting or curing hormone imbalances, nor is it recommended as a substitute or primary therapy for endocrine diseases. ^[7]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#hormones”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Hormone imbalance and replacement

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure functional medicine.

functional medicine

Supports

There is moderate-quality evidence that chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy is about as effective as other recommended therapies (such as standard medical care and physical therapy) for short‑term pain relief and small improvements in function in adults with chronic low back pain.^[12][14] Some randomized controlled trials show clinically meaningful reductions in pain and disability with structured courses of chiropractic spinal manipulation (around 12 sessions over 6 weeks) in chronic non‑specific low back pain, with benefits sustained up to 52 weeks.^{[2][7][11][12][14]} A Cochrane review and other systematic reviews indicate that for acute and subacute low back pain, combined chiropractic interventions can slightly improve pain and disability in the short and medium term compared with other treatments, though long‑term differences are minimal.^{[8][12][14][16]} Overall, high‑quality evidence supports chiropractic care as a reasonable option for musculoskeletal spinal pain (especially low back pain), broadly comparable to other conservative treatments.^[5][12][14] contradicts

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#functionalmedicine”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure brain health.

brain health

Supports

There is emerging but very limited clinical evidence that certain chiropractic interventions may influence specific cognitive or visual‑cognitive symptoms in narrowly defined patient groups, which could be framed as a limited aspect of “brain health.” A single‑blind randomized controlled trial in young adults with persistent post‑concussion symptoms (mild traumatic brain injury) found that a chiropractic intervention improved Stroop test performance (selective attention/processing speed) and several measures of gaze stability and egocentric localization compared with an active control, although pursuit tracking worsened; authors concluded chiropractic care may alleviate some visual and cognitive symptoms in this population.^[19] A randomized controlled study on chiropractic care and resting‑state EEG in people with mild cognitive impairment reported changes in brain activity suggestive of augmented cognitive function, but this evidence is early, with small samples, surrogate outcomes, and uncertain clinical significance. Pilot and small experimental studies have shown acute changes in cortical processing or reaction time measures after cervical spine adjustments, suggesting that spinal manipulation can transiently modulate aspects of neural processing, though these do not establish durable benefits on global brain health or disease outcomes. Overall, the best available evidence consists of small RCTs and mechanistic studies indicating possible short‑term effects on specific cognitive or visuomotor parameters, but not broad improvements in brain health outcomes such as dementia incidence, long‑term cognition, or stroke recovery.^[19]

Contradicts

High‑quality evidence and systematic reviews do not support broad claims that chiropractic treatment improves overall brain health, and they emphasize that any observed neurophysiologic changes have unclear clinical relevance. A systematic review of spinal manipulation and brain function concluded that although some studies report changes in ‘brain function’ measures (EEG, fMRI, reaction time), findings are inconsistent and the clinical importance is unknown; the authors explicitly state there is presently no evidence that spinal manipulation has a beneficial effect on brain function or health outcomes and that it is premature to promote spinal manipulation as a treatment to improve brain function.^[2][4] A clinical study evaluating chiropractic adjustments and cognitive function found reductions in pain but no significant improvements in cognition, indicating that symptom relief in musculoskeletal domains does not necessarily translate into better cognitive performance.^[3] Major neurology guidelines for conditions with clear brain‑health relevance (e.g., EFNS guideline on tension‑type headache) focus on pharmacologic therapies, behavioral approaches, and sometimes physiotherapy, and do not recommend chiropractic or spinal manipulation as a brain‑health intervention.^[3] In addition, the safety profile of cervical spinal manipulation raises concern when brain health is the focus: case‑control and guideline‑level evidence report a small but real risk of vertebral artery dissection and vertebrobasilar stroke temporally associated with cervical manipulative therapy, especially in younger adults, with estimated incidence around 1.3 cases per 100,000 persons under 45 receiving cervical manipulation within one week and evidence rated weak to moderate for causation between cervical manipulation and vertebral artery dissection and stroke.^[9] Practice guidelines and expert reviews recommend explicit informed consent regarding stroke risk before cervical spine manipulation, underscoring that manipulation directed at the neck can in rare cases directly harm brain health via ischemic stroke rather than improve it.^[10][9] Taken together, existing evidence contradicts strong claims that chiropractic treatment generally enhances brain health and highlights both limited efficacy data and small but serious neurological risks for some techniques.^{[2][4][9][10]}

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific position is that chiropractic care is an established modality for certain musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., some forms of back and neck pain), but it is not recognized as a proven treatment for improving overall brain health, cognition, or preventing neurological disease. Major clinical guidelines addressing brain‑related outcomes—such as hypertension guidelines for stroke prevention, nutrition guidelines for inflammatory and systemic conditions, and neurology guidelines for headaches—do not include chiropractic manipulation as an evidence‑based strategy to enhance brain health or cognitive function, instead emphasizing pharmacologic management, lifestyle modification, physical exercise, and other rehabilitative approaches.^{[0][3][2][18]} Systematic reviews of spinal manipulation and brain function explicitly conclude that current evidence is insufficient to claim clinically meaningful benefits on brain function and that promoting chiropractic as a brain‑health therapy is premature.^[2][4] Neurology and stroke experts acknowledge a rare but clinically important association between cervical manipulative therapy and vertebral artery dissection/vertebrobasilar stroke, and professional guidance supports discussing this potential risk with patients prior to cervical spine manipulation.^[9][10] Mainstream practice therefore views chiropractic as potentially useful for selected musculoskeletal complaints, but not as a core or validated intervention for brain health, and it cautions against overstated claims

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#brainhealth”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)

Jonah Dallas Yakel is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure rootcause.

rootcause

Supports

High-quality evidence supports chiropractic care as an evidence-based option for certain musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., low back pain, neck pain, some headache types) and as part of guideline-driven spine care programs, but this is about symptom management, not correcting a universal “root cause” of disease.^[8] Broader medical guidelines emphasize addressing pathophysiologic risk factors and lifestyle determinants (e.g., hypertension, nutrition) as root causes of chronic disease; these are managed with pharmacologic therapy and structured lifestyle interventions rather than chiropractic adjustment.^[0][2][3] Recent randomized trials show that chiropractic spinal adjustments can modulate some systemic biomarkers (inflammation, stress, neurotrophic factors), which suggests potential systemic physiological effects beyond local musculoskeletal symptoms, but these findings are preliminary, modest in magnitude, and do not demonstrate correction of root causes of disease.^[12]

Contradicts

Systematic review evidence concludes that chiropractic treatment does not have demonstrated effects for primary or early secondary prevention of disease in general and that the traditional vitalistic concept of spinal “subluxation” as a root cause of systemic disease lacks biological plausibility and proof of validity.^[9] A united statement from global chiropractic researchers explicitly notes that claims that chiropractic adjustments improve immune function or prevent infectious illnesses are not supported by robust evidence and that no published studies demonstrate clinically meaningful immune enhancement or prevention of viral infections from spinal manipulation.^[14] Clinical practice guidelines and medical policy documents state that spinal manipulation for non-musculoskeletal conditions is not medically necessary, and evidence for benefit in such conditions is sparse, low quality, and inconsistent, reinforcing that chiropractic treatment should not be promoted as a root-cause therapy for systemic or non-musculoskeletal diseases.^[4][11] Major medical and specialty guidelines for hypertension, clinical nutrition, headache, pericardial disease, transfusion therapy, and parenteral nutrition delineate root causes and evidence-based management strategies that rely on pharmacologic therapy, nutrition support, and other established interventions, with no role for chiropractic manipulation as a root-cause or disease-modifying treatment.^{[0][1][2][3][5][6][7]}

Mainstream view

The mainstream medical and scientific view is that chiropractic care is an evidence-based, guideline-supported option for certain musculoskeletal pain conditions and specific headache types, primarily for symptom relief and functional improvement, not for treating the root cause of systemic diseases.^[8][3] Root-cause management of chronic and systemic diseases (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease) focuses on controlling defined risk factors and disease mechanisms through pharmacologic therapy, nutrition interventions, lifestyle medicine, and other established medical treatments according to high-quality guidelines and trials, none of which consider chiropractic adjustments to be a root-cause intervention.^{[0][2][3][19][23]} Mainstream evidence-based frameworks (such as GRADE) emphasize the need for high-certainty data before adopting treatments for disease causation or prevention, and current data for chiropractic beyond musculoskeletal indications are insufficient to support claims that it treats the root cause of disease.^[5][9][14]

In their own wordsView sourceArchived copy

“#rootcause”

Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871(a)