Sarah Drake alias The Upper-Cervical Lab Whisperer
running the vibes clinic at Drake Chiropractic
Website · drakechiroandrehab.com
Practice location
913-708-0867 LOCATION 2722 N 155th Street
Basehor, KS 66007
In this material, the subject presents themselves as qualified to treat, or gives advice on, these children's conditions. A pediatrician or a pediatric specialist treats each one:
- Autism Where this care belongs: A developmental behavioral pediatrician or child neurologist. Find one in Kansas
- Infant colic and reflux Where this care belongs: A pediatrician. Find one in Kansas
- Ear infections Where this care belongs: A pediatrician or an ear, nose and throat specialist. Find one in Kansas
- Torticollis and infant development Where this care belongs: A pediatrician or a pediatric physical therapist. Find one in Kansas
A chiropractic license in Kansas covers the spine, joints and muscles. It does not cover diagnosing or treating these conditions.
Funnel-first framing that runs on persuasion, light on published evidence.
- Of 18 health claims, 11 run counter to or conflict with the published evidence, and 6 were not independently checked.
- Primary persuasion tactic: Functional lab mystique.
- Stated credentials look inflated relative to the advice given.
- Profits from the products and labs they recommend, with no clear disclosure.
- Gives advice beyond what their license covers.
Sarah Drake and Matt Drake have the polished family-chiropractic aesthetic down cold: gentle adjustments, nervous-system buzzwords, and just enough pediatric anxiety to keep the bookings warm. The real art form is sliding from spine care into functional testing and condition claims that sound medical enough to sell, but broad enough to outrun the scope.
High grift signals
Score breakdown
Direct answer
Sarah Drake is licensed in Kansas as a chiropractor (DC), not as an MD or DO, and Kansas's chiropractic scope statute (K.S.A. 65-2871) limits that license to musculoskeletal care, not the diagnosis or treatment of systemic disease. Even so, they advertise diagnosing or treating On the autism spectrum, functional lab testing, food sensitivity evaluations, Colic or excessive fussiness, and Torticollis and head tilt, conditions that belong with appropriately board-certified physicians. Those same pages route patients toward lab panels and paid programs that Sarah Drake profits from.
Key findings
- Lab Test Upsell: This sells special testing as the way to find hidden causes of vague symptoms like fatigue, skin issues, and digestive distress. Food sensitivity panels are widely criticized for poor validity and for encouraging unnecessary restriction and follow-up purchases.see section ↓
- Claim "When this area is misaligned, it can trigger a cascade of nervous system dysfunction": not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.see section ↓
- Claim "functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations to help you uncover the hidden st…": mixed in the medical literature.see section ↓
- NPI registry confirms Sarah Drake as Chiropractor (DC) in Kansas (NPI 1871974675).see section ↓
- Sarah Drake shows credential inflation relative to stated vs likely credentials.see section ↓
- Dr Sarah Drake is marketed with a doctor title, but reviewed credentials indicate Chiropractor (DC) rather than an MD/DO physician license.see section ↓
- Against Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) scope rules (K.S.A. 65-2871), these advertised activities appear outside Sarah Drake's license (including conditions they merely list as ones they treat): Dealing with inflammation or autoimmune tendencies, On the autism spectrum, Implying…see section ↓
- 17 of 21 advertised activities fall outside permitted Chiropractor scope in KS.see section ↓
Claims & evidence
In their own published words, they present themselves as qualified to treat, or give advice on, 14 conditions or treatments. A chiropractic license covers the spine, joints and muscles, and the scope review placed each one outside it. Each box leads with state-board scope notation; literature cross-check follows when we matched a specific claim. Every card carries its receipts: the quoted wording, a live source link, and an archived copy.
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to advertise Dealing with inflammation or autoimmune tendencies as within their scope of practice.
Dealing with inflammation or autoimmune tendencies
PubMed indexes 10 randomized human trials on this intervention and outcome. The randomized evidence in our literature check points against the claim as stated. The animal and in-vitro literature on the same terms is 8 times larger, at 81 studies. A systematic review found no acceptable- or high-quality randomized trials showing spinal manipulation improves immune or disease-specific outcomes; biomarker changes have no established clinical benefit.
- Randomized human trials
- 10
- Animal or in-vitro only
- 81
Search: (spinal manipulation OR chiropractic) AND (inflammation OR autoimmune disease)
- Supports
- There is emerging but very preliminary evidence that chiropractic spinal adjustments can modulate some circulating inflammatory and stress-related biomarkers (for example, changes in IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, BDNF, and cortisol) in adults over 12–16 weeks compared with sham care, suggesting a possible biological effect on inflammatory pathways, but these findings are limited to biomarkers and not clinical autoimmune outcomes. A 2024 integrative review on vertebral subluxation and systems biology reports case studies, small trials, and theoretical models suggesting chiropractic adjustments may influence neuro‑endocrine‑immune function, but emphasizes that this is largely hypothesis‑generating rather than definitive clinical evidence. These data support, at most, a potential for chiropractic care to affect immune and inflammatory markers, not that it treats or modifies autoimmune disease, and no high-quality guidelines currently endorse chiropractic as a disease‑modifying treatment for inflammation or autoimmunity.
- Contradicts
- A 2021 systematic review in a major medical journal examining spinal manipulative therapy and infectious disease/immune outcomes found no clinical evidence from acceptable- or high-quality randomized controlled trials that spinal manipulation is efficacious or effective in changing immune system outcomes, preventing infectious disease, or improving disease‑specific outcomes via immune effects. Consensus statements from the global chiropractic research community similarly conclude there is no valid clinical scientific evidence that chiropractic care can impact the immune system in a way that justifies claims of boosting immunity or treating immune-related diseases. Where short‑term changes in immune or endocrine biomarkers have been observed after spinal manipulation, the clinical relevance of these changes is unknown, and they have not been linked to improvements in inflammatory or autoimmune disease activity. Major evidence-based guidelines for inflammatory and autoimmune conditions (such as ESPEN’s guideline on clinical nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease, which focuses on diet, nutritional support, and standard medical therapy) do not list chiropractic or spinal manipulation as a treatment for underlying inflammation or autoimmune pathophysiology. Overall, high-quality systematic reviews and guidelines contradict strong claims that chiropractic treatment can meaningfully treat inflammation or autoimmune tendencies, beyond possible symptomatic relief of associated musculoskeletal pain.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream medical and scientific position is that chiropractic care is primarily a musculoskeletal intervention (for conditions like low back and neck pain) and is not an established, evidence-based treatment for systemic inflammation or autoimmune diseases. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses support modest short-term benefits of spinal manipulative therapy on pain and function in musculoskeletal disorders, but they do not demonstrate clinically meaningful effects on immune function, inflammatory disease activity, or autoimmune outcomes. Major guidelines for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (for example, those addressing inflammatory bowel disease nutrition or other systemic conditions) emphasize pharmacologic therapy, lifestyle measures, and condition-specific rehabilitation, and do not recommend chiropractic manipulation as a disease-modifying therapy. Leading chiropractic and medical research bodies have explicitly warned against claims that spinal adjustments boost immunity or treat immune-related diseases, citing a lack of credible, high-quality evidence. Chiropractic care may be used as an adjunct for symptom relief in patients who also have autoimmune conditions (e.g., to address mechanical back pain), but it is not considered a treatment for the autoimmune or inflammatory process itself, and patients are advised to continue guideline-directed medical management.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]
“Dealing with inflammation or autoimmune tendencies”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Autoimmune disease
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to advertise On the autism spectrum as within their scope of practice.
On the autism spectrum
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“On the autism spectrum”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Autism
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations to help you uncover the hidden stressors that may be affecting your energy, digestion, mood, and overall vitality.
functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations to help you uncover the hidden stressors that may be affecting your energy, digestion, mood, and overall vitality
- Supports
- There is some randomized controlled trial evidence that elimination diets guided by IgG-based food sensitivity panels can modestly improve gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in a subset of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, which may secondarily affect energy and overall well‑being. Open-label studies also report improved quality of life when patients with self-reported gastrointestinal disorders follow IgG-guided elimination diets, suggesting that food-related factors can influence digestive symptoms and perceived vitality, although these designs are weaker and more prone to bias. Reviews on food hypersensitivity in IBS acknowledge that food-related mechanisms (including immune and non-immune pathways) can contribute to IBS symptoms and that some patients improve on elimination diets, supporting a limited role for carefully structured dietary interventions in digestive complaints and associated fatigue.
- Contradicts
- Major professional allergy and immunology guidelines strongly state that food-specific IgG and IgG4 testing is not validated and should not be used to diagnose food allergy, intolerance, or sensitivity, indicating that such tests do not reliably identify clinically relevant "hidden stressors" affecting symptoms. Position papers emphasize that IgG antibodies largely reflect exposure and possible tolerance rather than pathology, so using them as a basis for broad food sensitivity panels is considered unproven and potentially misleading for mood, energy, and nonspecific vitality complaints. Critical appraisals of IgG-guided diets in IBS note that the overall symptom benefit is modest, that not all patients respond, and that the clinical usefulness of IgG testing remains doubtful, suggesting any effect may be fortuitous rather than due to accurate identification of causative foods. There is no high-quality evidence or guideline support that large "functional lab" panels or commercial food sensitivity tests meaningfully diagnose or treat broad issues such as mood, general energy, or overall vitality beyond specific conditions like IBS, and mainstream guidelines for nutrition, headache, hypertension, or parenteral nutrition do not recommend such testing for these outcomes.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream medical and scientific position is that functional lab panels and commercial food sensitivity testing, particularly IgG-based tests, are not validated diagnostic tools for uncovering generalized hidden stressors affecting energy, digestion, mood, or vitality, and they are not recommended by major allergy and immunology societies or clinical practice guidelines for routine patient care. Standard practice is to assess digestive, fatigue, and mood symptoms using established clinical evaluation, focused laboratory tests when indicated, and evidence-based interventions (such as dietitian-guided elimination diets, management of IBS, mental health care, and treatment of specific diseases) rather than broad, non-validated functional testing. While elimination diets may be used in selected patients with suspected food-related IBS or true food allergy, they are typically guided by history, standard IgE-based testing or oral food challenges, and structured dietary protocols, not by wide food sensitivity panels marketed for general vitality or mood optimization.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][5][6][4][7][13][14][15][16][17]
“functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations to help you uncover the hidden stressors that may be affecting your energy, digestion, mood, and overall vitality”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure Upper Cervical care can benefit those dealing with: Dizziness or vertigo, Migraines and chronic headaches, Post-concussion symptoms, Neurological disorders, Nervous system overload and fatigue.
Upper Cervical care can benefit those dealing with: Dizziness or vertigo, Migraines and chronic headaches, Post-concussion symptoms, Neurological disorders, Nervous system overload and fatigue
- Supports
- For dizziness/cervical-related vertigo, there is some low- to moderate-certainty evidence that upper cervical or manual therapy can improve dizziness impact and intensity in selected patients with cervicogenic dizziness, including randomized trials summarized in systematic reviews. A 2022 systematic review found moderate-quality evidence that manual therapy reduces cervicogenic dizziness and balance symptoms, and a 2025 systematic review/meta-analysis found low- to very low-certainty evidence of benefit for upper cervical interventions versus control/placebo . For headaches, chiropractic/spinal manipulation has been studied for cervicogenic headache and tension-type headache, and a chiropractic guideline recommended manipulation and multimodal care for cervicogenic or tension-type headache .
- Contradicts
- The claim is much broader than the evidence. The best-supported evidence is for cervicogenic dizziness and some headache syndromes, not for a general statement that upper cervical care benefits all people with vertigo, migraines, post-concussion symptoms, neurological disorders, nervous system overload, or fatigue. Evidence for migraine is inconsistent and recent systematic review evidence says spinal manipulation for migraine remains unproven . The claim does not have high-quality support for post-concussion symptoms, neurological disorders, or vague constructs like nervous system overload and fatigue; those areas are mainly limited to case reports or theoretical discussion rather than robust RCTs or major guidelines. There is also a safety concern: serious adverse events, especially vascular events, have been reported after cervical procedures, most often manipulation . The guideline on tension-type headache in the listed papers does not establish upper cervical care as a treatment for the broader set of claims, and the evidence base cited for chiropractic headache care is narrower than the influencer’s wording .
- Mainstream view
- Mainstream medicine does not view upper cervical care as an evidence-based treatment for neurological disorders, post-concussion syndrome, nonspecific fatigue, or generalized nervous system overload. For dizziness, a cervicogenic subtype can sometimes be managed with manual therapy or rehabilitation, but diagnosis is specific and evidence quality is limited; for headaches, manual therapy may help some cervicogenic or tension-type headache patients, while migraine benefit remains uncertain and not established as a standard treatment . The overall medical view is that any potential benefit is condition-specific, modest at best, and not strong enough to support broad claims covering multiple unrelated neurologic symptoms.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][5][6][4][7][8][18][19][20][21]
“Upper Cervical care can benefit those dealing with:Dizziness or vertigoMigraines and chronic headachesPost-concussion symptomsNeurological disordersNervous system overload and fatigue”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Concussion and brain injury
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure Many parents see significant improvements in these common childhood concerns through gentle, neurologically-focused chiropractic care.
Many parents see significant improvements in these common childhood concerns through gentle, neurologically-focused chiropractic care
- Supports
- High-quality evidence for pediatric chiropractic care is limited and condition-specific. A randomized controlled trial in infantile colic found that chiropractic spinal manipulation was no more effective than placebo for reducing colic symptoms, which does not support broad claims of “significant improvements” but does show that such care can be studied rigorously in RCTs. Systematic reviews and narrative reviews of manual therapy in children report that serious adverse events appear rare, especially when gentle, low-force techniques are used, suggesting that gentle pediatric chiropractic care is probably low risk in most hands, although true risk rates are uncertain. Observational and survey-based studies of pediatric chiropractic (including practice-based research networks) consistently report high parental satisfaction and perceived improvement in children’s presenting complaints and some non-specific outcomes such as sleep or general well‑being, but these data are subject to strong bias and do not constitute high-level evidence of efficacy.
- Contradicts
- Systematic reviews of pediatric chiropractic and spinal manipulation for non‑musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., colic, otitis media, asthma, behavioral or neurologic issues) consistently conclude that the evidence is of low quality and does not demonstrate convincing benefit. A systematic review of randomized trials of chiropractic spinal manipulation for infantile colic found that the totality of evidence fails to demonstrate effectiveness, directly contradicting claims of significant improvement in this common childhood concern. Evidence for spinal manipulative therapy in pediatric otitis media is limited and of poor methodological quality, with reviews stating that current data are insufficient to support or refute benefit and explicitly warning that manual therapy for non‑musculoskeletal pediatric disorders should not be promoted as effective in the absence of robust evidence. An independent review commissioned by a health authority on spinal manipulation in children found very poor evidence of effectiveness overall, with no evidence of benefit for headache, asthma, otitis media, cerebral palsy, hyperactivity, or torticollis, and concluded that spinal manipulation cannot be recommended for these conditions. Available safety reviews emphasize that while most reported adverse events are mild and transient, the risk of moderate and severe adverse events is unknown, and serious complications have been described, which further undercuts strong benefit claims without clear evidence of net clinical gain.
- Mainstream view
- Mainstream pediatric and neurology practice does not regard chiropractic care—whether gentle or described as neurologically focused—as an evidence‑based treatment for common childhood medical or neurodevelopmental concerns such as colic, otitis media, asthma, ADHD, autism, sleep problems, or behavioral issues. Major clinical guidelines and evidence‑based frameworks in pediatrics, neurology, and general practice emphasize established interventions supported by randomized trials and high‑quality systematic reviews, and they do not recommend chiropractic manipulation for these conditions. Where manual therapy is discussed (e.g., for musculoskeletal pain in older children or adolescents), it is framed as an adjunct for specific musculoskeletal complaints rather than a general neurologic or developmental treatment. Current evidence syntheses characterize pediatric chiropractic efficacy for non‑musculoskeletal conditions as unproven, with low‑quality and inconsistent data, and they caution clinicians and chiropractors not to misrepresent chiropractic care as effective where scientific evidence is lacking.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][3][2][5][4][6][7][8][22][23][24][25]
“Many parents see significant improvements in these common childhood concerns through gentle, neurologically-focused chiropractic care”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure We work with infants and children experiencing: Birth stress and difficult deliveries, Torticollis, Breastfeeding challenges and latch issues, Sleep disturbances and colic, Reflux, digestive discomfort, and gas, Ear infections and sinus pressure, Developmental delays or missed milestones, Behavioral changes or trouble focusing.
We work with infants and children experiencing: Birth stress and difficult deliveries, Torticollis, Breastfeeding challenges and latch issues, Sleep disturbances and colic, Reflux, digestive discomfort, and gas, Ear infections and sinus pressure, Developmental delays or missed milestones, Behavioral changes or trouble focusing
- Supports
- The strongest support in the listed evidence is limited to infant colic and, to a lesser extent, manual therapy for crying outcomes. A 2020 systematic review of systematic reviews and national guidelines found weaker but favorable evidence for manual therapy in infantile colic, with crying-time benefit as the main outcome. A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis reported chiropractic therapy was associated with reduced crying time in infantile colic, but also emphasized low-quality and heterogeneous studies. A 2011 systematic review of chiropractic care for infant colic concluded the literature contained some clinical trials, but called for more research rather than making a strong causal claim.
- Contradicts
- The claim is much broader than the evidence base. The 2009 systematic review of randomized trials concluded the evidence did not demonstrate that chiropractic spinal manipulation is effective for infant colic and that the claim was not supported by convincing rigorous data. For the non-colic conditions listed in the claim, high-quality evidence was not identified here showing that chiropractic care treats birth stress or difficult deliveries, torticollis, breastfeeding latch problems, reflux, digestive discomfort, gas, ear infections, sinus pressure, developmental delays, missed milestones, behavioral changes, or trouble focusing. The listed papers are unrelated to these pediatric claims and do not supply supporting evidence for them. For congenital muscular torticollis, pediatric physical therapy guidelines exist, but the evidence-based direction is PT management rather than chiropractic manipulation, and cervical manipulation is not recommended in that guideline context. For reflux and digestive symptoms, the available evidence in the search results is mainly case reports or selective reviews, which are weak forms of evidence and do not establish efficacy. More generally, guideline-level evidence for infant manual therapy outside colic remains sparse or absent, and the favorable studies that do exist are limited by low quality and heterogeneity.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream medical view is that chiropractic or manual therapy is not an evidence-based treatment for the broad set of infant and child problems listed in the claim. At most, there is limited, low-certainty evidence that some manual therapies may reduce crying time in infant colic, but this does not support treating reflux, ear infections, developmental delay, behavioral problems, or breastfeeding latch issues, and it does not establish a general pediatric therapeutic effect.
Papers listed for this claim:[26][1][2][3][5][6][4][7][27][28][29][30]
“We work with infants and children experiencing:Birth stress and difficult deliveriesTorticollis and head turning preferencesBreastfeeding challenges and latch issuesSleep disturbances and colicReflux, digestive discomfort, and gasEar infections and sinus pressureDevelopmental delays or missed milestonesBehavioral changes or trouble focusing”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Infant colic and reflux
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to advertise Routine adjustments can: Improve posture and alignment, Enhance immune function, Boost focus and mental clarity, Reduce frequency of illness as within their scope of practice.
Routine adjustments can: Improve posture and alignment, Enhance immune function, Boost focus and mental clarity, Reduce frequency of illness
PubMed indexes 68 randomized human trials on this intervention and outcome. The randomized evidence in our literature check points against the claim as stated. Trials and reviews do not show clinically meaningful immune benefits or fewer illnesses; evidence for better posture is limited, and cognitive benefits have not been demonstrated.
- Randomized human trials
- 68
- Animal or in-vitro only
- 40
Search: (spinal manipulation OR chiropractic) AND (posture OR immune function OR "mental clarity" OR "illness frequency")
- Supports
- High-quality evidence does not show that routine spinal adjustments broadly improve immune function, reduce illness frequency, or enhance cognition, though there is some emerging evidence that spinal manipulation can modulate certain physiological biomarkers and pain-related mechanisms in specific contexts. A recent pragmatic randomized controlled trial in adults with subclinical spinal pain found that 12 weeks of chiropractic care was associated with changes in neuroplasticity, stress, and inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., increased BDNF and IL-6, decreased TNF-α, changes in cortisol and IFN-γ), suggesting modulation of physiological systemic biomarkers, but not demonstrating fewer infections or clinically relevant immune enhancement. Some randomized trials in chronic low back or neck pain show that spinal manipulation can reduce pain intensity and improve function, which may secondarily affect posture and local proprioception; a 2024 RCT in non-specific chronic low back pain showed that a single spinal manipulation session enhanced lumbar proprioceptive input and was associated with pain relief in those with certain baseline proprioceptive profiles, which is biologically plausible for improving local alignment and postural control in that pain population. Another trial comparing stabilization exercises, chiropractic manipulation, and their combination in healthy individuals found improvements in muscular endurance, strength, and balance across active interventions, which could support modest, short-term effects on musculoskeletal performance rather than global posture or systemic health.
- Contradicts
- Systematic reviews and consensus statements specifically addressing immunity and illness frequency report a lack of credible evidence that spinal adjustments clinically enhance immune function or reduce infectious disease incidence. A systematic review of studies evaluating spinal manipulative therapy and immune outcomes found no acceptable- or high-quality clinical trials demonstrating efficacy in preventing infectious disease or improving disease-specific outcomes through immune modulation; observed biomarker changes were short-term and of unclear clinical significance. A united statement from global chiropractic researchers noted that no valid clinical scientific evidence shows chiropractic care can impact the immune system in a way that prevents viral colds, flu, or other community-shared illnesses, and that such a hypothesis has never been properly tested in rigorous trials. A World Federation of Chiropractic evidence review similarly concluded that no credible scientific evidence exists to support claims that spinal adjustment/manipulation has any clinically relevant effect on the immune system, and available studies are small, often in asymptomatic subjects, and do not justify clinical claims of enhanced immunity or reduced illness. Trials examining immediate systemic neuroimmune responses after spinal mobilisation/manipulation in neck pain patients have not found significant or clinically meaningful differences in systemic neuroimmune markers compared with placebo mobilization, contradicting strong claims of immune boosting. Regarding posture and alignment, imaging-based secondary analyses in older adults receiving chiropractic spinal manipulation plus exercise found no association between baseline radiographic alignment/degeneration factors and clinical outcome improvements, suggesting that radiographic “alignment” changes are not clearly linked to better disability outcomes. Moreover, several RCTs in chronic low back pain report that a single manipulation session does not meaningfully alter balance or pressure pain thresholds compared with placebo, indicating that any postural effects are limited and not robustly established as routine health benefits. There is essentially no high-quality evidence that routine spinal adjustments improve focus or mental clarity in healthy individuals; cognitive outcomes are rarely measured, and biomarker modulation (e.g., BDNF) has not been tied to clinically demonstrated cognitive enhancement or work/school performance.
- Mainstream view
- Mainstream medical and scientific opinion is that chiropractic spinal manipulation has a role as one option for managing certain musculoskeletal pain conditions (especially some forms of low back and neck pain), where evidence shows modest short- to medium-term improvements in pain and function for some patients. However, major guidelines for conditions like hypertension, inflammatory bowel disease, parenteral nutrition, and tension-type headache focus on pharmacologic, lifestyle, and evidence-based non-pharmacologic therapies, and do not recommend chiropractic or routine spinal adjustments as a means to improve systemic immunity, prevent illness, or enhance cognition. Evidence hierarchies such as GRADE emphasize that claims about treatment benefits must be grounded in high-quality trials and precise estimates, and current data on chiropractic and immunity or illness prevention are considered low or very low certainty, with substantial imprecision and indirectness. Professional chiropractic bodies and research groups
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][5][4][6][7][8][31][32][33][34]
“Routine adjustments can:Improve posture and alignmentEnhance immune functionBoost focus and mental clarityReduce frequency of illnessDecrease stress on joints and muscles”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure functional lab testing.
functional lab testing
- Supports
- There is some randomized controlled trial evidence that elimination diets guided by IgG-based food sensitivity panels can modestly improve gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in a subset of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, which may secondarily affect energy and overall well‑being. Open-label studies also report improved quality of life when patients with self-reported gastrointestinal disorders follow IgG-guided elimination diets, suggesting that food-related factors can influence digestive symptoms and perceived vitality, although these designs are weaker and more prone to bias. Reviews on food hypersensitivity in IBS acknowledge that food-related mechanisms (including immune and non-immune pathways) can contribute to IBS symptoms and that some patients improve on elimination diets, supporting a limited role for carefully structured dietary interventions in digestive complaints and associated fatigue.
- Contradicts
- Major professional allergy and immunology guidelines strongly state that food-specific IgG and IgG4 testing is not validated and should not be used to diagnose food allergy, intolerance, or sensitivity, indicating that such tests do not reliably identify clinically relevant "hidden stressors" affecting symptoms. Position papers emphasize that IgG antibodies largely reflect exposure and possible tolerance rather than pathology, so using them as a basis for broad food sensitivity panels is considered unproven and potentially misleading for mood, energy, and nonspecific vitality complaints. Critical appraisals of IgG-guided diets in IBS note that the overall symptom benefit is modest, that not all patients respond, and that the clinical usefulness of IgG testing remains doubtful, suggesting any effect may be fortuitous rather than due to accurate identification of causative foods. There is no high-quality evidence or guideline support that large "functional lab" panels or commercial food sensitivity tests meaningfully diagnose or treat broad issues such as mood, general energy, or overall vitality beyond specific conditions like IBS, and mainstream guidelines for nutrition, headache, hypertension, or parenteral nutrition do not recommend such testing for these outcomes.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream medical and scientific position is that functional lab panels and commercial food sensitivity testing, particularly IgG-based tests, are not validated diagnostic tools for uncovering generalized hidden stressors affecting energy, digestion, mood, or vitality, and they are not recommended by major allergy and immunology societies or clinical practice guidelines for routine patient care. Standard practice is to assess digestive, fatigue, and mood symptoms using established clinical evaluation, focused laboratory tests when indicated, and evidence-based interventions (such as dietitian-guided elimination diets, management of IBS, mental health care, and treatment of specific diseases) rather than broad, non-validated functional testing. While elimination diets may be used in selected patients with suspected food-related IBS or true food allergy, they are typically guided by history, standard IgE-based testing or oral food challenges, and structured dietary protocols, not by wide food sensitivity panels marketed for general vitality or mood optimization.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][5][6][4][7][13][14][15][16][17]
“functional lab testing”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure food sensitivity evaluations.
food sensitivity evaluations
- Supports
- There is some randomized controlled trial evidence that elimination diets guided by IgG-based food sensitivity panels can modestly improve gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in a subset of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, which may secondarily affect energy and overall well‑being. Open-label studies also report improved quality of life when patients with self-reported gastrointestinal disorders follow IgG-guided elimination diets, suggesting that food-related factors can influence digestive symptoms and perceived vitality, although these designs are weaker and more prone to bias. Reviews on food hypersensitivity in IBS acknowledge that food-related mechanisms (including immune and non-immune pathways) can contribute to IBS symptoms and that some patients improve on elimination diets, supporting a limited role for carefully structured dietary interventions in digestive complaints and associated fatigue.
- Contradicts
- Major professional allergy and immunology guidelines strongly state that food-specific IgG and IgG4 testing is not validated and should not be used to diagnose food allergy, intolerance, or sensitivity, indicating that such tests do not reliably identify clinically relevant "hidden stressors" affecting symptoms. Position papers emphasize that IgG antibodies largely reflect exposure and possible tolerance rather than pathology, so using them as a basis for broad food sensitivity panels is considered unproven and potentially misleading for mood, energy, and nonspecific vitality complaints. Critical appraisals of IgG-guided diets in IBS note that the overall symptom benefit is modest, that not all patients respond, and that the clinical usefulness of IgG testing remains doubtful, suggesting any effect may be fortuitous rather than due to accurate identification of causative foods. There is no high-quality evidence or guideline support that large "functional lab" panels or commercial food sensitivity tests meaningfully diagnose or treat broad issues such as mood, general energy, or overall vitality beyond specific conditions like IBS, and mainstream guidelines for nutrition, headache, hypertension, or parenteral nutrition do not recommend such testing for these outcomes.
- Mainstream view
- The mainstream medical and scientific position is that functional lab panels and commercial food sensitivity testing, particularly IgG-based tests, are not validated diagnostic tools for uncovering generalized hidden stressors affecting energy, digestion, mood, or vitality, and they are not recommended by major allergy and immunology societies or clinical practice guidelines for routine patient care. Standard practice is to assess digestive, fatigue, and mood symptoms using established clinical evaluation, focused laboratory tests when indicated, and evidence-based interventions (such as dietitian-guided elimination diets, management of IBS, mental health care, and treatment of specific diseases) rather than broad, non-validated functional testing. While elimination diets may be used in selected patients with suspected food-related IBS or true food allergy, they are typically guided by history, standard IgE-based testing or oral food challenges, and structured dietary protocols, not by wide food sensitivity panels marketed for general vitality or mood optimization.
Papers listed for this claim:[1][2][3][5][6][4][7][13][14][15][16][17]
“food sensitivity evaluations”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Allergies, asthma and food sensitivities
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to advertise Colic or excessive fussiness as within their scope of practice.
Colic or excessive fussiness
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Colic or excessive fussiness”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Infant colic and reflux
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to advertise Torticollis and head tilt as within their scope of practice.
Torticollis and head tilt
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Torticollis and head tilt”
Rule: K.S.A. §65-2871 (Kansas Healing Arts Act)
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Torticollis and infant development
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to advertise Recurring ear infections or sinus congestion as within their scope of practice.
Recurring ear infections or sinus congestion
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Recurring ear infections or sinus congestion”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Ear infections
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure Plagiocephaly (flat head).
Plagiocephaly (flat head)
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Plagiocephaly (flat head)”
Rule: K.S.A. §65-2871 (Kansas Healing Arts Act)
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Torticollis and infant development
Sarah Drake is not licensed or approved by Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) to diagnose, treat, or cure Frequent ear infections.
Frequent ear infections
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Frequent ear infections”
Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871
See every doc bro who says they can treat or advise on Ear infections
Manipulation
transcript · cited
This sells special testing as the way to find hidden causes of vague symptoms like fatigue, skin issues, and digestive distress. Food sensitivity panels are widely criticized for poor validity and for encouraging unnecessary restriction and follow-up purchases. Likely motive: Generate revenue from test fees and downstream treatment plans.
“Dr. Matt offers functional wellness testing — including food sensitivity evaluations”
transcript · cited
The copy stretches chiropractic biomechanics into broad claims about brain-body communication, neurological disorders, fatigue, migraines, vertigo, and post-concussion symptoms. That is a classic authority stretch: narrow spine care marketed like general neurology. Likely motive: Borrow medical seriousness to widen the market beyond musculoskeletal care.
“Upper Cervical Specific, one of the most precise and neurologically-focused techniques in chiropractic”
transcript · cited
Vague but alarming language suggests unseen internal problems are driving symptoms, priming the reader to seek testing and care. It implies you may have a latent medical issue without actually naming a diagnosis or offering evidence. Likely motive: Create anxiety so the audience pays for a consult and testing.
“hidden stressors that may be contributing to chronic inflammation, fatigue, skin issues, or digestive distress”
source material
The page is a direct conversion funnel: diagnose-sounding content, then a booking CTA, then a cash-pay/self-pay pitch and FSA/HSA payment suggestion. That is classic lead capture for a clinic visit. Likely motive: Convert viewers into appointments and long-term chiropractic patients.
“book your visit today”
Commerce & grift map
The funnel is familiar: vague symptom anxiety, then a functional lab test or food-sensitivity evaluation, then a customized care plan and repeat visits. This page also mixes ordinary chiropractic care with systemic-disease language, which makes the test-and-treat upsell look more medically sophisticated than the credential really supports.
drakechiroandrehab.com
Lab testing
Commerce link to third-party store without explicit affiliate parameters; compensation still possible via practitioner markup
Doc Bro outbound link (live) · Archive pending
Labs pitched
- Functional wellness testing
“Dr. Matt offers functional wellness testing — including food sensitivity evaluations”
- Food sensitivity evaluations
“functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations”
How the money flows
- Lab testing referralUndisclosed Clinic-linked lab testing page promotes functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations, likely producing revenue through testing fees, practitioner markup, or downstream service conversion. “Functional Lab Testing & Food Sensitivity Evaluations”
“Functional Lab Testing & Food Sensitivity Evaluations”
- Paid wellness plan / membershipUndisclosed The clinic promotes transparent self-pay and ongoing wellness care plans, which are direct-to-consumer revenue streams. “Many families choose to pay out-of-pocket to maintain full control over their wellness care. We'll work with you to find a plan that fits your needs and budget.”
“Many families choose to pay out-of-pocket to maintain full control over their wellness care. We'll work with you to find a plan that fits your needs and budget.”
Store links detected
- Functional Lab Testing & Food Sensitivity EvaluationsMedium likelihood
“Commerce link to third-party store without explicit affiliate parameters”
Sponsors and advertisers
Brands, advertisers, and agencies connected to this content, based on what it promotes and discloses.
- drakechiroandrehab.comBrand
Named on a surface without a compensation disclosure
- Functional wellness testingBrand
Named on a surface without a compensation disclosure
- Food sensitivity evaluationsBrand
Named on a surface without a compensation disclosure
Credentials & scope
Glossary: Chiropractor (“Dr.”)
Learn: Is a chiropractor a medical doctor?
Stated: DR, Chiropractor
Verified against the federal provider registry: DC · Chiropractor · KS license 01-05730.
Sarah Drake and Matt Drake appear to be licensed chiropractors using the doctor title from chiropractic credentials, not MD/DO licenses. The credibility problem is not the title itself; it is the leap from musculoskeletal care into functional lab diagnosis, food sensitivity interpretation, pediatric systemic complaints, migraines, vertigo, neurological disorders, and immune claims.
- D.C., Doctor of Chiropractic
A state-regulated chiropractic doctorate. It does not grant general medical licensure or the authority to practice internal medicine, endocrinology, pediatrics, or neurology as a physician.
Kansas chiropractic scope is typically limited to diagnosing and treating neuromusculoskeletal conditions with chiropractic methods; systemic disease management is outside typical scope.
- CACCP, Certification in Chiropractic Pediatrics
A postdoctoral specialty certificate showing additional chiropractic training around children. It is not a pediatric medical license and does not authorize diagnosis or treatment of systemic childhood disease.
Useful for pediatric chiropractic technique, but not a substitute for a pediatrician or specialist when a child has reflux, developmental delay, ear infections, or other medical conditions.
Permitted scope vs advertised
Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Chiropractic) · Confidence: high
Kansas chiropractors may examine, analyze, and diagnose the human body and its diseases using physical, thermal, or manual methods and X-ray analysis; adjust misplaced tissue; manipulate or treat the body by manual, mechanical, electrical, or natural methods; use physiotherapy (light, heat, water, exercise); and use foods, food concentrates, or food extracts. Chiropractors are expressly prohibited from prescribing or administering medicine or drugs, performing surgery, or practicing obstetrics.
What this license permits
- Spinal adjustment and manipulation
- Musculoskeletal evaluation and treatment
- Soft-tissue and rehabilitative care
- Headache care within musculoskeletal scope
17 of 21 advertised activities fall outside permitted scope.
| Advertised | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Listed service Dealing with inflammation or autoimmune tendencies Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating systemic autoimmune conditions and inflammation is diagnosis and treatment of disease beyond the scope of chiropractic manipulation and physiotherapy; it requires medical management and is not affirmatively authorized by Kansas statute. | Outside scope |
| Listed service On the autism spectrum Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Diagnosing or treating autism spectrum disorder is a neuropsychiatric diagnosis outside the scope of chiropractic practice; chiropractors are not authorized to diagnose developmental or psychiatric conditions. | Outside scope |
| Implying treatment for chronic fatigue and systemic inflammation Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating systemic inflammation and chronic fatigue syndrome as primary conditions is medical diagnosis and treatment of systemic disease, not affirmatively authorized chiropractic manipulation or physiotherapy. | Outside scope |
| functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations to help you uncover the hidden stressors that may be affecting your energy, digestion, mood, and overall vitality Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Functional lab testing and food sensitivity evaluations for systemic diagnosis of digestive, mood, and energy disorders are medical diagnostic services not affirmatively authorized for chiropractors under Kansas law. | Outside scope |
| Upper Cervical care can benefit those dealing with: Dizziness or vertigo, Migraines and chronic headaches, Post-concussion symptoms, Neurological disorders, Nervous system overload and fatigue Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating neurological disorders, post-concussion syndrome, and nervous system dysfunction as primary conditions is medical diagnosis and treatment beyond chiropractic scope; while upper cervical manipulation may be within scope, claiming benefit for neurological disorders and systemic fatigue exceeds the affirmative authorization. | Outside scope |
| Many parents see significant improvements in these common childhood concerns through gentle, neurologically-focused chiropractic care Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Advertising neurologically-focused chiropractic care for childhood concerns implies treatment of developmental and neurological conditions, which are medical diagnoses outside the scope of chiropractic practice. | Outside scope |
| We work with infants and children experiencing: Birth stress and difficult deliveries, Torticollis, Breastfeeding challenges and latch issues, Sleep disturbances and colic, Reflux, digestive discomfort, and gas, Ear infections and sinus pressure, Developmental delays or missed milestones, Behavioral changes or trouble focusing Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating birth trauma, breastfeeding dysfunction, reflux, ear infections, developmental delays, and behavioral disorders are medical diagnoses and treatments; while torticollis may have a musculoskeletal component, the overall claim encompasses systemic pediatric medical conditions outside chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Routine adjustments can: Improve posture and alignment, Enhance immune function, Boost focus and mental clarity, Reduce frequency of illness Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Claiming that routine adjustments enhance immune function, reduce illness frequency, and boost mental clarity implies treatment of systemic disease and neuropsychiatric conditions beyond the affirmative authorization for manipulation and physiotherapy. | Outside scope |
| Listed service functional lab testing Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Functional lab testing for systemic diagnosis is a medical diagnostic service not affirmatively authorized for chiropractors; the statute limits diagnosis to physical, thermal, or manual methods and X-ray analysis taught in accredited chiropractic schools. | Outside scope |
| Listed service food sensitivity evaluations Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Food sensitivity evaluations are medical diagnostic testing not affirmatively authorized for chiropractors; while chiropractors may use foods and food concentrates as treatment, diagnosing food sensitivities requires medical laboratory analysis outside chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Colic or excessive fussiness Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating colic and excessive fussiness in infants is a pediatric medical condition; while a musculoskeletal component may exist, advertising treatment of colic as a primary condition implies medical diagnosis and treatment outside chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Torticollis and head tilt A chiropractic license in Kansas covers the spine, joints and muscles. It does not cover diagnosing or treating torticollis and infant development. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Recurring ear infections or sinus congestion Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating recurring ear infections and sinus congestion as primary conditions is medical diagnosis and treatment of infectious or inflammatory disease, not affirmatively authorized chiropractic manipulation or physiotherapy. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Plagiocephaly (flat head) A chiropractic license in Kansas covers the spine, joints and muscles. It does not cover diagnosing or treating torticollis and infant development. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Frequent ear infections Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Treating frequent ear infections as a primary condition is medical diagnosis and treatment of infectious disease, not affirmatively authorized chiropractic manipulation or physiotherapy. | Outside scope |
| Upper Cervical Specific care for migraines, vertigo, neurological concerns, and fatigue Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Advertising upper cervical care specifically for neurological concerns, systemic fatigue, and migraines as primary conditions implies treatment of neurological and systemic disease beyond the affirmative authorization for manipulation of misplaced tissue. | Outside scope |
| Pediatric chiropractic for colic, reflux, ear infections, developmental delays Rule: K.S.A. 65-2871 Advertising pediatric chiropractic care for colic, reflux, ear infections, and developmental delays implies treatment of pediatric medical conditions (infectious, gastrointestinal, and developmental) outside the scope of chiropractic manipulation and physiotherapy. | Outside scope |
Sources: K.S.A. 65-2871 - Persons deemed engaged in practice of chiropractic (official), K.S.A. 65-2802 - Definitions (official), Kansas State Board of Healing Arts - Doctor of Chiropractic (official), Kansas Statutes (official)
Scope comparison mirror
Side-by-side view of the archived marketing homepage and what a Chiropractor scope permits near Basehor, KS. Open the mirror for the full comparison: archive on the left, permitted scope and licensed-care paths on the right.
Mirror generated 2026-10-21 12:19 UTC. The archive pane loads styles and images from the intake snapshot.
8 licensed-care paths linked for out-of-scope claims.
Disclaimer hypocrisy
Sarah Drake and Matt Drake toss in the usual liability shield about not treating conditions, then immediately hand out condition-level promises anyway. It is the classic doc-bro two-step: deny you are practicing medicine, while still telling people what their nervous system can fix.
Validated associated properties
Surfaces tied to this Doc Bro by domain, branding, or funnel routing. Third-party platforms are labeled as routes, not as owned properties.
Analyzed
- OwnedOfficial site (drakechiroandrehab.com)
Tip the jar
Report useful? Optional tips help keep scans, archives, and literature cross-checks running. They never change conclusions.
Submission AWsNPM73sLU9VStLaNFO8
Fight disinformation
Log a public thread where Sarah Drake is spreading nonsense, get a copy-paste reply with this report link.
Reply snippets
Before you buy the protocol: Dr. Trust Me Bro fact-checked Sarah Drake's claims with peer-reviewed sources, https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/AWsNPM73sLU9VStLaNFO8. White-coat charisma isn't evidence.
Full DTMB scan on Sarah Drake: https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/AWsNPM73sLU9VStLaNFO8
Drop these in YouTube comments, Reddit threads, and forums, link back to this scan, not vibes.
Recent mentions (this doc)
No conversation links logged yet. Be the first above.
Nudge the Doc Bro
We email a public contact address from their site so Sarah Drake can review this dossier and dispute anything we got wrong.
Know someone who can help?
If you think someone has firsthand information about Sarah Drake, send them an encouraging note. We email a short, respectful message with this report and clear instructions on how to write in, on the record or anonymously.
Whambulance
Challenge this scan or Wall of Fame entry for Sarah Drake. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Public challenge log
No posted Wall of Fame challenges linked yet.
Challenges are public on the Wall of Fame card. DTMB does not remove entries for hurt feelings, primary sources or copy corrections only.
File a challenge
Include in your email:
- Doc Bro ID: YsX7Yb9tFyceZp7ZJBn1w
- Wall entry: /influencer/YsX7Yb9tFyceZp7ZJBn1w
- Analysis ID: AWsNPM73sLU9VStLaNFO8
- Source: http://www.drakechiroandrehab.com/
- Why this entry or scan should change
- Supporting links (one per line)
- Your business email (for verified disputes)
Verified challenges are posted publicly on the report. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Citations
Peer-reviewed and index sources cited in this report.
- [1] Guideline-Driven Management of Hypertension: An Evidence-Based Update.
- [2] ASPEN-FELANPE Clinical Guidelines.
- [3] ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease.
- [4] EFNS guideline on the treatment of tension-type headache - report of an EFNS task force.
- [5] When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?
- [6] GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision.
- [7] Blood Transfusion Therapy.
- [8] Colchicine in Pericarditis.
- [9] Vertebral Subluxation and Systems Biology: An Integrative Review ...
- [10] Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for acute neck pain: A 4-arm clinical placebo randomized controlled trial. A prospective study protocol
- [11] The effects of 12 weeks of chiropractic spinal adjustments on physiological biomarkers in adults: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial
- [12] Microsoft Word - Immunity- Chiropractic Review and Theory.docx
- [13] Limits of meta-analysis: methylphenidate in the treatment of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
- [14] Food elimination based on IgG antibodies in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
- [15] Symptom pattern following a meal challenge test in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and healthy controls
- [16] Functional bowel symptoms, fibromyalgia and fatigue: A food-induced triad?
- [17] Food Allergy and Intolerance in IBS.
- [18] Effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation for upper quadrant musculoskeletal disorders: protocol for a systematic review
- [19] Atlas Subluxation Complex, National Upper Cervical Chiropractic ... - PMC
- [20] IMPROVEMENT OF DIZZINESS FOLLOWING AN UPPER ...
- [21] Is manual therapy effective for cervical dizziness? A systematic ...
- [22] Assessing the evidence for the use of chiropractic manipulation in ...
- [23] Randomised controlled trial of infantile colic treated with ...
- [24] Chiropractic Care in Children: A Review of Evidence and Safety - PMC
- [25] Otitis media and spinal manipulative therapy: a literature review
- [26] Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults: Réseau canadien pour les traitements de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (CANMAT) 2023 : Mise à jour des lignes directrices cliniques pour la prise en charge du trouble dépressif majeur chez les adultes.
- [27] The chiropractic care of infants with colic: a systematic ...
- [28] Chiropractic spinal manipulation for infant colic
- [29] The Chiropractic Care of Infants with Colic: A Systematic ...
- [30] Evidence Based Chiropractic: Pediatrics - LibGuides at Logan
- [31] The Effects Induced by Spinal Manipulative Therapy on ... - PMC
- [32] Assessment of Studies Evaluating Spinal Manipulative ...
- [33] Immediate systemic neuroimmune responses following spinal mobilisation and manipulation in people with non-specific neck pain: a randomised placebo-controlled trial - Scientific Reports
- [34] A united statement of the global chiropractic research ... - PMC