Jaban M Moore alias The Toxicity Chiropractor
moving supplement units at Redefining Wellness Center
Website · redefiningwellnesscenter.com
Practice location
420 ARMOUR RD
NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO 64116
Funnel-first framing that runs on persuasion, light on published evidence.
- Of 16 health claims, 12 run counter to or conflict with the published evidence, and 1 was not independently checked.
- Primary persuasion tactic: The chiropractor as whole-body disease detective.
- Stated credentials look inflated relative to the advice given.
- Gives advice beyond what their license covers.
Jaban Moore has built a wellness center where a chiropractic credential takes a scenic detour through toxic overload, leaky gut, emotional residue, and a bubbling foot bath. The symptom checklist opens the door, the branded detox gadget gets the spotlight, and ordinary uncertainty is invited to pay admission.
High grift signals
Score breakdown
Direct answer
Jaban M Moore is licensed in Missouri as a chiropractor (DC), not as an MD or DO, and Missouri's chiropractic scope statute (RSMo § 331.010) limits that license to musculoskeletal care, not the diagnosis or treatment of systemic disease. Even so, they advertise diagnosing or treating Leaky gut, Metabolic dysfunction, Chemical toxicities, Poor digestion, and Plantar fasciitis, conditions that belong with gastroenterologists.
Key findings
- False Authority: This language presents a chiropractic clinic as able to investigate broad internal disease causes, although chiropractic licensure is generally centered on musculoskeletal and nervous-system care rather than general internal medicine.see section ↓
- Claim "The clinic claims to address underlying causes of disease through a whole-person approach…": not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.see section ↓
- Claim "Neuro Emotional Technique is claimed to identify and release stuck mind-body stress patte…": not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.see section ↓
- NPI registry confirms Jaban Moore as Chiropractor (DC) in Missouri (NPI 1073958815).see section ↓
- Jaban M Moore shows credential inflation relative to stated vs likely credentials.see section ↓
- Dr Jaban M Moore is marketed with a doctor title, but reviewed credentials indicate Chiropractor (DC) rather than an MD/DO physician license.see section ↓
- Against Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners scope rules (RSMo § 331.010), these advertised activities appear outside Jaban M Moore's license (including conditions they merely list as ones they treat): Leaky gut, The clinic uses an ionic foot bath to detoxify the body and move toxins…see section ↓
- 16 of 22 advertised activities fall outside permitted Chiropractor scope in MO.see section ↓
Claims & evidence
14 advertised conditions or treatments fall outside their license scope. Each box leads with state-board scope notation; literature cross-check follows when we matched a specific claim. Every card carries its receipts: the quoted wording, a live source link, and an archived copy.
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Leaky gut.
Leaky gut
- Supports
- No direct high-quality evidence supports DC treatment for leaky gut or objectively measured intestinal permeability. A narrative review describes limited studies of chiropractic therapy for gastrointestinal disorders, but does not establish efficacy for leaky gut or intestinal permeability. [2][3][4][5] The listed index papers are unrelated to chiropractic treatment or intestinal permeability and provide no support for this claim. [1]
- Contradicts
- A systematic review found only two controlled clinical trials of chiropractic treatment for gastrointestinal problems, both with serious methodological flaws, and concluded that there is no supportive evidence that chiropractic is effective for gastrointestinal disorders. [2][3][4] Reviews of leaky gut emphasize that it is not a formally accepted diagnosis, lacks a validated routine diagnostic test, and has no established chiropractic treatment. [5] Evidence that intestinal permeability can change with diet, underlying disease treatment, or other experimental interventions does not demonstrate that spinal manipulation or DC treatment repairs it. Chiropractic studies involving gastrointestinal symptoms, such as preliminary dyspepsia or reflux studies, do not establish benefit for leaky gut or intestinal permeability.
- Mainstream view
- Chiropractic manipulation is not an evidence-based treatment for leaky gut. [2][3][4][5] Clinicians should first establish whether a patient has a recognized gastrointestinal disease and manage that condition using evidence-based care; the term leaky gut syndrome should not be treated as a validated diagnosis without objective assessment. [1] Claims that a chiropractor can repair intestinal permeability or treat systemic disease through spinal manipulation are unsupported.
“Leaky Gut”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise The clinic uses an ionic foot bath to detoxify the body and move toxins into the lymphatic system. as within their scope of practice.
The clinic uses an ionic foot bath to detoxify the body and move toxins into the lymphatic system.
- Supports
- No high-quality evidence supports the claim that an ionic foot bath detoxifies the body or moves toxins into the lymphatic system. [6][7][8][9][10] Warm footbaths may have effects such as improved subjective sleep or relaxation, but these findings do not establish detoxification or lymphatic toxin transport. The cited lymphatic-system paper concerns mobility and the foot-and-calf pump, not ionic foot baths or toxin removal .
- Contradicts
- A peer-reviewed study of the IonCleanse device found no evidence that it caused elimination of potentially toxic elements through the feet, urine, or hair after four sessions . [6][7][8][9][11] The same study reported that changes in bath water could reflect environmental contamination or electrode-related processes rather than toxins leaving the body . [10] The proposed mechanism of drawing toxins through the soles and into the lymphatic system lacks demonstrated physiological or clinical evidence. The other listed index papers address unrelated topics and do not support this claim.
- Mainstream view
- Mainstream medical evidence does not recognize ionic foot baths as a detoxification treatment or as a method for moving toxins into the lymphatic system. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Toxin handling is primarily governed by organs and processes such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and, for some substances, medically established chelation or other targeted treatments. Ionic foot baths may provide a warm-water or relaxation experience, but claims of systemic detoxification and lymphatic toxin transfer should not be presented as clinically established.
“The MaX Detox Foot Bath System is one of the safest detoxification processes”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise The clinic claims to address underlying causes of disease through a whole-person approach, implying broad disease evaluation beyond musculoskeletal care. as within their scope of practice.
The clinic claims to address underlying causes of disease through a whole-person approach, implying broad disease evaluation beyond musculoskeletal care.
- Supports
- Whole-person care is a recognized model that may consider physical, psychological, social, and lifestyle factors, and systematic reviews describe potential benefits for patient experience and some clinical outcomes, although definitions and models are heterogeneous. [16][17][18][19] The rheumatoid arthritis trial evaluated nurse-led, person-centred care within disease-management services, supporting person-centred management in a defined condition rather than broad evaluation of all diseases . The Lancet report emphasizes the importance of addressing broad determinants of health at a population level, not validating any particular clinic's diagnostic scope . [15]
- Contradicts
- The cited papers do not establish that this clinic evaluates underlying causes of disease broadly or competently beyond musculoskeletal care. [19] A systematic review found that whole-person assessment approaches were not yet sufficient for broad implementation in family medicine . [16][18] A systematic review of integrative healthcare for chronic disease found only eight eligible studies, all with uncertain or high risk of bias, with varied and inconsistent outcomes, preventing firm conclusions about effectiveness . [17] The remaining indexed papers concern specific topics such as Parkinson disease, Meniere disease, appendicitis, periodontitis, or unrelated publication decisions and do not validate a clinic-wide claim of broad disease evaluation.
- Mainstream view
- Whole-person care can appropriately include attention to medical, psychological, social, behavioral, and lifestyle factors, but claims to identify or treat underlying causes require condition-specific evidence, qualified clinicians, appropriate diagnostic testing, and coordination with conventional medical services. [16][18] A clinic's use of whole-person language does not by itself demonstrate broad disease evaluation or care beyond musculoskeletal practice.
“Addressing the underlying causes of disease by addressing the whole person, not just and isolated set of symptoms.”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Metabolic dysfunction.
Metabolic dysfunction
- Supports
- No high-quality direct evidence supports chiropractor (DC) treatment as a treatment for metabolic dysfunction. [22][27] A chiropractic review discusses lifestyle counseling, dietary modification, and nutritional support that may be undertaken in practice, but it does not establish that spinal manipulation treats metabolic dysfunction. [20][21][24][28][29][30] A single case report suggesting improved glycemic measures after a specialized chiropractic protocol is very low-quality evidence and cannot establish efficacy.
- Contradicts
- A systematic review of chiropractic treatment for primary or early secondary prevention found no effect in the clinical studies that could be synthesized and concluded that evidence does not support chiropractic treatment for prevention of disease in general. [21][22][28][29][30] The available index papers primarily concern low-back pain, adverse events, urologic or musculoskeletal conditions, somatosensory activation, or lymphatic procedures, not metabolic dysfunction; therefore they provide no direct support for this claim. [27] Spinal manipulative therapy has evidence for modest benefits in chronic low-back pain, but that does not demonstrate metabolic effects. [20][23][24][26][31] Evidence regarding endocrine or immune biomarkers is preliminary, and clinical relevance is unknown.
- Mainstream view
- Metabolic dysfunction, including metabolic syndrome, obesity, prediabetes, and diabetes, should be managed with evidence-based lifestyle interventions, risk-factor control, and indicated medical treatment. [23][27][30] Chiropractors may support general health through screening, exercise advice, nutrition counseling, or co-management, but spinal manipulation or DC treatment is not an established treatment for metabolic dysfunction and should not replace standard medical care. [20][21][22][24][26][28][29]
“Metabolic Dysfunction”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Chemical toxicities.
Chemical toxicities
- Supports
- The indexed chiropractor-focused paper discusses toxicity and endotoxemia as concepts relevant to chiropractic research, and proposes dietary reduction of low-grade endotoxemia; it does not establish that chiropractic treatment treats chemical poisoning or systemic chemical toxicities. [32][33][36][38] Standard toxicology literature supports assessment, stabilization, supportive care, decontamination, specific antidotes, and selected toxin-elimination procedures for poisoning, but not chiropractic treatment. [37][39]
- Contradicts
- No indexed clinical trial, systematic review, or guideline demonstrates that chiropractic manipulation or other chiropractor-delivered treatment treats chemical toxicities. [39] The chiropractor-focused paper is a historical and clinical perspective rather than evidence of efficacy for poisoning treatment. [32][33][36] Toxicology guidance instead describes management according to the specific toxin, including airway and circulatory support, observation, decontamination, antidotes, and enhanced elimination when indicated; chiropractic treatment is not included. [38] Chemical poisoning can be life-threatening, so substituting chiropractic care for urgent medical or poison-center assessment could delay effective treatment. [37]
- Mainstream view
- Chemical toxicity or poisoning should be evaluated and managed by emergency clinicians, medical toxicologists, and poison-control services using exposure-specific supportive care, decontamination, antidotes, and elimination techniques when appropriate. [33][36][37][38][39] Chiropractic care has no established role in reversing or treating chemical toxicities.
“Chemical Toxicities”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Poor digestion.
Poor digestion
- Supports
- A small pilot study of chiropractic manual intervention in chronic adult dyspepsia has been reported, but it does not establish effectiveness. Self-reported improvements in nonmusculoskeletal symptoms after chiropractic care have been described in surveys, but these uncontrolled reports cannot demonstrate that treatment caused improvement . [40][42][43][46][3][4] A survey found that chiropractic websites commonly make claims for nonmusculoskeletal conditions, including digestive problems, but this documents promotion rather than efficacy . [41][2]
- Contradicts
- A systematic review of controlled clinical trials found only two eligible trials of chiropractic treatment for gastrointestinal problems, both with serious methodological flaws, and concluded that there was no supportive evidence of effectiveness. [45][3][2][4][29] Higher-quality evidence for spinal manipulation in nonmusculoskeletal disorders generally has found no benefit over sham treatment, while evidence for digestive disorders specifically remains absent or very low quality. [44] Self-reported symptom improvements after chiropractic treatment are vulnerable to placebo effects, regression to the mean, reporting bias, and concurrent care; the survey of reported nonmusculoskeletal responses does not provide controlled evidence . [40][42][43][46] The listed studies on improved nonmusculoskeletal symptoms are observational or self-reported and do not establish treatment efficacy . The hypothesized IGF-1 mechanism is not clinical evidence that chiropractic treatment improves digestion .
- Mainstream view
- Chiropractic treatment is not an evidence-based treatment for poor digestion, dyspepsia, reflux, constipation, or unspecified gastrointestinal symptoms. [3][2][4] Digestive complaints should be assessed using standard medical evaluation because they may reflect conditions requiring targeted dietary, pharmacologic, diagnostic, or other treatment. Spinal manipulation may have a role for some musculoskeletal pain conditions, but it should not be promoted as a treatment for digestive function, and any use for gastrointestinal symptoms should be considered unproven adjunctive care rather than a replacement for conventional evaluation or treatment. [41][42][43][44][29]
“Poor Digestion”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Neuro Emotional Technique is claimed to identify and release stuck mind-body stress patterns that contribute to chronic physical problems. as within their scope of practice.
Neuro Emotional Technique is claimed to identify and release stuck mind-body stress patterns that contribute to chronic physical problems.
- Supports
- NET studies report changes in distress, anxiety, traumatic-stress symptoms, and activity in brain regions involved in emotional processing after treatment, but these are preliminary findings rather than definitive evidence that NET identifies or releases a specific causal mind-body pattern. [47][49][50][51][54] A randomized trial found improvements in flexibility using a NET-based mind-body intervention, but this does not establish that NET detects or releases stuck patterns underlying chronic physical disease. A small controlled study reported reduced trigger-point sensitivity and pain in people with chronic neck pain after NET compared with a sham protocol, providing limited direct evidence for symptom improvement in one musculoskeletal condition. [52][53][55]
- Contradicts
- The cited interoception and amygdala papers describe legitimate relationships between bodily signals, emotion, and brain processing, but they do not validate NET as a diagnostic or therapeutic method for identifying and releasing stuck stress patterns. [47][48][50][51][53][54][55] The NET clinical literature is small, condition-specific, and includes preliminary or limited trials; it does not demonstrate that chronic physical problems are caused by NET-defined patterns, nor that releasing such patterns treats chronic disease. A case report of NET-associated changes in stress and glucose cannot establish efficacy or causation. Evidence for broader emotion-focused or pain-neuroscience interventions cannot be assumed to apply to NET.
- Mainstream view
- Stress, emotion regulation, interoception, and chronic pain can interact through recognized biopsychosocial mechanisms, and psychological or mind-body interventions may help some patients with symptoms such as chronic pain. [47][51][52] However, mainstream medicine does not recognize NET as a validated method for diagnosing or releasing hidden mind-body stress patterns, and there is insufficient high-quality direct evidence that it improves chronic physical problems through the claimed mechanism. [50][53][54][55] NET should not replace assessment or evidence-based treatment for persistent physical symptoms.
“We use an approach called Neuro Emotional Technique (NET) to identify, and help you let go of “stuck” mind-body stress patterns.”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not approved to offer Acupuncture is listed as treating physical, mental, and emotional conditions. within a Chiropractor scope of practice under Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners.
Acupuncture is listed as treating physical, mental, and emotional conditions.
- Supports
- Acupuncture is used or studied for a range of physical symptoms and conditions, particularly some chronic pain disorders, migraine, tension-type headache, and nausea, with evidence varying by condition. [56][58][59][61] It may also have effects on some associated psychological symptoms, but this does not establish treatment of mental or emotional conditions broadly. The listed index papers do not directly evaluate acupuncture or support this claim.
- Contradicts
- The wording is overly broad: evidence is condition-specific, and many acupuncture indications have insufficient, low-quality, or inconclusive evidence. [58][61] A large review found positive evidence for only a limited set of conditions, with insufficient evidence for many others. [59] Evidence for acupuncture as a treatment for mental or emotional disorders is not established broadly by high-quality direct evidence; studies of depression or mood symptoms are limited and heterogeneous. The supplied index papers concern aphasia therapy, trial randomization, diabetes monitoring, exercise, angioplasty, education, heart failure devices, and mHealth, not acupuncture, so none directly supports the claim. [56]
- Mainstream view
- Mainstream medical guidance recognizes acupuncture as a possible complementary option for selected symptoms, especially certain pain conditions and nausea, but not as a generally established treatment for all physical, mental, and emotional conditions. [56][58][59][61] It should not replace evidence-based diagnosis or treatment, and claims should be judged separately for each condition and outcome.
“It is used to alleviate pain and to treat various physical, mental, & emotional conditions.”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010(2)
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Plantar fasciitis.
Plantar fasciitis
- Supports
- Manual therapy, including foot and ankle mobilization and soft-tissue techniques, may improve short-term pain and function in plantar fasciitis. [64][65] A systematic review of seven randomized controlled trials found improved function with manual therapy, although pain advantages were inconsistent. [62] A randomized trial comparing chiropractic manipulation plus Achilles stretching with orthotics reported short-term pain improvement favoring chiropractic treatment, but this was a small study and does not establish broad effectiveness of chiropractic care. [63]
- Contradicts
- The provided index results do not directly study chiropractic treatment of plantar fasciitis and therefore provide no relevant support. [62][63][65] A newer systematic review found that manual-therapy evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and methodologically weak, with controversial effects on pain and function. [64] Evidence for generic chiropractor treatment specifically is weaker than evidence for selected physical-therapy manual techniques, and there is insufficient evidence for durable benefit, superiority over standard care, or benefit from spinal manipulation unrelated to the foot and ankle.
- Mainstream view
- Plantar fasciitis is usually managed initially with education, activity modification, plantar-fascia and calf stretching, strengthening, and supportive footwear or orthoses; selected physical therapies may be added. [62][63][65] Foot and ankle manual therapy can be considered as an adjunct for short-term symptom relief, but chiropractic treatment as a broad category is not established as a definitive or superior treatment. [64] The claim is too nonspecific to determine which chiropractic technique, treatment schedule, comparator, or outcome is intended.
“Plantar Fasciitis”
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Scoliosis.
Scoliosis
- Supports
- The listed biomechanics paper provides a rationale for considering manipulation, but rationale is not clinical evidence of effectiveness. [66][72][75] A small pilot randomized study and low-quality observational or case-series reports have described possible changes in Cobb angle, pain, or function, but they were not sufficient to establish efficacy.
- Contradicts
- The systematic review of chiropractic treatment found no high-quality randomized trials and concluded that available evidence does not show that spinal manipulation influences progression of adolescent scoliosis. [67][68][70][72][74][77] A systematic review of manual therapy found only three relevant studies, none meeting all inclusion criteria, and concluded that the evidence was insufficient to determine efficacy. The later systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials judged the evidence very low quality and concluded that there is currently no evidence supporting spinal manipulation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. [73][75][76] The pediatric consult paper is relevant to the need for appropriate orthopedic evaluation rather than evidence that chiropractic treatment corrects scoliosis. [71] The indexed paper on chiropractic manipulation and home exercise concerns older adults with back-related disability, not scoliosis treatment, so it cannot establish effectiveness for scoliosis. [66][69] Evidence for acupuncture and cupping is not evidence for chiropractor treatment.
- Mainstream view
- Chiropractic manipulation is not an established treatment for correcting scoliosis, stopping curve progression, or replacing evidence-based management. [66][67][70][73][74][75][76][77] Patients should receive diagnosis and monitoring appropriate to scoliosis type and severity; management may include observation, scoliosis-specific exercises, bracing, or surgery when indicated. Chiropractic care might be considered only as an adjunct for selected symptoms, such as nonspecific pain, without claiming correction of the spinal curve or prevention of progression. [71][72]
“Scoliosis”
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Carpal tunnel syndrome.
Carpal tunnel syndrome
- Supports
- A randomized trial directly evaluating chiropractic care found that chiropractic treatment combined upper-extremity and spinal manipulation, soft-tissue treatment, ultrasound, and wrist supports, and produced improvements comparable to conservative medical care over nine weeks; however, it did not establish superiority of chiropractic care. [80][81][82][86] Systematic reviews and randomized trials of manual therapy, including mobilization and neurodynamic techniques, report short-term improvements in pain, symptoms, function, and sometimes nerve-conduction measures in mainly mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. [79][23][83][84][85][87][88] These findings support manual therapy as a possible conservative or adjunctive treatment, but they do not specifically validate all treatments delivered by chiropractors.
- Contradicts
- The index papers supplied do not directly study chiropractor treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome; most are unrelated to this condition or concern general manual therapy rather than chiropractic care. [79][80][23][82][83][84][85][86][87][88] The directly relevant chiropractic trial was small, used a multimodal package rather than spinal manipulation alone, and found no significant difference from medical treatment. [81] A Cochrane review concluded that evidence for exercise and mobilization interventions was limited and very low quality, which weakens confidence in durable or clinically important benefit. The available evidence does not show that chiropractic treatment decompresses the median nerve, cures carpal tunnel syndrome, prevents progression, or is superior to established options such as splinting, corticosteroid injection, or surgery.
- Mainstream view
- Carpal tunnel syndrome is usually managed initially with activity modification, a neutral wrist splint, and selected rehabilitation or manual-therapy approaches for mild or moderate disease. [79][80][23][83][84][85][86][87][88] Manual therapy may provide short-term symptomatic benefit, but evidence is heterogeneous and generally does not establish chiropractor-delivered treatment as a distinct or superior therapy. [81] Persistent, severe, or electrodiagnostically advanced disease warrants medical evaluation; corticosteroid injection or carpal tunnel release may be considered according to severity and response. Chiropractic treatment should not replace diagnostic assessment or proven treatments.
“carpal tunnel syndrome”
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to diagnose, treat, or cure Services.
Services
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Services”
Rule: Mo. Rev. Stat. §331.010 (20 CSR 2070)
Jaban M Moore is not licensed or approved by Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to advertise Broadly claiming to address underlying causes of disease and metabolic dysfunction moves beyond ordinary spine and musculoskeletal chiropractic care. as within their scope of practice.
Broadly claiming to address underlying causes of disease and metabolic dysfunction moves beyond ordinary spine and musculoskeletal chiropractic care.
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Metabolic Dysfunction”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Jaban M Moore is not approved to offer Presenting chemical toxicities and detoxification as a clinic target implies systemic disease assessment and treatment outside typical chiropractic-board scope. within a Chiropractor scope of practice under Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners.
Presenting chemical toxicities and detoxification as a clinic target implies systemic disease assessment and treatment outside typical chiropractic-board scope.
No specific health claims of theirs were cross-checked against the literature.
“Chemical Toxicities”
Rule: RSMo § 331.010
Manipulation
transcript · cited
This language presents a chiropractic clinic as able to investigate broad internal disease causes, although chiropractic licensure is generally centered on musculoskeletal and nervous-system care rather than general internal medicine. Likely motive: Expand perceived authority and convert visitors with systemic symptoms into chiropractic services.
“Addressing the underlying causes of disease by addressing the whole person”

transcript · cited
The statement treats vague toxic overload as nearly universal and frames ordinary symptoms as evidence of contamination without identifying a validated diagnostic process or specific exposure. Likely motive: Create anxiety that makes detox products and visits feel necessary.
“it is not a question of IF our bodies are burdened with toxic overload, but more “how bad is it.””
transcript · cited
Calling NET proven does not establish that it can identify or release stored emotional patterns or treat chronic physical disease; the wording substitutes a broad scientific-sounding assertion for condition-specific evidence. Likely motive: Make a niche technique appear clinically validated and justify paid treatment.
“NET is based on a proven combination of the latest scientific research and centuries-old techniques used in Eastern medicine.”
transcript · cited
A named commercial device is used to support a detoxification narrative. Reliable evidence does not show ionic foot baths remove systemic toxins through the feet or lymphatic system. Likely motive: Sell or monetize sessions, device use, or related detox services.
“The MaX Detox Foot Bath System”
transcript · cited
A very broad list, including metabolic dysfunction, chemical toxicities, poor digestion, and leaky gut, funnels people with nonspecific symptoms toward the clinic without a clear diagnostic boundary. Likely motive: Maximize lead capture and appointments.
“If you said yes to any of these questions, our clinic is right for you!”
Commerce & grift map
The visible funnel is symptom anxiety leading to a broad chiropractic evaluation and paid modalities, especially detox foot-bath and NET services; no supplement-plus-lab upsell is visible here. Because no commerce links or compensation disclosures were supplied, a specific commission or referral-fee flow cannot be confirmed.
No FTC-style compensation disclosure
compensationDisclosures · scan
Credentials & scope
Glossary: Chiropractor (“Dr.”)
Learn: Is a chiropractor a medical doctor?
Stated: none · Likely: Chiropractor
Verified against the federal provider registry: D.C. · Chiropractor · MO license 2013013283.
Jaban Moore presents as a chiropractor, a real state-regulated credential with a narrower musculoskeletal and nervous-system scope. The site nevertheless markets broad disease-cause assessment and systemic detoxification concepts, creating credential inflation through specialty overreach.
- DC, Doctor of Chiropractic
A professional chiropractic degree and license qualifying the holder to practice chiropractic within state law; it is not an MD or DO medical degree.
A state chiropractic board typically permits evaluation and treatment of musculoskeletal and related nervous-system conditions using authorized chiropractic methods, but not general internal-medicine disease management, prescription pharmacology, or broad claims to diagnose and treat systemic disease.
Permitted scope vs advertised
Missouri State Board of Chiropractic Examiners · Confidence: high
Missouri defines chiropractic as examination, diagnosis, adjustment, manipulation, and treatment by methods commonly taught in an accredited chiropractic program or approved by the board. The scope excludes operative surgery, obstetrics, osteopathy, podiatry, drugs or medicine, and the practice of medicine; meridian therapy, acupressure, and acupuncture may be included when board certification requirements are met.
What this license permits
- Spinal adjustment and manipulation
- Musculoskeletal evaluation and treatment
- Soft-tissue and rehabilitative care
- Headache care within musculoskeletal scope
20 of 22 advertised activities fall outside permitted scope.
| Advertised | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Listed service Leaky gut Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Advertising leaky gut as a diagnosis concerns a systemic gastrointestinal condition rather than a chiropractic examination, diagnosis, or treatment authorized by § 331.010. | Outside scope |
| The clinic uses an ionic foot bath to detoxify the body and move toxins into the lymphatic system. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 A body-wide detoxification and lymphatic-toxin treatment is not affirmatively authorized as chiropractic treatment and is a systemic medical claim. | Outside scope |
| Ionic foot-bath bubbles are claimed to penetrate the feet and enter the lymphatic system. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 The claim presents an ionic foot bath as a systemic lymphatic treatment, not as an authorized chiropractic adjustment, manipulation, or commonly taught chiropractic method. | Outside scope |
| The clinic claims to address underlying causes of disease through a whole-person approach, implying broad disease evaluation beyond musculoskeletal care. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Broad evaluation and treatment of underlying disease causes exceeds the statute's affirmative authorization for chiropractic practice and implicates the excluded practice of medicine. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Metabolic dysfunction Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Metabolic dysfunction is a systemic disease-related diagnosis and is not affirmatively authorized as chiropractic practice under § 331.010. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Chemical toxicities Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Chemical toxicities imply systemic toxicological assessment outside the statute's defined chiropractic examination and diagnosis. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Poor digestion Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Poor digestion is a gastrointestinal symptom or condition and is not affirmatively authorized as chiropractic diagnosis under § 331.010. | Outside scope |
| Neuro Emotional Technique is claimed to identify and release stuck mind-body stress patterns that contribute to chronic physical problems. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Using NET to identify and release emotional patterns alleged to cause chronic physical problems is a broad mental and systemic disease-treatment claim rather than an expressly authorized chiropractic method. | Outside scope |
| Acupuncture is listed as treating physical, mental, and emotional conditions. Rule: RSMo § 331.010(2) Missouri affirmatively permits acupuncture only as part of chiropractic practice with board-required certification, but the advertised treatment of broad mental and emotional conditions exceeds that limited chiropractic authorization. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Plantar fasciitis Not listed among permitted DC scope activities under the governing practice act. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Scoliosis Not listed among permitted DC scope activities under the governing practice act. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Carpal tunnel syndrome Not listed among permitted DC scope activities under the governing practice act. | Outside scope |
| Listed service Services Rule: Mo. Rev. Stat. §331.010 (20 CSR 2070) Not listed among permitted DC scope activities under the governing practice act. | Outside scope |
| Broadly claiming to address underlying causes of disease and metabolic dysfunction moves beyond ordinary spine and musculoskeletal chiropractic care. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 The described claim involves systemic disease assessment and treatment rather than the chiropractic examination, diagnosis, and treatment methods authorized by § 331.010. | Outside scope |
| Presenting chemical toxicities and detoxification as a clinic target implies systemic disease assessment and treatment outside typical chiropractic-board scope. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Systemic toxicity assessment and detoxification are not affirmatively authorized chiropractic activities and fall outside the defined chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Marketing an ionic foot bath as a detoxification treatment for body-wide toxicity is a systemic treatment claim rather than musculoskeletal chiropractic care. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 A body-wide toxicity treatment claim is systemic medical treatment, not an authorized chiropractic adjustment, manipulation, or qualifying chiropractic method. | Outside scope |
| Claiming that NET addresses chronic physical problems through stored emotional responses is a broad mind-body disease-treatment claim. Rule: RSMo § 331.010 The claim represents emotional responses as causes of chronic physical disease and offers treatment beyond Missouri's affirmative chiropractic authorization. | Outside scope |
| Ionic detox foot bath Rule: RSMo § 331.010 An ionic detox foot bath marketed for systemic detoxification is not affirmatively authorized as chiropractic treatment under § 331.010. | Outside scope |
| Neuro Emotional Technique for chronic physical problems Rule: RSMo § 331.010 NET marketed for chronic physical problems through emotional mechanisms is a broad mind-body treatment claim outside the defined chiropractic scope. | Outside scope |
| Broad whole-person underlying-cause disease assessment Rule: RSMo § 331.010 Whole-person assessment of underlying disease causes is systemic medical diagnosis rather than the limited chiropractic examination and diagnosis authorized by § 331.010. | Outside scope |
Sources: Missouri Board of Chiropractic Examiners — Statutes (official), RSMo § 331.010 — Practice of chiropractic, definition (official), RSMo § 331.110 — Patient records and diagnosis authorized by § 331.010 (official), Missouri Secretary of State — Code of State Regulations, Title 20 (official)
Scope comparison mirror
Side-by-side view of the archived marketing homepage and what a Chiropractor scope permits near NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO. Open the mirror for the full comparison: archive on the left, permitted scope and licensed-care paths on the right.
Mirror generated 2026-08-26 17:13 UTC. The archive pane loads styles and images from the intake snapshot.
6 licensed-care paths linked for out-of-scope claims.
Validated associated properties
Surfaces tied to this Doc Bro by domain, branding, or funnel routing. Third-party platforms are labeled as routes, not as owned properties.
Analyzed
- OwnedOfficial site (drjabanmoore.com)
- OwnedJaban M Moore clinic / principal site (synergizedsupps.com)
- Operated funnelPractice site (redefiningwellnesscenter.com)
- Linked entityLinked commerce or practice (m.drjaban.com)
Funnel routes (third-party)
- Hosted routeFunnel route on myshopify.com
- Hosted routeFunnel route on amazon.com
Tip the jar
Report useful? Optional tips help keep scans, archives, and literature cross-checks running. They never change conclusions.
Submission GzVv2KciFGilz4At1AjQF
Fight disinformation
Log a public thread where Jaban M Moore is spreading nonsense, get a copy-paste reply with this report link.
Reply snippets
Before you buy the protocol: Dr. Trust Me Bro fact-checked Jaban M Moore's claims with peer-reviewed sources, https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/GzVv2KciFGilz4At1AjQF. White-coat charisma isn't evidence.
Full DTMB scan on Jaban M Moore: https://drtrustmebro.com/analyze/GzVv2KciFGilz4At1AjQF
Drop these in YouTube comments, Reddit threads, and forums, link back to this scan, not vibes.
Recent mentions (this doc)
- Other
Catching the Red Flags, with Michael Rubino
Interview page that features his mold and toxin claims.
- YouTube
Stop Masking Symptoms and Get to the Root Cause of Your Illness
Interview appearance with an open comment thread.
- Other
Episode 52: The Dangers of Chemical Toxicities with Jaban Moore
Podcast interview page where the pitch reaches a new audience.
- YouTube
Nervous System Dysregulation: The Invisible Barrier to Recovery
One of Jaban M Moore's own recent posts. The comment thread is where this pitch spreads, reply there with the report link.
- YouTube
How Dr. Jill Carnahan Uses Peptides for Mold, MCAS, and Chronic Illness
One of Jaban M Moore's own recent posts. The comment thread is where this pitch spreads, reply there with the report link.
Nudge the Doc Bro
We email a public contact address from their site so Jaban M Moore can review this dossier and dispute anything we got wrong.
Know someone who can help?
If you think someone has firsthand information about Jaban M Moore, send them an encouraging note. We email a short, respectful message with this report and clear instructions on how to write in, on the record or anonymously.
Whambulance
Challenge this scan or Wall of Fame entry for Jaban M Moore. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Public challenge log
No posted Wall of Fame challenges linked yet.
Challenges are public on the Wall of Fame card. DTMB does not remove entries for hurt feelings, primary sources or copy corrections only.
File a challenge
Include in your email:
- Doc Bro ID: LHGCVS_CZpjf-As5HKrmZ
- Wall entry: /influencer/LHGCVS_CZpjf-As5HKrmZ
- Analysis ID: GzVv2KciFGilz4At1AjQF
- Source: https://www.redefiningwellnesscenter.com/
- Why this entry or scan should change
- Supporting links (one per line)
- Your business email (for verified disputes)
Verified challenges are posted publicly on the report. Public log, not legal arbitration.
Citations
Peer-reviewed and index sources cited in this report.
- [1] The Urgent Need to Advance Health Equity: Past and Present
- [2] Chiropractic treatment for gastrointestinal problems - PMC - NIH
- [3] What effect does chiropractic treatment have on gastrointestinal (GI ...
- [4] What effect does chiropractic treatment have on gastrointestinal (GI) disorders: a narrative review of the literature
- [5] Understanding Leaky Gut and how Chiropractic can help in ...
- [6] Objective Assessment of an Ionic Footbath (IonCleanse) - PMC
- [7] Objective Assessment of an Ionic Footbath (IonCleanse): Testing Its Ability to Remove Potentially Toxic Elements from the Body
- [8] Assessment of the Ability of Ionic Foot Bath (IonCleanse®) to ...
- [9] The dubious practice of detox
- [10] Ionic Foot Bath: Effect & Benefits on Your Overall Wellbeing
- [11] NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE ...
- [12] Myth or Reality—Transdermal Magnesium? - PMC - NIH
- [13] THE LYMPHATIC PARTICIPATION IN HUMAN CUTANEOUS PHENOMENA : A STUDY OF THE MINUTE LYMPHATICS OF THE LIVING SKIN - PubMed
- [14] Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Lymphedema and ...
- [15] Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation
- [16] 5.3. Evidence For Lower Cost
- [17] The effectiveness of integrative healthcare for chronic disease: A systematic review
- [18] East Meets West: A Whole-Person Approach in Integrated Care
- [19] The Effects of Integrative In-Patient Treatment on ...
- [20] Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
- [21] Adverse Events After Cervical Spinal Manipulation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
- [22] Nocturnal enuresis: treatment implications for the chiropractor.
- [23] Synovial plicae syndrome.
- [24] Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.
- [25] Factitious sneezing.
- [26] Chronic pelvic pain.
- [27] Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Lymphatic Procedures.
- [28] An Overview of the Identification and Management ...
- [29] A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation
- [30] Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Prevention of Metabolic ...
- [31] Influence of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Insulin Sensitivity in Chronic Pain Patients - PubMed
- [32] Take the lead.
- [33] Toxins, Toxicity, and Endotoxemia: A Historical and Clinical Perspective for Chiropractors.
- [34] Polymethoxylated N-Carboranyl Isoquinolinones: A New Scaffold for ABCG2 Inhibitors.
- [35] Oral herbal therapies for treating osteoarthritis
- [36] Toxins, Toxicity, and Endotoxemia: A Historical and Clinical Perspective for Chiropractors
- [37] Guidelines for poison control
- [38] Management of Poisonings and Intoxications - PMC
- [39] Antidotes for toxicological emergencies: A practical review
- [40] Self-reported nonmusculoskeletal responses to chiropractic intervention: a multination survey.
- [41] Chiropractic website claims related to non-musculoskeletal conditions: a cross-sectional study.
- [42] The treatment of neck and low back pain: who seeks care? who goes where?
- [43] The types and frequencies of improved nonmusculoskeletal symptoms reported after chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy.
- [44] Hypothesis: upregulation of a muscle-specific isoform of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) by spinal manipulation.
- [45] Chiropractic management of a patient with myasthenia gravis and vertebral subluxations.
- [46] [Retropharyngeal tendinitis after chiropractor therapy].
- [47] Interoception and emotion.
- [48] Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior.
- [49] Preschool emotional competence: pathway to social competence?
- [50] Stress reduction via neuro-emotional technique to achieve the ...
- [51] Brain functional connectivity changes on fMRI in patients with ...
- [52] Live versus self-paced delivery with 6-month follow-up
- [53] Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing for ...
- [54] A randomised controlled trial of the Neuro Emotional ... - PMC
- [55] Neuro Emotional Technique for the treatment of trigger point ...
- [56] Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke
- [57] Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
- [58] Acupuncture: Effectiveness and Safety | NCCIH
- [59] For More Information
- [60] Traditional Chinese Medicine: What You Need To Know
- [61] WHO benchmarks for the practice of acupuncture
- [62] Conservative therapy for plantar fasciitis: a narrative review of randomized controlled trials - PubMed
- [63] A randomized, controlled trial (with blind observer) of chiropractic manipulatioln and achilles stretching vs. orthotics for the treatment of plantar fasciitis
- [64] Orthotics Compared to Conventional Therapy and Other Non ... - PMC
- [65] Effect of Different Physiotherapeutic Interventions in Plantar ...
- [66] Scoliosis: biomechanics and rationale for manipulative treatment.
- [67] Hemidystrophic Thorax Mimicking Scoliosis.
- [68] Economic burden of nonoperative treatment of adult spinal deformity.
- [69] The association between individual radiographic findings and improvement after chiropractic spinal manipulation and home exercise among older adults with back-related disability: a secondary analysis.
- [70] Congenital Scoliosis.
- [71] Pediatric Orthopaedic Consults From Chiropractic Care.
- [72] Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review.
- [73] Combination Acupuncture and Cupping for Treating Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis.
- [74] Chiropractic treatment of scoliosis; a systematic review ... - PMC
- [75] Chiropractic Treatments for Idiopathic Scoliosis
- [76] Manual therapy as a conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review - PubMed
- [77] [PDF] Chiropractic Treatment of Scoliosis - Logan University
- [78] Essiac.
- [79] Integrative Medicine: Manual Therapy.
- [80] Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy versus physical therapist-led exercise and the risk of cauda equina syndrome in adults with lumbar disc herniation, stenosis, or radiculopathy.
- [81] Chiropractic diagnosis and treatment of closed head trauma.
- [82] Locked-In Syndrome Following Cervical Manipulation by a Chiropractor: A Case Report.
- [83] Exploring the use of manual therapy in the management of traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.
- [84] Acquired Horner's syndrome: clinical review.
- [85] Effectiveness of manual therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis
- [86] Comparative efficacy of conservative medical and chiropractic treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trail - PubMed
- [87] The effectiveness of manual therapy on pain, physical function, and nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- [88] Effectiveness of manual therapy to the Cervical Spine on ...